DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26108] - delete task fails for jar file in CWD on WNT

2004-09-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: ANT Taks: CheckTokens

2004-09-16 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004, Holger Krauth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (that I didnt find answered neither in FAQ nor in "Contributing") It's not really properly documented. The process goes along the lines of "try to get the attention of a committer by either posting to the dev list or Bugzilla (or bo

Re: AW: AW: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant PropertyHel per . java

2004-09-16 Thread Peter Reilly
Steve Loughran wrote: Peter Reilly wrote: No, I am saiding that I see the same behaviour on all the jdks I tested with (1.2, 1.4 and 1.5). dos/unix file conversion? I do not think so. I am using linux. The change that caused the issue was an new line being added to the file being tested, so on do

Re: AW: AW: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant PropertyHel per . java

2004-09-16 Thread Steve Loughran
Peter Reilly wrote: No, I am saiding that I see the same behaviour on all the jdks I tested with (1.2, 1.4 and 1.5). dos/unix file conversion? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO

Re: AW: AW: AW: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant Propert yHel per . java

2004-09-16 Thread Peter Reilly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: everywhere failing? Or passing? passing with current cvs head. (I.E. the test in question has an "F", all the jdks report a size of 33 for the file) Peter Jan -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet am: Donnerstag, 16.

AW: AW: AW: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant Propert yHel per . java

2004-09-16 Thread Jan . Materne
everywhere failing? Or passing? Jan > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet am: Donnerstag, 16. September 2004 12:15 > An: Ant Developers List > Betreff: Re: AW: AW: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant > PropertyHel per . java > > No

Re: AW: AW: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant PropertyHel per . java

2004-09-16 Thread Peter Reilly
No, I am saiding that I see the same behaviour on all the jdks I tested with (1.2, 1.4 and 1.5). Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe the implementation of java.io.File.length() has changed? I do not think so. I tested with jdk1.4.2 and jdk1.5.0 on linux Neither do I, but that would exp

AW: AW: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant PropertyHel per . java

2004-09-16 Thread Jan . Materne
> >Maybe the implementation of java.io.File.length() has changed? > > > I do not think so. > > I tested with jdk1.4.2 and jdk1.5.0 on linux Neither do I, but that would explain that :) Ok, how to deal with that? a) pass different sizes from the buildfile to the testcase depending on JDK version

Re: AW: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant PropertyHel per . java

2004-09-16 Thread Peter Reilly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe the implementation of java.io.File.length() has changed? I do not think so. I tested with jdk1.4.2 and jdk1.5.0 on linux Peter Jan -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet am: Donnerstag, 16. September 2004 11:02 A

AW: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant PropertyHel per . java

2004-09-16 Thread Jan . Materne
Maybe the implementation of java.io.File.length() has changed? Jan > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet am: Donnerstag, 16. September 2004 11:02 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant PropertyH

Re: Error on Contributors Tech Guide HTML page

2004-09-16 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, Jan Materne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Who can maintain that [1] page? Any ASF member, at least in theory. Fixed. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAI

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant PropertyHel per . java

2004-09-16 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>Why doesn't the test fail for me? And why doesn't it fail in Gump? >> > It did fail for you with jdk1.2!. True, I forgot that. Why doesn't it fail on any other JDK, the file size should be the same. Stefan

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31254] - Error on Contributors Tech Guide HTML page

2004-09-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant PropertyHel per . java

2004-09-16 Thread Peter Reilly
Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The only difference between them is that version 1.2 has a new line character at the end of the line and version 1.1 does not have the new line character. Mea culpa. The change has been necessary and I shoul

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant PropertyHel per . java

2004-09-16 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The only difference between them is that version 1.2 has a new line > character at the end of the line and version 1.1 does not have the > new line character. Mea culpa. The change has been necessary and I should have documented it.

Error on Contributors Tech Guide HTML page

2004-09-16 Thread Jan . Materne
Who can maintain that [1] page? Jan [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/contributors.html#cvsbasics > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet am: Donnerstag, 16. September 2004 09:00 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31254] -

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31254] - Error on Contributors Tech Guide HTML page

2004-09-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31258] New: - add build.compiler.executable default property

2004-09-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31251] - manifest task improperly truncates long lines for classpath attribute.

2004-09-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31251] - manifest task improperly truncates long lines for classpath attribute.

2004-09-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu