AW: [patch] FTP.java - adding support for new features in com mons-net 1.4.0 and performance improvement

> Neeme Praks wrote: > > Ok, commons-net 1.4.0 has been released now. > > How can we proceed? > > > > Since there is apparently an Ant 1.6.4 version coming out on May 19th > and since Neeme Praks has already submitted a patch to accomodate it, > why not try to get this into that release? As th

AW: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Commons-Net 1.4.0 Released]

> I admit I know next to nothing about antlib, and in fact it > was nothing > until I googled it just now. If the code for such an task were > made to reside in such a structure (rather than in > commons-net itself) > there would be no circularity. > > However, unless there is a general mov

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34853] - [PATCH] FTP Task enhancement to a site command to be sent to FTP server after login

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34853] New: - [PATCH] FTP Task enhancement to a site command to be sent to FTP server after login

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [patch] FTP.java - adding support for new features in commons-net 1.4.0 and performance improvement

Neeme Praks wrote: Ok, commons-net 1.4.0 has been released now. How can we proceed? Meanwhile I also implemented the feature of retry-on-IOException, for FTP task. Stefan Bodewig wrote: The vote has passed and release is being prepared (see below). Hopefully it will be ready in a day or two. So

Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Commons-Net 1.4.0 Released]

Steve Loughran wrote: Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: From: Steve Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: Why not move the task or its new version into jakerta-commons and provide us with a ready to go feature full antlib. That would allow us to start decoupling things fro

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34845] - RFE: new task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32791] - xmlvalidate task fails with multiple files.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional SchemaValidateTest.java

stevel 2005/05/10 09:26:34 Modified:src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/optional schemavalidate.xml src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional XMLValidateTask.java src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34845] - RFE: new task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34845] New: - RFE: new task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Commons-Net 1.4.0 Released]

Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: From: Steve Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: Why not move the task or its new version into jakerta-commons and provide us with a ready to go feature full antlib. That would allow us to start decoupling things from the main ANT release

Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Commons-Net 1.4.0 Released]

On Tue, 10 May 2005, Jose Alberto Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We are all under Apache so borrowing from the current code should be > no issue (am I wrong?). Even if commons-net was not part of the ASF, it wouldn't be an issue. Stefan --

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.4 release

+1 - Alexey. On 5/9/05, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Do we want to release ant 1.6.4 on Thursday, May 19th > (this would at least suit Eclipse) > > [ ] Yes > [ ] No > > Cheers, > > Antoine > > - > To u

RE: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Commons-Net 1.4.0 Released]

> From: Steve Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: > > Why not move the task or its new version into jakerta-commons and > > provide us with a ready to go feature full antlib. That > would allow us > > to start decoupling > > things from the main ANT release. > > >

RE: Environment and PropertySet

--- Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: Matt Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > My reason for wanting to nest the propertyset into > a > > regular element is that these are passed by > > and to an Environment > > object. This means that if the code is added to > > En

cvs commit: ant/xdocs bindownload.xml srcdownload.xml

bodewig 2005/05/10 08:32:57 Modified:docs bindownload.html srcdownload.html xdocsbindownload.xml srcdownload.xml Log: Silly me, when Ajax picks up this change, the checksums will be there as well Revision ChangesPath 1.61 +3 -3 ant/docs/bi

cvs commit: ant/xdocs bindownload.xml srcdownload.xml

bodewig 2005/05/10 08:21:27 Modified:docs bindownload.html srcdownload.html xdocsbindownload.xml srcdownload.xml Log: Will provide SHA1 checksums soon Revision ChangesPath 1.60 +11 -7 ant/docs/bindownload.html Index: bindownload.html

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34839] - Task for finding files in a path

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Environment and PropertySet

> From: Matt Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > My reason for wanting to nest the propertyset into a > regular element is that these are passed by > and to an Environment > object. This means that if the code is added to > Environment, so that: > > > > refid="foo.properties" /> >

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32791] - xmlvalidate task fails with multiple files.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Company Disclaimer [WAS: RE: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.4 release]

Try GMail... it works pretty well and is a cool web-based e-mail system. Phil :n) On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 08:59 -0500, Dominique Devienne wrote: > And here comes the newly Company-wide instituted automatic > disclaimer inserted at the outbound email gateway... > > I'm really sorry about this. And

RE: Environment and PropertySet

--- Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Mon, 9 May 2005, Matt Benson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Variable can accept a nested PropertySet OR have > its > > > key & value attributes set as usual > > > > As far as names are c

RE: Environment and PropertySet

> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I knew there were a discussion about that ... > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-user&m=106278198725781&w=2 Eh, I even said the same thing back then! ;-) --DD -- This e-m

RE: Environment and PropertySet

> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Mon, 9 May 2005, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Variable can accept a nested PropertySet OR have its > > key & value attributes set as usual > > > > I wonder about the feeling of the dev community on such a > > change... ? > > Works

AW: Environment and PropertySet

I knew there were a discussion about that ... http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-user&m=106278198725781&w=2 Jan > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet am: Dienstag, 10. Mai 2005 16:36 > An: dev@ant.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Environment and

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34843] - doesnt work for filesets

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34843] - doesnt work for filesets

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Environment and PropertySet

On Mon, 9 May 2005, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Variable can accept a nested PropertySet OR have its > key & value attributes set as usual > > I wonder about the feeling of the dev community on such a > change... ? Works for me, although we better use a different name than propertyse

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34843] New: - doesnt work for filesets

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: RFC - rewrite of the delegating classloader FAQ

On Wed, 04 May 2005, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan Bodewig wrote: >>I also shortly thought about explaining the dangerous solutions >>(which probably work), but I'm not sure we want to talk about >> >> > I tried this, it does not work too good (well I could not get > it to

AW: cvs commit: ant build.xml

> The structure my patch creates is the structure the existing repo > expects. Oki-doki. Facts overtrump. Jan

Re: cvs commit: ant build.xml

On Tue, 10 May 2005, Jan Materne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wouldnt it be better to have the version in front of the name to get > all files together? > > ant-1.6.3.jar > ant-1.6.4.jar > ant-jsch-1.6.3.jar > ant-jsch-1.6.4.jar > ant-optional-1.6.3.jar > ant-optional-1.6.4.jar > > 1.6.3-ant.jar

AW: cvs commit: ant build.xml

> Betreff: cvs commit: ant build.xml > > bodewig 2005/05/10 06:57:48 > > Modified:.build.xml > Log: > Add SHA1 checksums, prepare stuff for > http://www.apache.org/dist/java-repository/ > > + > + > + > + > + > + Wouldnt it

Re: proposed build.xml changes to speed up releases

On Wed, 4 May 2005, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have one or two other ideas to make the release faster : I've added a bit to the main_distribution target that you may want to take into account when you make your modifications. (1) add SHA1 checksums in addition to the MD5

Re: cvs commit: ant WHATSNEW

woohoo! I didn't do it! (I was scared :) -Matt --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > bodewig 2005/05/10 00:37:03 > > Modified:.WHATSNEW > Log: > fix NPE reported by Curt Arnold > > Revision ChangesPath > 1.818 +3 -0 ant/WHATSNEW > > Index: WHATSNEW >

Company Disclaimer [WAS: RE: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.4 release]

And here comes the newly Company-wide instituted automatic disclaimer inserted at the outbound email gateway... I'm really sorry about this. And there's nothing I can do, I think, except maybe try to post from a different account, using a different mail client, which would be a bit of a PITA. Any

cvs commit: ant build.xml

bodewig 2005/05/10 06:58:53 Modified:.Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH build.xml Log: merge Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.392.2.42 +32 -0 ant/build.xml Index: build.xml =

cvs commit: ant build.xml

bodewig 2005/05/10 06:57:48 Modified:.build.xml Log: Add SHA1 checksums, prepare stuff for http://www.apache.org/dist/java-repository/ Revision ChangesPath 1.467 +32 -0 ant/build.xml Index: build.xml

RE: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.4 release

> From: Antoine Levy-Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Do we want to release ant 1.6.4 on Thursday, May 19th > (this would at least suit Eclipse) > > [+1] Yes > [ ] No --DD -- This e-mail, including any attached files, may c

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34841] New: - CVS Task don't work on Windows based CVS

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34839] - Task for finding files in a path

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34839] New: - Task for finding files in a path

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Commons-Net 1.4.0 Released]

On Tue, 10 May 2005, Steve Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is decoupling now a strategic priority for Ant? No, I wouldn't put it that strong. > Can you please provide me with more details, examples? We haven't moved any existing Ant task out of Ant yet, but with the Antlibs subproject and SV

Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Commons-Net 1.4.0 Released]

Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: Why not move the task or its new version into jakerta-commons and provide us with a ready to go feature full antlib. That would allow us to start decoupling things from the main ANT release. Jose Alberto I have not been as active in Ant circles as in the past. Is dec

Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Commons-Net 1.4.0 Released]

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Tue, 10 May 2005, Steve Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In the next few weeks (months) I am intending to rework the task to take advantage of these new capabilities. Maybe Neeme Praks' patch[1] would provide a nice starting point? Stefan Footnotes: [1] http://marc.the

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.4 release

On Tue, 10 May 2005, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Do we want to release ant 1.6.4 on Thursday, May 19th +1 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Commons-Net 1.4.0 Released]

On Tue, 10 May 2005, Steve Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In the next few weeks (months) I am intending to rework the > task to take advantage of these new capabilities. Maybe Neeme Praks' patch[1] would provide a nice starting point? Stefan Footnotes: [1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.4 release

On May 10, 2005, at 2:48 AM, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Do we want to release ant 1.6.4 on Thursday, May 19th (this would at least suit Eclipse) [X] Yes [ ] No +1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional command

RE: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Commons-Net 1.4.0 Released]

Why not move the task or its new version into jakerta-commons and provide us with a ready to go feature full antlib. That would allow us to start decoupling things from the main ANT release. Jose Alberto > -Original Message- > From: Steve Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 10 May 20

[Fwd: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Commons-Net 1.4.0 Released]

The new release of jakarta-commons-1.4.0 contains some features that were specifically designed with Ant in mind. In particular the FTPClientConfig class was designed with the thought of enabling the enhancement of the ant task to 1. handle ftp servers with file listing formats that format da

RE: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.4 release

+1 Jose > -Original Message- > From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 10 May 2005 10:42 > To: Ant Developers List > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.4 release > > > Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > > Do we want to release ant 1.6.4 on Thursday, May 19th > > (this would at least

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.4 release

Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Do we want to release ant 1.6.4 on Thursday, May 19th (this would at least suit Eclipse) [+1 ] Yes [ ] No steve - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.4 release

Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Do we want to release ant 1.6.4 on Thursday, May 19th (this would at least suit Eclipse) [ +1] Yes [ ] No steve - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.4 release

Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Do we want to release ant 1.6.4 on Thursday, May 19th (this would at least suit Eclipse) [ ] Yes [ ] No Cheers, Antoine Yes, Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-m

Fwd: [PGP] New Sandbox component

If you want to join the fun, please come over to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cheers Stefan > To: commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org > Subject: [PGP] New Sandbox component > From: Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 10:34:59 +0200 > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Hi, > >

Re: [patch] FTP.java - adding support for new features in commons-net 1.4.0 and performance improvement

Ok, commons-net 1.4.0 has been released now. How can we proceed? Meanwhile I also implemented the feature of retry-on-IOException, for FTP task. Stefan Bodewig wrote: The vote has passed and release is being prepared (see below). Hopefully it will be ready in a day or two. Sounds good.

cvs commit: ant/xdocs faq.xml

bodewig 2005/05/10 00:39:37 Modified:docs Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH faq.html xdocsTag: ANT_16_BRANCH faq.xml Log: Merge FAQ changes from HEAD Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.77.2.24 +128 -33 ant/docs

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant DirectoryScanner.java

bodewig 2005/05/10 00:37:29 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH DirectoryScanner.java Log: merge Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.64.2.12 +1 -1 ant/src/main/org/apache

cvs commit: ant WHATSNEW

bodewig 2005/05/10 00:37:29 Modified:.Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH WHATSNEW Log: merge Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.503.2.224 +3 -0 ant/WHATSNEW Index: WHATSNEW ===

Re: ant 1.6.3 breakage of cpptasks

On Tue, 10 May 2005, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 9 May 2005, Curt Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I have had two reports in log4cxx of compile failures that seem to >> be caused by changes in Ant 1.6.3, >> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=log4cxx-user&m=11152259730666

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant DirectoryScanner.java

bodewig 2005/05/10 00:37:04 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant DirectoryScanner.java Log: fix NPE reported by Curt Arnold Revision ChangesPath 1.100 +1 -1 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/DirectoryScanner.java Index: DirectoryScanner.java

cvs commit: ant WHATSNEW

bodewig 2005/05/10 00:37:03 Modified:.WHATSNEW Log: fix NPE reported by Curt Arnold Revision ChangesPath 1.818 +3 -0 ant/WHATSNEW Index: WHATSNEW === RCS file: /home/cvs/ant/WHATSNEW

Re: ant 1.6.3 breakage of cpptasks

On Mon, 9 May 2005, Curt Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have had two reports in log4cxx of compile failures that seem to > be caused by changes in Ant 1.6.3, > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=log4cxx-user&m=111522597306665&w=2 Bug in DirectoryScanner that I'll look into. > and > http://ma

cvs commit: ant/xdocs/stylesheets templates.vm

bodewig 2005/05/10 00:03:33 Modified:docs antnews.html bindownload.html bylaws.html contributors.html cvs.html external.html faq.html index.html legal.html license.html mail.html mission.html problems.html projec