AW: Subversion migration?

2005-07-31 Thread Jan.Materne
Earlier [1] I said that we should develop 1.7 in CVS until release state, migrate to svn and build the release from svn. But now I think that we could migrate earlier - probably on a weekend. - cvs is down from 2006-01-01 - there is not so much development on HEAD at the moment - 1.7 needs a long

Bug report for Ant [2005/07/31]

2005-07-31 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Re: XJ - xml extension for Java

2005-07-31 Thread Igor Peshansky
Martin Gainty wrote on 07/31/2005 07:54:54 AM: > - Original Message - > From: "Igor Peshansky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, July 29, 2005 6:03 PM > Subject: Re: XJ - xml extension for Java > > > > Steve Loughran wrote on 07/04/2005

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30373] - Image Task flattens all directory structures.

2005-07-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: XJ - xml extension for Java

2005-07-31 Thread Martin Gainty
Castor will marshall to xml file or unmarshall from xml based on descriptor or reflection check out http://www.castor.org/xml-framework.html I knew of a guy named Igor Pechanski that worked on the Cygwin project that went to NYU any relation ??? Martin- - Original Message - From: "Igor

Re: XJ - xml extension for Java

2005-07-31 Thread Igor Peshansky
Jess Holle wrote on 07/10/2005 10:10:57 PM: > Kevin Jackson wrote: > [snip] > >I agree that pushing the correctness problem into the compilation, > >instead of the runtime phase is valuable in general. > > Exactly. > > Compile-time checking wherever it is net time savings to the developer > and

Re: XJ - xml extension for Java

2005-07-31 Thread Igor Peshansky
Alexey Solofnenko wrote on 07/04/2005 11:49:38 AM: > On JavaOne SUN presented something similar for Java 7. The syntax is not > finilized yet - there are problems - <> characters are used in Java > generics. They thinking about using # character, but it does not look good. > IBM's compiler do

Re: XJ - xml extension for Java

2005-07-31 Thread Igor Peshansky
Steve Loughran wrote on 07/04/2005 07:56:31 AM: > Kev Jackson wrote: > > Thought you may find this of interest. IBM have a new way of processing > > XML docs within Java. > > > > http://www.research.ibm.com/xj/samples/sample2.html > > > > Very cool page showing how this all works (cool in fir