[Patch] Property - remove deprecated code

- removed ProjectHelper.parsePropertyString - added PropertyHelper.parsePropertyString Kev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Patch] DependSet - remove unnecessary codw

- removed FileUtils Kev Index: D:/java_projects/ant-core-trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/DependSet.java === --- D:/java_projects/ant-core-trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/DependSet.java (revision 328

[Patch] Use file utils ina static manner where possible

Just a quickie on Concat Kev Index: D:/java_projects/ant-core-trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Concat.java === --- D:/java_projects/ant-core-trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Concat.java (revision 328575) +

Re: AntlibTest failing : Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project test-ant (in module ant) failed

On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > this is the output of AntlibTest in our gump runs. > I wonder whether anyone has an idea of what is going on there. > These tests pass for me on Win2K/cygwin/JDK 1.5. But fail if you fork them, correct? They don't

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37223] - dynamically extend ant's classpath, i.e. from inside of a running ant

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project test-ant-no-xerces (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project test-ant-no-xerces has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue a

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project test-ant (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project test-ant has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 1 p

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37223] - dynamically extend ant's classpath, i.e. from inside of a running ant

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

AntlibTest failing : Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project test-ant (in module ant) failed

Hello, this is the output of AntlibTest in our gump runs. I wonder whether anyone has an idea of what is going on there. These tests pass for me on Win2K/cygwin/JDK 1.5. Cheers, Antoine extract from : http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/ant/test-ant/gump_work/build_ant_test-ant.html [junit] T

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37241] - tasks that timeout do not perform tearDown if fork="true"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: fails if inner fileset directory does not exist.

Fair point though I would suggest a fileset that generates no matches (e.g. a typo in the includes or selector) might warrant this "error" behaviour to aid debugging in that case to be consistently "helpful". -Original Message- From: Alexey Solofnenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROT

Re: fails if inner fileset directory does not exist.

The current behaviour is useful, because it helps find build script problems easier. Otherwise a simple typo would be hidden and it will be a painful manual process to see why a build script does not do what it is supposed to do. - Alexey. On 10/25/05, Phil Weighill-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37241] - tasks that timeout do not perform tearDown if fork="true"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37241] - tasks that timeout do not perform tearDown if fork="true"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37241] - tasks that timeout do not perform tearDown if fork="true"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37241] New: - tasks that timeout do not perform tearDown if fork="true"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: fails if inner fileset directory does not exist.

I simply wonder if backwards compatibility is actually necessary here as a missing fileset base directory causes a build failure and I'd have thought that most builds would not depend on this sort of scenario. Clearly there could be some (IMHO) strange build scripts that do rely on this behaviou

New Ant PMC members

Hi all, The Ant PMC has voted to add Dominique Devienne and Martijn Kruithof to the PMC. Both have been long standing Ant committers and members of the Ant community. Congratulations to you both. Conor - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

AW: fails if inner fileset directory does not exist.

With the ability to configure that, we´d get a (default=true --> BWC) Users could override the default with . Jan >-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >Von: Phil Weighill-Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Oktober 2005 09:45 >An: Ant Developers List >Betreff: RE: fail

RE: fails if inner fileset directory does not exist.

My point is more about filesets in general rather than within delete specifically. I'd have thought that since old behaviour is unlikely to be relied on in build files (the implication is that something outside the build script *must* create certain directories otherwise the build fails) changin