DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27116] - Imported target depends not preserved when overridden

2004-03-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27116] - Imported target depends not preserved when overridden

2004-03-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27722] - Project description contains target description

2004-03-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27722] - Project description contains target description

2004-03-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27722] - Project description contains target description

2004-03-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27722] - Project description contains target description

2004-03-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27722] New: - Project description contains target description

2004-03-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25345] - jspc tag broken with new version of jasper

2004-03-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27441] - JspC optional task and tomcat 5.x

2004-03-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27057] - tagdiff.xsl missing param elements

2004-03-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27718] - CvsTagDiff fails, "Could not find variable with the name of title"

2004-03-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Pb with ++

2004-03-16 Thread Matt Benson
Good point. I will personally keep this in mind as I work in Ant and be on the lookout for any such situations (reference to an OutputStream or Writer nulled w/o being closed?). Maybe we can periodically test removing the gc call, especially if a committer thinks he has fixed a missing close() is

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27718] New: - CvsTagDiff fails, "Could not find variable with the name of title"

2004-03-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Pb with ++

2004-03-16 Thread Alexey N. Solofnenko
I have had such problems with still open files and every time I thought it was a JDK bug, but later by adding try/finally with close() I fixed it. gc() is usually needed when somebody forgets to close a stream (and there was just such bug in ANT about not closing a stream and I think it was in

RE: Pb with ++

2004-03-16 Thread Matt Benson
--- Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Don't get me wrong Matt, no question what you're > doing is > the right thing, since it fixes real problems. But I > always > hate it when we litter our code with turn arounds > for bugs. > > No other solution here, but I wish SUN would fix > the

RE: Pb with ++

2004-03-16 Thread Dominique Devienne
> From: Matt Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Nope, I'm running 1.6.0. But it's always scary to me > > when one needs > > System.gc() in ones code... As we all know, this > > Dominique: please believe that I hated to add this to > the code. Unfortunately, IT WORKS. If you search the > lists

RE: Pb with ++

2004-03-16 Thread Matt Benson
--- Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: Peter Reilly > > Have you tried the lastest cvs version of the > delete task, Matt has > > added a System.gc to the Delete#delete method > which solves a lot of > > timing issues with windows. > > Nope, I'm running 1.6.0. But it's always

RE: Pb with ++

2004-03-16 Thread Dominique Devienne
> From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Possible, but unlikely here I think. I'm afraid it's a timing issue. > >Now is it a problem with NTFS or with what the JVM does, I don't know! > > > Have you tried the lastest cvs version of the delete task, Matt has > added a System.gc to the Delet

Re: Pb with ++

2004-03-16 Thread Peter Reilly
Dominique Devienne wrote: From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ZipFile is supposed to do that, but apparently it doesn't work. not having windows, i cannot test this. It may also be that another process has it's grubby hands on the zip file. Possible, but unlikely here I th

RE: Pb with ++

2004-03-16 Thread Dominique Devienne
> From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >ZipFile is supposed to do that, but apparently it doesn't work. > not having windows, i cannot test this. It may also be that another > process has it's grubby hands on the zip file. Possible, but unlikely here I think. I'm afraid it's a timing iss

Re: Pb with ++

2004-03-16 Thread Peter Reilly
Dominique Devienne wrote: I have 2 independent CruiseControl builds: one write help zip files to a server somewhere, while the other reads them when it detects changes when it wakes up. There a inherent concurrency issue / race condition in this scenario, which I try to address with the Ant code be

Pb with ++

2004-03-16 Thread Dominique Devienne
I have 2 independent CruiseControl builds: one write help zip files to a server somewhere, while the other reads them when it detects changes when it wakes up. There a inherent concurrency issue / race condition in this scenario, which I try to address with the Ant code below.

[Ant Wiki] Updated: AntTutorialWritingTasks

2004-03-16 Thread ant-cvs
Date: 2004-03-16T07:54:42 Editor: 193.109.238.66 <> Wiki: Ant Wiki Page: AntTutorialWritingTasks URL: http://wiki.apache.org/ant/AntTutorialWritingTasks hint to manual; remove my name; format codings Change Log: --

Problems with using setproxie

2004-03-16 Thread Edson Alves Pereira
Hello folks, I trying to use to edit some file in my build process, but even thought with setproxie properly setted xerces cannot create a HTTP connection, could someone give me some tips? Here is the exception: [xmltask] Dummy pre-1.5 xml catalog [xmltask] java.net.ConnectException:

Re: Suggested using.html diff

2004-03-16 Thread Peter Reilly
Committed, thanks. Peter Jack Woehr wrote: I think this is more accurate in detail than what stands now. -- Jack J. Woehr# "[F]ar in the empty sky a solitary esophagus slept http://www.well.com/~jax # upon motionless wing; everywhere brooded stillness, http://www.softwoehr.com # seren

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual using.html

2004-03-16 Thread peterreilly
peterreilly2004/03/16 02:02:34 Modified:docs/manual Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH using.html Log: sync with HEAD Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.31.2.4 +10 -2 ant/docs/manual/using.html Index: using.html

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual using.html

2004-03-16 Thread peterreilly
peterreilly2004/03/16 02:01:58 Modified:docs/manual using.html Log: doc: clarification of targets in using.html Obtained from: Jack J. Woehr Revision ChangesPath 1.34 +10 -2 ant/docs/manual/using.html Index: using.html ===

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27641] - Ordering of targets affects processing of macro instance validation.

2004-03-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: @author tag recommendation

2004-03-16 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
On Mar 15, 2004, at 11:49 PM, Conor MacNeill wrote: As a result, I would like to open a discussion on the ant-dev list to see the impact of this change in policy, particularly on non-committers - i.e. the people who make the odd, but important, contribution to the project, people who may become