DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28300] New: - tools.jar not found

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28299] - Please add inside

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28299] - Please add inside

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28299] - Please add inside

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28299] - Please add inside

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28299] - Please add inside

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28299] - Please add inside

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28299] New: - Please add inside

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/OptionalTasks chgrp.html

mbenson 2004/04/08 10:19:40 Modified:docs/manual/OptionalTasks chgrp.html Log: Spelling corrections and minor wording change. Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +4 -3 ant/docs/manual/OptionalTasks/chgrp.html Index: chgrp.html ==

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28283] - OutOfMemory error

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28283] - OutOfMemory error

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Ant.java

bodewig 2004/04/08 07:59:52 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH Ant.java Log: merge Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.92.2.7 +4 -2 ant/src/main/org/apache/too

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Ant.java

bodewig 2004/04/08 07:58:19 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Ant.java Log: Don't die if the ant.file property hasn't been set. Jelly's Ant tag library currently doesn't set this property and each task used in Jelly will result in an NPE otherwise. Revision

Re: Ant 1.6 and Jelly/Maven

On Thu, 08 Apr 2004, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmm, Jelly uses Grant as well, so maybe this is a first trace for > the problem we see. Completely wrong. I think I've found it and next night's Gump run will show. Jelly doesn't set the ant.file property on project instances it c

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28283] - OutOfMemory error

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28283] New: - OutOfMemory error

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: submitting a patch

I certainly don't want to break any conventions by trying to introduce a task that doesn't work on all of the target JDK versions. If there is a way to do that, I'm open to whatever you guys suggest. For now, I have built from CVS HEAD and also created a separate jar that contains my task. I have a

RE: antlib and classloaders

> From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: > > > > >As the URI protocol "antlib:" provides a shortcut for the > >above, I am just thinking on providing something similar for the > >classpath declaration when needed. > > > >. > > > > > > > I have bee

SSH documenting

> A patch that describes the verbose attribute to > docs/manual/OptionalTasks/scp.html would be a good start ;-) See below. Also I expanded the range of tested versions up to 0.1.14 because that is the version I have used. However I have not done any exhaustive testing so you might want to remove

Re: SSH tracking - Take 4

On Wed, 7 Apr 2004, Rami Ojares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> What we need now, are docs. > > Yep, I think also Jsch would need some docs and an API that does not > need one to write bytes by hand but that is another story. True. > I can help of course with the docs (but slowly :) A patch that

Re: SSH RemoteUri bug

On Thu, 8 Apr 2004, Rami Ojares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > isRemoteUri() method in Scp.java is seriously flawed. true. > Therefore I propose that for Scp there should be for example > remoteFile and localFile attributes instead of file. We can only do that in addition to the existing file att

SSH RemoteUri bug

Hi, isRemoteUri() method in Scp.java is seriously flawed. private boolean isRemoteUri(String uri) { boolean isRemote = true; int indexOfAt = uri.indexOf('@'); if (indexOfAt < 0) { isRemote = false; } return isRemote; } A local file path can very well on windows and un

Re: antlib and classloaders

Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: As the URI protocol "antlib:" provides a shortcut for the above, I am just thinking on providing something similar for the classpath declaration when needed. . I have been doing a little thinking about this. What about a task to specify the classpath to use if

Re: submitting a patch

On Wed, 7 Apr 2004, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since the Hotswap task won't work unless the JDk is 1.4 or greater > (because of the JPDA), can it really be considered for inclusion > into ant proper? I don't have any opinion on the task itself (yet) so I'll only comment on the JDK 1.4 question.

Re: java1.5 features of interest

On Wed, 07 Apr 2004, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1. a new ProcessBuilder : > http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/jcp/beta1/apidiffs/java/lang/ProcessBuilder.html > > Either this eliminates all the platform specific grunge, or it adds > new complexity We could use it as yet another lau

Re: Ant 1.6 and Jelly/Maven

On Thu, 8 Apr 2004, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, I've gotten myself on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cool. > because I'm interested in that anyway, so I won't cross-post to gump > again :) OK, last cross-post so that people interested in that issue know to join [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> I didn

RE: Ant 1.6 and Jelly/Maven (was Re: [GUMP@lsd]: ant-1.5/ant-1.5 failed)

Ok, I've gotten myself on [EMAIL PROTECTED] because I'm interested in that anyway, so I won't cross-post to gump again :) > > This would be contributing to Maven's failure with Ant 1.6 > then, too. > > Quite possible. > > I didn't know that Maven had a problem with Ant 1.6, even > though I am

Ant 1.6 and Jelly/Maven (was Re: [GUMP@lsd]: ant-1.5/ant-1.5 failed)

[I keep [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the loop even though it probably isn't really that interesting for Gump. But Brett isn't subscribed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I don't want to cross-post this to four lists.] On Thu, 8 Apr 2004, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EM

Re: [GUMP@lsd]: ant-1.5/ant-1.5 failed

The build fails because Gumpy passes quite a few command line arguments to bootstrap.sh that are not expected. In particular the -Xbootclasspath option kills Ant. System properties as well as the -verbose switch shouldn't apply to

Re: [GUMP@lsd]: ant-1.5/ant-1.5 failed

The build fails because Gumpy passes quite a few command line arguments to bootstrap.sh that are not expected. In particular the -Xbootclasspath option kills Ant. System properties as well as the -verbose switch shouldn't apply to

RE: [GUMP@lsd]: ant-1.5/ant-1.5 failed

Hi Stefan, This would be contributing to Maven's failure with Ant 1.6 then, too. We had to roll that back. Additionally, the classloader changes caused a few problems. I'd be interested to hear what you find out regarding 1.6 and Jelly. Cheers, Brett > -Original Message- > From: Stefan

Re: [GUMP@lsd]: ant-1.5/ant-1.5 failed

The build fails because Gumpy passes quite a few command line arguments to bootstrap.sh that are not expected. In particular the -Xbootclasspath option kills Ant. System properties as well as the -verbose switch shouldn't apply to

[GUMP@lsd]: ant-1.5/ant-1.5 failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For help understanding the request please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project ant-1.5 has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects