DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24798] - BZip2: faster, less memory

2005-03-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24798] - BZip2: faster, less memory

2005-03-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18732] - expand properties during -propertyfile processing

2005-03-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34144] - properties are not expanded when using -propertyfile

2005-03-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Prototype work on XML+XSL based Ant doc

2005-03-25 Thread James Fuller
Dominique Devienne wrote: >>From: James Fuller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>a few ruminations; >> >>- replace with or , easier on the >> >> >eye > >Sounds good. I also thought of for definition. Even shorter > > have used and >>- description / section text should be free to use >> >

Re: Prototype work on XML+XSL based Ant doc

2005-03-25 Thread James Fuller
>probably due to my ignorance of more advanced XML technologies. I think >your proposals would be a lot easier to understand if you actually took >ant.xml and modified it to show what you mean. Inside XHTML, Docbook, >Dublin Core, etc... markup in there, change the structure as you propose >in a c

RE: Prototype work on XML+XSL based Ant doc

2005-03-25 Thread Dominique Devienne
> From: James Fuller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > a few ruminations; > > - replace with or , easier on the eye Sounds good. I also thought of for definition. Even shorter while still explicit enough (?). And after Peter's comments on verbosity, I've also thought of skipping altogether, but

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util GlobPatternMapper.java RegexpPatternMapper.java

2005-03-25 Thread peterreilly
peterreilly2005/03/25 04:29:22 Modified:.Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH WHATSNEW docs/manual/CoreTypes Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH mapper.html src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH GlobPatternMapper.java RegexpPatternMapper.java

cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/types/mappers GlobMapperTest.java RegexpPatternMapperTest.java

2005-03-25 Thread peterreilly
peterreilly2005/03/25 04:28:59 Modified:.WHATSNEW docs/manual/CoreTypes mapper.html src/etc/testcases/types/mappers globmapper.xml regexpmapper.xml src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util GlobPatternMapper.java

Re: Prototype work on XML+XSL based Ant doc

2005-03-25 Thread James Fuller
a few ruminations; - replace with or , easier on the eye - description / section text should be free to use XHTML: xmlns:x="" Docbook: xmlns:db="" Dublin Core xmlns:dc="" Current namespace elements should mimic docbook simple subset of elements, for future integration/mapping. - I would sug

Validation of instance variables

2005-03-25 Thread Kev Jackson
We usually have to check to ensure that various values aren't null before calling execute() in the tasks. I've been thinking about this, and it seems that at the moment every task handles it differently. Some check the values as part of theexecute method, some have a seperate private method th

[patch] oata.taskdefs.email

2005-03-25 Thread Kev Jackson
- namehiding - removed extra whitespace[shrug] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[patch] Stylebook task javadoc

2005-03-25 Thread Kev Jackson
noticed Stylebook was missing @param, renamed m_foo -> foo Kev Index: StyleBook.java === RCS file: /home/cvspublic/ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/StyleBook.java,v retrieving revision 1.16 diff -u -r1.16 StyleBook.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34144] New: - properties are not expanded when using -propertyfile

2005-03-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs SignJarTest.java

2005-03-25 Thread Kev Jackson
Well, a bit of hackery and you can verify that JAR is signed. But there is *nothing* to verify that the signature itself is trusted. Essentially "jarsigner -verify" is a worthless piece of junk from the security perspective. Who'd have thought that a commit message would have me ROFL! "Worthl

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34138] - Ant should use other compilers when Sun's Javac can not be found

2005-03-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29097] - should be inside task in order for dependency checking to work.

2005-03-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34151] New: - need to propagage proxy information to

2005-03-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32973] - batchtest does not work well with custom formatter

2005-03-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu