DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33626] - Uptodate condition is not workinge

2005-02-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33622] - Compiler dies with [javac] javac: invalid flag: -source 1.4

2005-02-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33626] - Uptodate condition is not workinge

2005-02-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33626] - Uptodate condition is not workinge

2005-02-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33626] New: - Uptodate condition is not workinge

2005-02-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [GUMP@brutus]: Project test-ant (in module ant) failed

2005-02-17 Thread Matt Benson
--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > CloneTest fails on my Linux machine outside of Gump > as well. What kind of setups are people able to make this fail on? I have gotten access to a Linux box but the tests pass for me. :( -Matt > > Cheers > > Stefan > > ---

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33622] - Compiler dies with [javac] javac: invalid flag: -source 1.4

2005-02-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33622] - Compiler dies with [javac] javac: invalid flag: -source 1.4

2005-02-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33622] - Compiler dies with [javac] javac: invalid flag: -source 1.4

2005-02-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33622] New: - Compiler dies with [javac] javac: invalid flag: -source 1.4

2005-02-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/proposal/sandbox/svn README

2005-02-17 Thread bodewig
bodewig 2005/02/17 07:07:20 Modified:proposal/sandbox/svn README Log: I never claimed I could spell - thanks Martin Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +1 -1 ant/proposal/sandbox/svn/README Index: README =

Re: that svn task

2005-02-17 Thread Martin van den Bemt
There is a small typo : vor instead of for :) Mvgr, Martin Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, Rob Oxspring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I haven't used it yet but have you seen: http://subclipse.tigris.org/svnant.html It might be an easier route to svn support! Sorry if that pours water on yo

Re: cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks checksum.html

2005-02-17 Thread Thomas Schapitz
Kev Jackson schrieb: I don't think that this is the major problem. It's very very very unlikely that anyone would want to tamper with Ant (why bother, a user can always get teh source and build themselves?). The problem is that when using Ant to build new code (and to generate a checksum for t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33618] New: - telnet fails with java.lang.NullPointerException

2005-02-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [GUMP@brutus]: Project test-ant (in module ant) failed

2005-02-17 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> CloneTest fails on my Linux machine outside of Gump >> as well. > > Hmm, can one or more of you Linux guys run this > snippet for me? I do my Unix testing on Solaris and > don't have

Re: cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks checksum.html

2005-02-17 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But can the forged file with identical MD5 masquerade as the > original file, i.e. still be a Zip file, or tar'd gzipped or bzipped > file? Yes. At least for ZIP it would be easy. Just add data as much as you need to external

Re: cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks checksum.html

2005-02-17 Thread Kev Jackson
But can the forged file with identical MD5 masquerade as the original file, i.e. still be a Zip file, or tar'd gzipped or bzipped file? Sure, what you describe sounds bad, but I'm trying to figure out (without too much research of my own ;-) if it's a real problem in practice. --DD In practice the