Re: ResourceCollections

--- Martijn Kruithof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'll use your example below to ask what will be > (im)possible > > The question is not whether the resourcecollection > themselve need a > namespace, but if it would be allowed to address > elements from the same > namespace, so that the default

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34461] - problems with core task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: ResourceCollections

Matt Benson wrote: --- Martijn Kruithof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [SNIP] Apart from the variands A and B further below, would the following also work? or would this mean that the resoursecollection must be part of set itself? As I understand it, yes, because the x