DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28547] New: - Java task writes extra blank line after process output, without leading [java] tag

2004-04-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant WHATSNEW

2004-04-22 Thread mbenson
mbenson 2004/04/22 14:36:35 Modified:.WHATSNEW Log: Merge Redirector bugfix to 1.6 branch. Revision ChangesPath 1.594 +5 -5 ant/WHATSNEW Index: WHATSNEW === RCS file: /home/cvs/ant/W

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util LazyFileOutputStream.java

2004-04-22 Thread mbenson
mbenson 2004/04/22 14:33:06 Modified:.Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH WHATSNEW src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH Redirector.java src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH LazyFile

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28546] New: - Ant should offer hierarchical resource containment

2004-04-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/types MapperTest.java

2004-04-22 Thread Matt Benson
Most notably, had to changed to not automatically reject nested elements when other attributes (other than refid) are set. The use-case for this is: However unlikely, it can be done, and is supported with the current code, which is an interesting hybrid of mine and Peter's patches.

cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/types MapperTest.java

2004-04-22 Thread mbenson
mbenson 2004/04/22 13:27:21 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util ContainerMapper.java docs/manual/CoreTypes mapper.html src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types Mapper.java defaults.properties src/testcases/org/apache

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26310] - Ant 1.6 and XDoclet 1.2 "destDir attribute must be present." error

2004-04-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs java.xml

2004-04-22 Thread mbenson
mbenson 2004/04/22 13:18:35 Modified:src/etc/testcases/taskdefs java.xml Log: Incorporate to improve the chances of a pass on Windows. :( Also make the failures more instructive for redirect* testcases. Revision ChangesPath 1.14 +128 -56 ant/src/etc/testcases/t

nested condition in

2004-04-22 Thread Matt Benson
Can anyone give a good reason not to allow this, other than "you can get along without it?" If not, I am going to commit this to HEAD soon... -Matt __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Photos: High-quality 4x6 digital prints for 25¢ http://photos.ya

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant Project.java

2004-04-22 Thread stevel
stevel 2004/04/22 07:48:31 Modified:src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant DirectoryScannerTest.java src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util WeakishReference.java src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/rmic DefaultRmicAdapter.java

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant Project.java

2004-04-22 Thread stevel
stevel 2004/04/22 07:03:47 Modified:src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/util FileUtilsTest.java src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util FileUtils.java src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs SignJar.java src/main/org/apache/tools/ant Project.java

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28513] - Ant executes targets that are dependencies of other targets which are not selected because of an "if" attribute.

2004-04-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util/regexp RegexpUtil.java

2004-04-22 Thread stevel
stevel 2004/04/22 05:41:10 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util/regexp RegexpUtil.java Log: One less complaint from jikes about code style. Revision ChangesPath 1.11 +3 -0 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util/regexp/RegexpUtil.java Index: RegexpU

RE: cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTypes filterchain.html

2004-04-22 Thread Jan . Materne
Ok, the changes [1] are not in 1.6 codebase. Is there a way to "undo" the commit? Or should the 15390 be applied to 1.6 as well? Jan [1] http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/Re gularExpression.java?r1=1.15&r2=1.16&diff_format=h > -Original Message-

RE: cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTypes filterchain.html

2004-04-22 Thread Jan . Materne
Ok, the only (bigger by size) modification is that the changes from 1.14->1.15 [1,2] is not in Ant 1.6-manual. "Make the choice of regular expression implementation possible with ant.regexp.regexpimpl as a normal project property. PR: 15390" (antoine). I´ll take a look into the sources of 1.6 ...

RE: cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTypes filterchain.html

2004-04-22 Thread Jan . Materne
ups, more than I´d modified. Have to have a look at that... Jan > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 12:02 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTypes filterchain.html > > > jhm

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTypes filterchain.html

2004-04-22 Thread jhm
jhm 2004/04/22 03:02:09 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTypes Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH filterchain.html Log: merge Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.13.2.6 +18 -28ant/docs/manual/CoreTypes/filterchain.html Index: filte

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTypes filterchain.html

2004-04-22 Thread jhm
jhm 2004/04/22 02:57:44 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTypes filterchain.html Log: Fix syntax errors in examples. Revision ChangesPath 1.19 +4 -4 ant/docs/manual/CoreTypes/filterchain.html Index: filterchain.html

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28426] - DynamicConfiguratorNS

2004-04-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28426] - DynamicConfiguratorNS

2004-04-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28426] - DynamicConfiguratorNS

2004-04-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: timestamp checking

2004-04-22 Thread Steve Loughran
Matt Benson wrote: --- Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am thinking we can and should factor out all timestamp checking into one place, like FileUtils and FileSet. +1 Incidentally, on that granularity discussion yesterday. There is a platform independent way to determine this: experi