DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28642] New: - Problems running task javac with Ant1.6.1 and Jdk 1.4.2_04

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[Ant Wiki] Updated: AntTasks

Date: 2004-04-27T12:42:19 Editor: 208.254.132.131 <> Wiki: Ant Wiki Page: AntTasks URL: http://wiki.apache.org/ant/AntTasks no comment Change Log: -- @@ -3,3 +3,5 @@ There is a great deal of "folklore"

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28565] - org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Execute

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Execute.java

mbenson 2004/04/27 11:14:54 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Execute.java Log: Move Process stream closure into a new public static method, closeStreams(Process). PR: 28565 Revision ChangesPath 1.81 +21 -8 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/task

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Execute.java

--- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan Bodewig wrote: > >Is it save to call getXYZStream on a Process > instance after it has > >terminated or even been destroyed? I've never > tried it and the > >Javadocs don't say anything. > > Stefan: The test cases all pass. I imagine this is

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28565] - org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Execute

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Execute.java

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 27 Apr 2004, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: } catch (InterruptedException e) { process.destroy(); +} finally { +try { +process.getInputStream().close(); +process.getOutputStream().close(); +

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Execute.java

On 27 Apr 2004, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >} catch (InterruptedException e) { >process.destroy(); > +} finally { > +try { > +process.getInputStream().close(); > +process.getOutputStream().close(); > +

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Execute.java

mbenson 2004/04/27 08:30:56 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Execute.java Log: More typo corrections (not mine). Revision ChangesPath 1.80 +3 -3 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Execute.java Index: Execute.java ===

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28565] - org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Execute

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Execute.java

mbenson 2004/04/27 08:24:46 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Execute.java Log: Fix typo. Revision ChangesPath 1.79 +2 -2 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Execute.java Index: Execute.java ===

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Execute.java

mbenson 2004/04/27 08:23:25 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Execute.java Log: Close process streams in waitFor(Process). PR: 28565 Revision ChangesPath 1.78 +8 -1 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Execute.java Index: Execute.java

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28565] - org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Execute

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: [Container|Composite]Mapper

> I still don't remember doing that, but it's in the > log... oh well! So much done? :-) Most important is THAT it´s there. Minor important is WHO has done it. Jan

RE: [Container|Composite]Mapper

--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Sorry, it wasn´t me :-) > As the changelog [1] shows I added only the last > example (use of @attributes > inside > (1.14). The comes from Matt > (1.16). I still don't remember doing that, but it's in the log... oh well! -Matt _

RE: use of canonical in

+1 from me too. > -Original Message- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 27 April 2004 13:33 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: use of canonical in > > > On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Basicly the issue is whether to canonic

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28565] - org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Execute

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28624] - about using ant.bat in

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28624] New: - about using ant.bat in

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28565] - org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Execute

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28565] - org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Execute

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: use of canonical in

On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Basicly the issue is whether to canonicalize the imported file name > or to use the absolute path. > > Jesse makes a good point for using the absolute path. The problem > is that this is a incompatible change. Yep, he found similar pr

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17973] - A target just like a target

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28620] - Allow a "final" task to be performed

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28621] New: - Enhancement of InputRequest class

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

use of canonical in

Jesse has found a problem with the use of in a modular build system - in netbeans. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28505 Basicly the issue is whether to canonicalize the imported file name or to use the absolute path. Jesse makes a good point for using the absolute path. The prob

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28620] New: - Allow a "final" task to be performed

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28614] - backslash is removed from filter token value

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[Ant Wiki] Updated: Proposals

Date: 2004-04-27T02:34:53 Editor: 194.213.87.193 <> Wiki: Ant Wiki Page: Proposals URL: http://wiki.apache.org/ant/Proposals no comment Change Log: -- @@ -4,3 +4,4 @@ * Being able to view the manual

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28614] New: - backslash is removed from filter token value

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit JUnitTask.java

bodewig 2004/04/27 00:45:48 Modified:.Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH WHATSNEW build.xml docs/manual/OptionalTasks Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH junit.html src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH JUnitTask.java Log:

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/OptionalTasks junit.html

bodewig 2004/04/27 00:45:34 Modified:docs/manual/OptionalTasks junit.html Log: @since Revision ChangesPath 1.36 +1 -1 ant/docs/manual/OptionalTasks/junit.html Index: junit.html === RCS file

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24697] - The JUnit plugin forks once for each test suite

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit JUnitTask.java

bodewig 2004/04/27 00:44:48 Modified:.WHATSNEW build.xml docs/manual/OptionalTasks junit.html src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit JUnitTask.java Log: forkstyle -> forkmode Revision ChangesPath

RE: [Container|Composite]Mapper

> >>Ps. > >>Thanks for updating the doc for macrodef, esp the > >>text element!. > >> > >> > > > >Actually, that was all Jan's work. I just noticed a > >missing "e" on the word "attribut" and thought I'd fix > >it... > > > > > > > Ok, > Then thanks Jan! > > Peter Sorry, it wasn´t me :-) As

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks macrodef.html

jhm 2004/04/26 22:16:51 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH macrodef.html Log: Merge: Missing '<' in @text-example. Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.2.2.17 +2 -2 ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/macrod

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks macrodef.html

jhm 2004/04/26 22:14:40 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks macrodef.html Log: Missing '<' in @text-example. Revision ChangesPath 1.18 +2 -2 ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/macrodef.html Index: macrodef.html ==