DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28480] - [PATCH] Assorted small docs corrections

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28480] New: - [PATCH] Assorted small docs corrections

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28479] - [PATCH] Minor correction to xdocs/external.xml

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28479] New: - [PATCH] Minor correction to xdocs/external.xml

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Ant 1.6.2 ?

Ant 1.6.1 was released on February 12, 2004 Are there plans to release Ant 1.6.2 soon? My company is sticking with Ant 1.5.4 until Ant 1.6.2 becomes available. Ant 1.6.1 is not usable for us due to bug # 27057 http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27057 Also... Ant 1.6.1 is emb

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28320] - copy task preserving permissions

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28474] New: - JUnitResultFormatter throws BuildException due to classloading issues

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: AntCall manual typo?

Stefan Bodewig wrote: > like Ant creates a complete new independent project > instance. If we'd use "target" here, people would think we are > operating in the same context as the calling project Ah, of course. Thank you, Peter and Stefan. -- Jack J. Woehr# "[F]ar in the empty sky

Re: Junit assertions

OK, I see the problem: In CommandlineJava#addCommandsToList(ListIterator) we have //now any assertions are added if (getAssertions() != null) { getAssertions().applyAssertions(this); } this adds VmArgs to the CommandlineJava instance for the configured asserti

Re: Junit assertions

On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So CommandLineJava#getCommandline() produces a result without the > -ea switch on the first invocation and one with the argument on the > second. Actually it adds -ea:AssertionTest on each invocation. If you use multiple log statem

Re: Junit assertions

If you move the log statement in front of setCommandLine as in log(cmd.describeCommand(), Project.MSG_VERBOSE); execute.setCommandline(cmd.getCommandline()); the tests will pass but -ea: will not be part of the verbose output. So CommandLineJava#getCommandline() produces a result

Re: Junit assertions

Run it with -debug instead of -verbose ... Execute:Java13CommandLauncher: Executing '/usr/local/java/j2sdk1.4.2_04/jre/bin/java' with arguments: '-ea:AssertionTest' '-classpath' '/home/bodewig/ASF/jakarta/jakarta-ant/src/etc/testcases/types/assertions/build:/home/bodewig/junit/junit3.8.1/junit.ja

Re: Junit assertions

On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am very confused. So am I on first glance. If it helps a little, the problem is a cross-platform one. Happens on my Linux box running Sun's 1.4.2_04 as well. Stefan -

Junit assertions

Run test-junit in the assertions.xml test file on java1.4 :- test-junit: [junit] Implicitly adding C:\Java\Apache\ant\lib\junit.jar;C:\Java\Apache\ant\lib\ant-launcher.jar;C:\Java\Apache\ant\lib\ant.jar;C:\Java\Apache\ant\lib\ant-junit.jar to CLASSPATH [junit] Executing 'C:\Java\JDK\jre\

cvs commit: ant/src/etc/testcases/types assertions.xml

stevel 2004/04/19 08:40:04 Modified:src/etc/testcases/types assertions.xml Log: removing one line Revision ChangesPath 1.4 +1 -1 ant/src/etc/testcases/types/assertions.xml Index: assertions.xml ===

Re: AntCall manual typo?

On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Jack Woehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think "target" is meant here, not "project" in both these > sentences. No, project is correct. like Ant creates a complete new independent project instance. If we'd use "target" here, people would think we are operating in the same

Re: AntCall manual typo?

The manual is correct, if a bit hard to follow. Using antcall, or ant, or subant, creates a new project. One can control the properties and references that this new project has by using the attributes and elements of antcall etal. Peter Jack Woehr wrote: In the manual pages for AntCall, text says:

AntCall manual typo?

In the manual pages for AntCall, text says: Used to choose references that shall be copied into the new project, optionally changing their id. and You can specify a set of properties to be copied into the new project with propertysets. I think "target" is meant here, not "project" i

cvs commit: ant/src/etc/testcases/types assertions.xml

stevel 2004/04/19 08:10:04 Modified:src/etc/testcases/types assertions.xml Log: show the alternate invocation mechanism does work. hmm. Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +16 -1 ant/src/etc/testcases/types/assertions.xml Index: assertions.xml =

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27218] - arent cloneable

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28444] - Import: Target Handling Bug

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28445] - add description attribute to project and macrodefs

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28444] - Import: Target Handling Bug

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28444] - Import: Target Handling Bug

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit JUnitTask.java

stevel 2004/04/19 07:25:43 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit JUnitTask.java Log: Javadocs and some refactoring. tmpDir is now validated and used consistently where properties files are created. Revision ChangesPath 1.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28445] - add description attribute to project and macrodefs

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28444] - Import: Target Handling Bug

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/types AssertionsTest.java

stevel 2004/04/19 06:42:57 Modified:src/etc/testcases/types/assertions AssertionTest.java src/etc/testcases/types assertions.xml src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/types AssertionsTest.java Added: src/etc/testcases/types/assertions AssertionMain.jav

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types Commandline.java

stevel 2004/04/19 06:41:46 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types Commandline.java Log: accessor to arguments Revision ChangesPath 1.38 +10 -0 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/Commandline.java Index: Commandline.java =

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28445] - add description attribute to project and macrodefs

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28445] - add description attribute to project and macrodefs

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

How read a property of another xml file

Hi all, we use Ant to implement a test tool of our application. A log parser is execute in each target to establish the application functional results. Our test tool is essentially composed by two different Ant projects, A.xml and B.xml for example. . In each A.xml target we implement one comm

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27549] - [PATCH] ZipOutputStream -- intresting flush code

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28456] - NullpointerException on flush()

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Your bill

Your document is attached. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]