DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29978] - No way to run Apt processor for JDK 1.5

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29978] - No way to run Apt processor for JDK 1.5

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29978] - No way to run Apt processor for JDK 1.5

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: References

Ha, I think we've been stonewalled. What we're talking about is great for add* methods, but I think we're out of luck for create* methods. Although I never use these anymore either. Seems kind of bad to say "refid works on all datatypes automatically, unless you use createXXX methods"... :( I m

Re: Suggested change to Move.java to check failonerror flag when unable to delete source file as part of move

Move is a subclass of Copy. Move has no execute method of its own; it inherits that of Copy. Copy checks failonerror within its execute method, so Move treats failonerror exactly as does Copy. -Matt --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Matt > > Thanks for your reply. > > I am not sure I agree t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29978] - No way to run Apt processor for JDK 1.5

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Suggested change to Move.java to check failonerror flag when unable to delete source file as part of move

Matt Thanks for your reply. I am not sure I agree that failonerror is being honored by the Move task in the same fashion that it is by the Copy task. If you take a look at Copy - it checks failonerror when it encounters an error, where Move does not check this flag at all. The doc also indicat

RE: References

> From: Matt Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hmm, from all your comments it seems you have pointed > out that the best solution would be for types to have > no knowledge whatsoever of refids. True. > Of course this is > not possible under the gaze of the BC monster. We > could always star

Re: Suggested change to Move.java to check failonerror flag when unable to delete source file as part of move

--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [SNIP] > I have some ant scripts that manage archiving files > between NT servers in > our production environment. A while back the move > task began failing with > an error related to deleting the source file (see > below) > > [move] Warning: Unable to delete fi

RE: References

Hmm, from all your comments it seems you have pointed out that the best solution would be for types to have no knowledge whatsoever of refids. Of course this is not possible under the gaze of the BC monster. We could always start the mythological Ant 2 after 1.7 to apply the learning of the past

Suggested change to Move.java to check failonerror flag when unable to delete source file as part of move

A couple of weeks back I sent the following to the ant user list without any response. I am thinking that the dev list would have been a better place for this request. Can someone here give this a read and let me know if this change can be accepted back into the ant source. Thanks, Gary Bartlet

RE: References

> From: Matt Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Ever noticed that every Ant type that supports the > id/refid pattern must include a load of custom code? > Why? Wouldn't it be possible in UE to check all > DataType subclass elements for refid, validate no > other attributes/elements/nested text

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34403] New: - zipgroupfileset should support a nested pattern specification

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

References

Ever noticed that every Ant type that supports the id/refid pattern must include a load of custom code? Why? Wouldn't it be possible in UE to check all DataType subclass elements for refid, validate no other attributes/elements/nested text, and substitute the actual object? It doesn't appear tha

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34398] - alternate task syntax

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34231] - options in compilerarg silently overridden by defaults or ignored.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34398] - alternate task syntax

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34398] - alternate task syntax

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34398] - alternate task syntax

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: ResourceCollections

--- Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [SNIP] > Don't worry, I'll stop rambling on this topic ;-) > --DD > Please don't. If I'm going to dump this ResourceCollection stuff into HEAD I'd rather have this resolved first, and right now only five committers have shown any interest in this

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34398] - alternate task syntax

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Little bit of repository surgery

--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Steve Loughran > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Here is what I'm thinking, > > Pretty much what I'd suggest as well (what, not how > you plan to do). > Also make maven2 the default. > > > thoughts that may break anyone that h

RE: ResourceCollections

> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Thu, 07 Apr 2005, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We should be able to make all the current conditions, selectors and > > filters be typedefs. > > +1 As I wrote on the same thread, I'm starting to think that adding roles* as typede

RE: [Ant Wiki] Update of "AntNewbies" by SteveLoughran

> + And the element "a" -be it task, datatype, whatever, does not support > nested elements of type "b". It is a parse time error, done when mapping > XML nodes to the implementation classes. It used to be a parse time error Steve. Now that everything's a UE however, you'll only discover the 'syn

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34398] - alternate task syntax

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Little bit of repository surgery

Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Steve Loughran wrote: ... What do people think about my plan? Any possibility of not duplicating code between Maven/MavenWagon and Ant? Been discussed. I think I may use wagon in the smartfrog impl, but not the ant one. (a) all the fetching is in tasks.Get already (b) h

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34398] - alternate task syntax

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34398] - alternate task syntax

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34398] - alternate task syntax

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Little bit of repository surgery

Steve Loughran wrote: ... What do people think about my plan? Any possibility of not duplicating code between Maven/MavenWagon and Ant? -- Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] - verba volant, scripta manent - (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) --

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34398] New: - alternate task syntax

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Little bit of repository surgery

On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here is what I'm thinking, Pretty much what I'd suggest as well (what, not how you plan to do). Also make maven2 the default. > thoughts that may break anyone that has been using the task to > date. (which may be only me) It proba

Little bit of repository surgery

Maven2 is out, with a new layout policy * new remote: http://ibiblio.org/maven2 * local store ~/.m2/repository * layout algorithm both local and remote: * project/version/artifact-version[-classifier][.extension] * every artifact has a .pom where -project gets mapped from dotted to / : org.apache.

1.6 branch changes

Hi, I've ported the fixes for bugs 30798 and 27162/29954 from HEAD to the 1.6 branch. Both have been confirmed by users of the nightly builds and both are pretty small (once you factor out the whitespace changes in the JUnit case). If anybody wants me to pull them out again, I'll do so. Cheers

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30798] - JUnit showoutput implementation grabs System.out and System.err later than it should

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit JUnitTestRunner.java

bodewig 2005/04/11 03:36:53 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH JUnitTestRunner.java Log: Merge fix for 30798 Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.42.2.

[Ant Wiki] Update of "AntNewbies" by SteveLoughran

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Ant Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by SteveLoughran: http://wiki.apache.org/ant/AntNewbies The comment on the change is: explain error message more clearly. -

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34119] - [chmod] Warning: UNIXProcess.forkAndExec native error: The parameter or environment lists are too long.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34119] - [chmod] Warning: UNIXProcess.forkAndExec native error: The parameter or environment lists are too long.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: ResourceCollections

On Thu, 07 Apr 2005, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We should be able to make all the current conditions, selectors and > filters be typedefs. +1 > There are only a few name over-laps: >and, or, not (selectors and conditions) and we need to solve them - there will be more to com

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29954] - Ant attempts to process result sets for SQL statements that do not return result sets, generating CLI0125E function sequence error in DB2

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34119] - [chmod] Warning: UNIXProcess.forkAndExec native error: The parameter or environment lists are too long.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29954] - Ant attempts to process result sets for SQL statements that do not return result sets, generating CLI0125E function sequence error in DB2

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs SQLExec.java

bodewig 2005/04/11 02:31:16 Modified:.Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH WHATSNEW src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH SQLExec.java Log: merge fix for 27162 Revision ChangesPath No revision No

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs SQLExec.java

bodewig 2005/04/11 02:31:01 Modified:.WHATSNEW src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs SQLExec.java Log: merge fix for 27162 Revision ChangesPath 1.803 +4 -2 ant/WHATSNEW Index: WHATSNEW ===

BCEL change (was Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project dist-ant (in module ant) failed)

>[javac] Compiling 57 source files to > /home/gump/workspaces2/public/workspace/ant/build/classes >[javac] > /home/gump/workspaces2/public/workspace/ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util/depend/bcel/AncestorAnalyzer.java:44: > exception java.io.IOException is never thrown in body of cor

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project dist-ant (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project dist-ant has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 5 p

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/dotnet DotnetCompile.java

bodewig 2005/04/11 01:41:27 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/dotnet DotnetCompile.java Log: Oops, forgot /reference: Revision ChangesPath 1.29 +1 -1 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/dotnet/Dotne

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/dotnet CSharp.java DotnetBaseMatchingTask.java DotnetCompile.java

bodewig 2005/04/11 01:39:41 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/dotnet CSharp.java DotnetBaseMatchingTask.java DotnetCompile.java Log: mcs on Linux doesn't like quotes in /references. I guess it is a platform-d

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32948] - javac task passes -source option to javac 1.2/1.1 which does not support -source option

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32948] - javac task passes -source option to javac 1.2/1.1 which does not support -source option

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project dist-ant (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project dist-ant has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 5 p

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28882] - Add if and unless attributes to ProjectComponent.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu