[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project test-ant-no-xerces (in module ant) failed

2005-10-24 Thread Gump Integration Build
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project test-ant-no-xerces has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue a

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project test-ant (in module ant) failed

2005-10-24 Thread Gump Integration Build
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project test-ant has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 1 p

AW: fails if inner fileset directory does not exist.

2005-10-24 Thread Jan.Materne
Ok, I have done a little bit history: ${ant.version} on several Ant versions: [echo] Apache Ant version 1.7alpha compiled on June 15 2005 [delete] C:\TEMP\ant-test\aaa\bbb not found. BUILD SUCCESSFUL [echo] Apache Ant version 1.6.5 compiled on June 2 20

Re: fails if inner fileset directory does not exist.

2005-10-24 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 24 Oct 2005, Alexey Solofnenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am not sure if you agree with me that it is a problem on > not... The behaviour has changed. used to do nothing when > there was nothing to delete. I'm not sure whether this is true, but I think so. The same happens for copy

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37237] New: - JAR_MARKER added in 1.6.3 breaks indexjar element in jar task

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: fails if inner fileset directory does not exist.

2005-10-24 Thread Matt Benson
--- Martijn Kruithof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For the build file provided by alexey (with > failonerror="false") > > ant 1.6.2 gives : > Buildfile: test.xml > > all: >[delete] C:\java_stuff\aaa\bbb not found. > > BUILD SUCCESSFUL > Total time: 1 second > > Current 1.7 gives: > Buildf

svn commit: r328172 - in /ant/core/trunk/src: etc/testcases/taskdefs/delete.xml main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Delete.java testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/DeleteTest.java

2005-10-24 Thread mbenson
Author: mbenson Date: Mon Oct 24 15:30:21 2005 New Revision: 328172 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=328172&view=rev Log: was still failing. Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/delete.xml ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Delete.java ant/core

svn commit: r328166 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/Project.java

2005-10-24 Thread mbenson
Author: mbenson Date: Mon Oct 24 15:14:53 2005 New Revision: 328166 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=328166&view=rev Log: Revert previous change; apparently I am unhinged because I can't see how it's happening but I'm getting ConcurrentModificationExceptions willy-nilly. Modified: ant/c

Re: fails if inner fileset directory does not exist.

2005-10-24 Thread Alexey Solofnenko
I think it would be require something like the following: - flag in ; - lazy initialization, so can set this flag; - should always set this flag on all provided filesets. - Alexey. On 10/24/05, Phil Weighill-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Which has always given me grief. It has

RE: fails if inner fileset directory does not exist.

2005-10-24 Thread Phil Weighill-Smith
Which has always given me grief. It has always seemed sensible to me that a fileset would simply evaluate to no files if the base directory for the fileset doesn't exist (and perhaps generate a verbose log mentioning that fact) in the same way it does when the pattern(s) doesn't match anything.

Re: fails if inner fileset directory does not exist.

2005-10-24 Thread Martijn Kruithof
For the build file provided by alexey (with failonerror="false") ant 1.6.2 gives : Buildfile: test.xml all: [delete] C:\java_stuff\aaa\bbb not found. BUILD SUCCESSFUL Total time: 1 second Current 1.7 gives: Buildfile: test.xml all: BUILD FAILED C:\java_stuff\eclipse3.1\workspace\ant-trunk\

Re: fails if inner fileset directory does not exist.

2005-10-24 Thread Alexey Solofnenko
My mistake. It worked with failonerror="false". Now the flag does not [always] work. - Alexey. On 10/24/05, Alexey Solofnenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > With this build it worked: > > Apache Ant version 1.7alpha compiled on February 11 2005 > > - Alexey. > > On 10/24/05, Matt Benson <[EMAIL P

Re: fails if inner fileset directory does not exist.

2005-10-24 Thread Alexey Solofnenko
With this build it worked: Apache Ant version 1.7alpha compiled on February 11 2005 - Alexey. On 10/24/05, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That's my point. At what point in Ant's history would > the example work? > > -Matt > > --- Alexey Solofnenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > No,

Re: fails if inner fileset directory does not exist.

2005-10-24 Thread Matt Benson
That's my point. At what point in Ant's history would the example work? -Matt --- Alexey Solofnenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No, it does not. > > - Alexey. > > On 10/24/05, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > When did > > /> > > work? > > > > -Matt > > > > --- Alexey Solofne

Re: fails if inner fileset directory does not exist.

2005-10-24 Thread Alexey Solofnenko
No, it does not. - Alexey. On 10/24/05, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > When did > > work? > > -Matt > > --- Alexey Solofnenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I am not sure if you agree with me that it is a > > problem on not... The > > behaviour has changed. used to do nothing > >

Re: fails if inner fileset directory does not exist.

2005-10-24 Thread Matt Benson
When did work? -Matt --- Alexey Solofnenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am not sure if you agree with me that it is a > problem on not... The > behaviour has changed. used to do nothing > when there was nothing to > delete. > > - Alexey. > > On 10/24/05, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > w

Re: fails if inner fileset directory does not exist.

2005-10-24 Thread Alexey Solofnenko
I am not sure if you agree with me that it is a problem on not... The behaviour has changed. used to do nothing when there was nothing to delete. - Alexey. On 10/24/05, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Nothing ever works w/ filesets where the directory > does not exist... > > -Matt > >

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37225] - Ant "get" task doesn't handle correctly

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: fails if inner fileset directory does not exist.

2005-10-24 Thread Matt Benson
Nothing ever works w/ filesets where the directory does not exist... -Matt --- "Alexey N. Solofnenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This does not work: > > > > failonerror="false"> > > > > > > > - Alexey. > -- >

fails if inner fileset directory does not exist.

2005-10-24 Thread Alexey N. Solofnenko
This does not work: - Alexey. -- / Alexey N. Solofnenko home: http://trelony.cjb.net/ / - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] F

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37225] - Ant "get" task doesn't handle correctly

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31589] - Problems specific to OpenVMS

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31106] - VMS cannot handle long command strings, java, javac needs to use -v option..

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31106] - VMS cannot handle long command strings, java, javac needs to use -v option..

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: svn commit: r328083 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/Project.java

2005-10-24 Thread Matt Benson
ah, timing caused the conflict IMO... :) -Matt --- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > First time in months and I caused a conflct! > Peter > > On 10/24/05, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > ha, I wondered why I got weird conflicts. Thought > my > > eols got screwed up, did

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37184] - Repeated call of macro (defined by macrodef-task) causes slowing down of following processing

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37184] - Repeated call of macro (defined by macrodef-task) causes slowing down of following processing

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: svn commit: r328083 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/Project.java

2005-10-24 Thread Peter Reilly
First time in months and I caused a conflct! Peter On 10/24/05, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ha, I wondered why I got weird conflicts. Thought my > eols got screwed up, didn't know Peter was modifying > at the same time! :) > > -Matt > > --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Author: mbe

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37225] - Ant "get" task doesn't handle correctly

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: svn commit: r328083 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/Project.java

2005-10-24 Thread Matt Benson
ha, I wondered why I got weird conflicts. Thought my eols got screwed up, didn't know Peter was modifying at the same time! :) -Matt --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Author: mbenson > Date: Mon Oct 24 08:18:52 2005 > New Revision: 328083 > > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=328083&view=

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37225] New: - Ant "get" task doesn't handle correctly

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37223] - dynamically extend ant's classpath, i.e. from inside of a running ant

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37184] - Repeated call of macro (defined by macrodef-task) causes slowing down of following processing

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37184] - Repeated call of macro (defined by macrodef-task) causes slowing down of following processing

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37223] - dynamically extend ant's classpath, i.e. from inside of a running ant

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r328083 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/Project.java

2005-10-24 Thread mbenson
Author: mbenson Date: Mon Oct 24 08:18:52 2005 New Revision: 328083 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=328083&view=rev Log: Bugzilla 37184; submitted by Frank Harnack. Also replaced extra listener Vector instances by synchronization for ConcurrentModificationException guards. Modified:

Re: subversion commit

2005-10-24 Thread Peter Reilly
Thanks very much. That worked fine! Peter On 10/24/05, Stephane Bailliez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Peter Reilly wrote: > > >Hi, since we moved to subversion, I have been very inactive > >on the committing front. I tryed today to commit but could not. > > > > > >Is there some trick I need to

svn commit: r328081 - in /ant/core/trunk: CONTRIBUTORS WHATSNEW src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/Project.java

2005-10-24 Thread peterreilly
Author: peterreilly Date: Mon Oct 24 08:09:47 2005 New Revision: 328081 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=328081&view=rev Log: bugzilla 37184: multiple calls to addlistener for introspection helper objects reporter: Frank Harnack Modified: ant/core/trunk/CONTRIBUTORS ant/core/trunk/

Re: subversion commit

2005-10-24 Thread Stephane Bailliez
Peter Reilly wrote: Hi, since we moved to subversion, I have been very inactive on the committing front. I tryed today to commit but could not. Is there some trick I need to do?? You probably need to ssh to svn.apache.org and run svnpasswd See http://www.apache.org/dev/version-control.htm

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37223] New: - dynamically extend ant's classpath, i.e. from inside of a running ant

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

subversion commit

2005-10-24 Thread Peter Reilly
Hi, since we moved to subversion, I have been very inactive on the committing front. I tryed today to commit but could not. I have done a svn co --username peterreilly https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/core/trunk ant-core which worked fine. When I tryed to commit, the following came up [EMAIL

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project test-ant-no-xerces (in module ant) failed

2005-10-24 Thread Gump Integration Build
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project test-ant-no-xerces has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue a

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project test-ant (in module ant) failed

2005-10-24 Thread Gump Integration Build
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project test-ant has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 1 p

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37184] - Repeated call of macro (defined by macrodef-task) causes slowing down of following processing

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu