clonevm on

2004-08-25 Thread Dave Brondsema
The new clonevm attribute on the task looked like exactly what I needed, but it seems to only clone the built in system properties and not ones specified one the commandline (e.g. ant -Dmyapp.foo=bar). I tried changing BuiltinPropertySetName to "all" didn't work. How can this be done? Thanks,

Re: clonevm on

2004-08-25 Thread Dave Brondsema
Dominique Devienne wrote: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The new clonevm attribute on the task looked like exactly what I needed, but it seems to only clone the built in system properties and not ones specified one the commandline (e.g. ant -Dmyapp.foo=bar). I tried changing Bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30601] - Error in jar task

2004-08-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30601] - Error in jar task

2004-08-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: clonevm on

2004-08-25 Thread Dominique Devienne
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > The new clonevm attribute on the task looked like exactly what I > needed, but it seems to only clone the built in system properties and not > ones specified one the commandline (e.g. ant -Dmyapp.foo=bar). I tried > changing BuiltinProperty

clonevm on

2004-08-25 Thread brondsem
The new clonevm attribute on the task looked like exactly what I needed, but it seems to only clone the built in system properties and not ones specified one the commandline (e.g. ant -Dmyapp.foo=bar). I tried changing BuiltinPropertySetName to "all" didn't work. How can this be done? Thanks,

[GUMP@brutus]: ant/ant-embed-optional success

2004-08-25 Thread Gump Integration Build
To whom it may satisfy... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project ant-embed-optional *no longer* has an issue. Project State : 'Success', Reason '' F

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30601] - Error in jar task

2004-08-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30601] - Error in jar task

2004-08-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30365] - zip-task doesn't zip the empty directories

2004-08-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[GUMP@brutus]: ant/ant-embed-optional success

2004-08-25 Thread Gump Integration Build
To whom it may satisfy... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project ant-embed-optional *no longer* has an issue. Project State : 'Success', Reason '' F

RE: Ant 1.6.3 [was status report on the PMC list]

2004-08-25 Thread Dominique Devienne
> From: Jose Alberto Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > No, I was talking about our processes in my regular work. Ah, but we're not asking you to switch to SVN ;-) Seriously, the merge burden needs to be addressed, and I really believe SVN is a possible solution (not the solution). --DD -

RE: Ant 1.6.3 [was status report on the PMC list]

2004-08-25 Thread Jose Alberto Fernandez
> From: Dominique Devienne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > From: Jose Alberto Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > From: Dominique Devienne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Another more controversial alternative would be to use a CM tool > > > with better merging abilities, and Subversion co

[Fwd: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30365] - zip-task doesn't zip the empty directories]

2004-08-25 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
Hey Matt, This was a quick one. You had done the work. Cheers, Antoine Original Message Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30365] - zip-task doesn't zip the empty directories Date: 25 Aug 2004 15:02:12 - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Ant Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30365] - zip-task doesn't zip the empty directories

2004-08-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Zip.java

2004-08-25 Thread antoine
antoine 2004/08/25 07:58:10 Modified:.Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH WHATSNEW src/etc/testcases/taskdefs Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH zip.xml src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH ZipTest.java src/main/org/ap

cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs ZipTest.java

2004-08-25 Thread antoine
antoine 2004/08/25 07:56:41 Modified:.WHATSNEW src/etc/testcases/taskdefs zip.xml src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs ZipTest.java Log: Zip task did not create tasks when there are only empty directories in the selection I have simply

RE: Ant 1.6.3 [was status report on the PMC list]

2004-08-25 Thread Dominique Devienne
> From: Jose Alberto Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > From: Dominique Devienne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Another more controversial alternative would be to use a CM > > tool with better merging abilities, and Subversion comes to > > mind of course. From the little I've read, it seems tha

SMB task

2004-08-25 Thread Marcel Stör
Hi, As I couldn't find an SMB task (copy to remote Windows/Samba server plus authentication) for Ant, I'm thinkin' about implementing my own. Apart from the SMB stuff, all I had to do is to extend from Copy and to override doFileOperations()!? I would also have to replace FileUtils.copyFile() with

AW: Ant 1.6.3 [was status report on the PMC list]

2004-08-25 Thread Jan . Materne
No, there is no buildin support. All you can do is to use , of course. Then better using the <*def>s to hide the Something like But there will be SVN-support in the future ... but future is long :-) Jan > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Jose Alberto Fernandez [mailto:[EMA

RE: Ant 1.6.3 [was status report on the PMC list]

2004-08-25 Thread Jose Alberto Fernandez
> From: Dominique Devienne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Another more controversial alternative would be to use a CM > tool with better merging abilities, and Subversion comes to > mind of course. From the little I've read, it seems that SVN > does merges better, without the need for tags,

AW: Ant 1.6.3 [was status report on the PMC list]

2004-08-25 Thread Jan . Materne
Forrest switched to SVN, for example. Jan > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Dominique Devienne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet am: Mittwoch, 25. August 2004 15:46 > An: Ant Developers List > Betreff: RE: Ant 1.6.3 [was status report on the PMC list] > > > From: Conor MacNeill [mail

RE: Ant 1.6.3 [was status report on the PMC list]

2004-08-25 Thread Dominique Devienne
> From: Conor MacNeill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > The choices I see for branch management are: > > 1. Keep going the way we are now - i.e. applying changes to both HEAD > and the active branch. > > 2. Keep going as we do now but make sure branches are shorter lived. The >impact of this would

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30365] - zip-task doesn't zip the empty directories

2004-08-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[GUMP@brutus]: ant/ant-embed-optional success

2004-08-25 Thread Gump Integration Build
To whom it may satisfy... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project ant-embed-optional *no longer* has an issue. Project State : 'Success', Reason '' F

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30760] - sql task handle pl/sql with ';' in pl/sql code. (patch)

2004-08-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Ant 1.6.3 [was status report on the PMC list]

2004-08-25 Thread Conor MacNeill
Stephen McConnell wrote: What is the criteria that is use by the Ant project for a major, minor, and micro version bump? Stephen. This is my opinion. A major version number increment represents a change in internal architecture. At such a transition some level of backwards compatibility breakage

[GUMP@brutus]: ant/ant-embed-optional success

2004-08-25 Thread Gump Integration Build
To whom it may satisfy... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project ant-embed-optional *no longer* has an issue. Project State : 'Success', Reason '' F