Re: my local version of supports filesystem resources now

On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like to revisit this after your changes are > committed. Sure. I've been in a train again yesterday and finished resource collection support for subant, apply, xslt and unzip/tar (untar should actually work for arbitrary resources

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36835] New: - The task "waitfor" does not check test conditions if the condition is "istrue"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: suggestion refactor SCM

Hi, The standard problem with any kind of refactoring is the backward compatibility requirement on source code level. There are a lot of constructs we'd like to remove, but upto now we have always weighted backward compatibility - even on source code level - over removing those. Martijn Kev

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34461] - problems with core task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: my local version of supports filesystem resources now

--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I was offline for a week but had time to do some > coding. I finished > resources support for and but > don't have the time > to commit it yet. This is just a heads up so that > Matt doesn't start > to work on it (hope I'm not too la

Re: suggestion refactor SCM

Hi, The standard problem with any kind of refactoring is the backward compatibility requirement on source code level. There are a lot of constructs we'd like to remove, but upto now we have always weighted backward compatibility - even on source code level - over removing those. Martijn Ke

Re: NoClassDefFoundError when loading class from -lib

Jon- Follow the log4j Install doc at http://www.ingrid.org/jajakarta/log4j/jakarta-log4j-1.1.3/INSTALL Marty- "Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans" - John Lennon - Original Message - From: "Jon McLennan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005

Re: suggestion refactor SCM

It certainly is an interesting idea. I think the main challenge in this endeavour is to figure out what is the common denominator between all the SCM systems and then assess if it is encompassing enough to warrant abstracting it out. I wish this effort will not be limited to tasks, but will al

Re: suggestion refactor SCM

Jose Alberto Fernandez a écrit : I think that it will be a very good idea, mostly as a stepping stone to higher level functionality. The main reason for not having such a thing is the fact that each project knows in advance what kind of repository is being in used. So why do we need something

RE: suggestion refactor SCM

I would suggest having a separate (external) "typedef" (or whatever the appropriate Ant concept would be): ... Referencing this value by ID would allow programmatic and build script level references to be made to such a repository without the need to know the exact de

RE: suggestion refactor SCM

I think that it will be a very good idea, mostly as a stepping stone to higher level functionality. The main reason for not having such a thing is the fact that each project knows in advance what kind of repository is being in used. So why do we need something abstract? On the other hand, once yo

NoClassDefFoundError when loading class from -lib

I posted this to the users list, but didn't get any response. Maybe someone on this list can help. I've taken the source for org.apache.tools.ant.Launcher and modified it to call my own version of Main.java. Essentially, the only change I made with that class is to allow the user to specify whi

Re: suggestion refactor SCM

Hi, it definitely is a good idea, and it's worth doing. SCM has become commonplace, just like databases. I think few people would object to lowering the barrier of moving to another SCM system and/or being more isolated from third-party SCM system changes. Jan Dvorak Kev Jackson wrote (sho

Re: suggestion refactor SCM

On 9/27/05, Kev Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > d - none of the above I know you are talking about an interface at the Ant task level, but I should also point out that this was one of the things I was referring to offering up Antlibs for if there was interest. http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.c