cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Exit.java

2004-04-29 Thread mbenson
mbenson 2004/04/29 15:10:56 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Exit.java Log: Remove unused import. Revision ChangesPath 1.32 +0 -1 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Exit.java Index: Exit.java

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs fail.xml

2004-04-29 Thread Matt Benson
The way Peter originally suggested to fix this was the simplest. I originally coded up that change in December or January, I think... it didn't strike me as a BC issue because I didn't think about the possibility that someone would want to extend Exit/... oh, well... -Matt --- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

cvs commit: ant/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs fail.xml

2004-04-29 Thread mbenson
mbenson 2004/04/29 14:25:40 Modified:src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs FailTest.java docs/manual/CoreTasks fail.html src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Exit.java src/etc/testcases/taskdefs fail.xml Log: Restore Task inheritan

RE: cvs commit: ant/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs fail.xml

2004-04-29 Thread Jose Alberto Fernandez
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Jose Alberto Fernandez > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Why aren't all the conditions being types? > > Because the answer "Why aren't all the selectors being > types?" is equally valid. Which one gets typedefed as "a

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28517] - SCP task fails when invoked multiple times.

2004-04-29 Thread Nick Chalko
True, I only posted the last call. The SCP is is in the target called by I will run it again and find out what invocation # fails. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs fail.xml

2004-04-29 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Jose Alberto Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why aren't all the conditions being types? Because the answer "Why aren't all the selectors being types?" is equally valid. Which one gets typedefed as "and"? Stefan ---

RE: cvs commit: ant/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs fail.xml

2004-04-29 Thread Jose Alberto Fernandez
> From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: > > >You could also have an add(Condition) method and > >that would allow your "no nesting required" notation without > having to > >extend ConditionBase. > > > > > > > This depends on getting the built-in condi

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs fail.xml

2004-04-29 Thread Peter Reilly
Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: You could also have an add(Condition) method and that would allow your "no nesting required" notation without having to extend ConditionBase. This depends on getting the built-in conditions implemented as types, which in turn depends on getting the "role" code in to

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs fail.xml

2004-04-29 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Jose Alberto Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You could also have an add(Condition) method and > that would allow your "no nesting required" notation without > having to extend ConditionBase. If all conditions inside Ant were known types, that is. AFAIK they are not an

RE: cvs commit: ant/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs fail.xml

2004-04-29 Thread Jose Alberto Fernandez
You could also have an add(Condition) method and that would allow your "no nesting required" notation without having to extend ConditionBase. As a matter of fact, now that the introspector is able to deal with "add" methods. Shouldn't we deprecate ConditionBase and discourage people from using inh

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28505] - [PATCH] File paths to imported build files should not be canonicalized

2004-04-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs fail.xml

2004-04-29 Thread Peter Reilly
I see a small problem here. Exit was extending Task, and now is extending ConditionBase. ConditionBase does not extend Task so this breaks backward compatiblity. It may be better to do this: rather that: (Dispite the fact that I normally argue against extra nesting). Peter [EMAIL

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26849] - [PATCH] Pathconvert output in xml format and write to file

2004-04-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28681] - [PATCH] Xml output for the SQL task

2004-04-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28681] New: - [PATCH] Xml output for the SQL task

2004-04-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Possible Enhancements to datatype

2004-04-29 Thread Jose Alberto Fernandez
I think we are streaching the meaning of way beyond what is what defined for. is used by -projecthelp to generate online help on a terminal console. It was not conceived as a javados style facility. If we want to provide something like or to ducument ANT buildfiles, Then I think we should go

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22269] - files pattern in

2004-04-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks import.html

2004-04-29 Thread peterreilly
peterreilly2004/04/29 03:14:17 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH import.html Log: sync Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.6.2.8 +4 -8 ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/import.html Index: import.html

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks import.html

2004-04-29 Thread peterreilly
peterreilly2004/04/29 03:13:18 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks import.html Log: Describe relative file behaviour in task. Revision ChangesPath 1.13 +4 -8 ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/import.html Index: import.html

Re: Error reporting pb with

2004-04-29 Thread Peter Reilly
I have not been able to duplicate this with ant head of ant 1.6.1. I tried the following: And tried to get the javac to fail by changing the permission of the classes directory, and also by moving the javac program. In both cases the stacktrace was available wi

Possible Enhancements to datatype

2004-04-29 Thread Claas Thiele
Short: a) description element should allow every attribute and every markup inside. b) description element should be usable inside macrodef, presetdef and any container task like sequential. a) und b) will not be processed by ant (simply ignored). text nodes will be processed only. What can be

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28403] - Floating attribute for import task

2004-04-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14255] - Jar task does not generate INDEX.LST considering entries in MANIFEST's classpath

2004-04-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28669] - Can't generate JAR index correctly

2004-04-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu