DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22269] - files pattern in

2005-11-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r331039 - in /ant/sandbox/antlibs/antunit/trunk/docs: antunit.html index.hmtl index.html

2005-11-05 Thread stevel
Author: stevel Date: Sat Nov 5 14:30:01 2005 New Revision: 331039 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=331039&view=rev Log: spelling correction, including that of index.html Added: ant/sandbox/antlibs/antunit/trunk/docs/index.html - copied, changed from r331036, ant/sandbox/antlibs/

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22269] - files pattern in

2005-11-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30886] - Enhance import task with filterset

2005-11-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: XmlProperty

2005-11-05 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Wed, 2 Nov 2005, Matt Benson >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > --- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> Hmm, I'd prefer (ab?)using PropertyHelpers for this instead of

Re: AntUnit

2005-11-05 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Simply make the presence of antunit a requirement just as we >> require junit today. > > So it could be fetched in some way similar to that > done by fetch.xml ... I was more thinking al

Re: AntUnit

2005-11-05 Thread Martijn Kruithof
Matt Benson wrote: --- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Does it need to? Ant doesn't know where to get junit either. Simply make the presence of antunit a requirement just as we require junit today. So it could be fetched in some way similar to that done by fetch.xml ...