DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19301] - junitreport fails for long string literals

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/etc/checkstyle checkstyle-frames.xsl checkstyle-text.xsl checkstyle-xdoc.xsl

antoine 2004/02/05 15:49:05 Modified:src/etc/checkstyle checkstyle-frames.xsl checkstyle-text.xsl checkstyle-xdoc.xsl Log: New license Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +15 -52ant/src/etc/checkstyle/checkstyle-frames.xsl Index: checkstyle-fra

cvs commit: ant/src/etc yearcheck.sh changelog.xsl coverage-frames.xsl jdepend-frames.xsl jdepend.xsl log.xsl maudit-frames.xsl mmetrics-frames.xsl tagdiff.xsl

antoine 2004/02/05 15:45:00 Modified:src/etc yearcheck.sh changelog.xsl coverage-frames.xsl jdepend-frames.xsl jdepend.xsl log.xsl maudit-frames.xsl mmetrics-frames.xsl tagdiff.xsl Log: Apache License 2.0 Revision ChangesPath

Re: cvs commit: ant WHATSNEW

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sbailliez2004/02/05 14:55:37 Modified:.WHATSNEW Log: PR: 19301 Use xalan extensions to replace strings and avoid a stack overflow when doing deep recursions. Revision ChangesPath 1.537 +4 -0 ant/WHATSNEW Index: WHATSNEW

cvs commit: ant NOTICE

antoine 2004/02/05 12:13:00 Added: .Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH NOTICE Log: adding NOTICE file Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.1.2.1 +0 -0 ant/NOTICE Index: NOTICE ==

cvs commit: ant NOTICE

antoine 2004/02/05 12:12:12 Added: .NOTICE Log: Added NOTICE file as discussed previously on the development list Revision ChangesPath 1.1 ant/NOTICE Index: NOTICE === =

cvs commit: ant WHATSNEW

sbailliez2004/02/05 14:55:37 Modified:.WHATSNEW Log: PR: 19301 Use xalan extensions to replace strings and avoid a stack overflow when doing deep recursions. Revision ChangesPath 1.537 +4 -0 ant/WHATSNEW Index: WHATSNEW =

cvs commit: ant/src/etc junit-frames.xsl junit-noframes.xsl

sbailliez2004/02/05 14:45:51 Modified:src/etc junit-frames.xsl junit-noframes.xsl Log: PR: 19301 Use xalan extensions to replace strings and avoid a stack overflow when doing deep recursions. Revision ChangesPath 1.17 +18 -77ant/src/etc/junit-frames.xsl

cvs commit: ant bootstrap.sh build.xml

antoine 2004/02/05 12:49:42 Modified:.Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH bootstrap.sh build.xml Log: Merge from HEAD Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.67.2.1 +13 -2 ant/bootstrap.sh Index: bootstrap.sh =

cvs commit: ant bootstrap.sh build.xml

antoine 2004/02/05 12:44:02 Modified:.bootstrap.sh build.xml Log: Added the NOTICE to the metainf dir of ant.jar, ant-launcher.jar and ant-nodeps.jar and also to the distribution files Updated the copyright notice in bootstrap.sh Revision ChangesPath 1.68

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26696] New: - Corrupted zip file

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] Matt Benson as a committer

Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote: I am impressed by the number of contributions to the user list and of patches sent to Bugzilla by Matt Benson. I would like to propose him to become an ant committer. Do you agree [ ] Yes [ ] No Let me start with my +1 Antoine [x] Yes +1 Peter -

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26690] - ZoneInfoMappings

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26690] New: - ZoneInfoMappings

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[VOTE] Matt Benson as a committer

I am impressed by the number of contributions to the user list and of patches sent to Bugzilla by Matt Benson. I would like to propose him to become an ant committer. Do you agree [ ] Yes [ ] No Let me start with my +1 Antoine -

Re: [VOTE] date for 1.6.1 final

Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote: Concerning 1.6.1, the only work I have leftover to do is : put the 2.0 license in 24 scripts, xsl or txt documents + checkin the NOTICE. I plan to do this this evening. Do we want to release 1.6.1 final on Thursday, Feb 12th as proposed previously ? Or do we need to

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/script ant

Stefan Bodewig wrote: Finally the script has to do a lot of stuff to parse the command line and plug it back together again as it now wants to parse some options itself (and hide them from Ant). This is not trivial to do in way that works on all Bourne shell dialects out there, in particular with

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/script ant

On 5 Feb 2004, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * a --noconfig switch that suppresses sourcing of additional > configuration files. this is not the full story, there now also is echo ' --help, --hprint this message and ant help' echo ' --noconfig suppress sourcing

cvs commit: ant/src/script ant

bodewig 2004/02/05 05:09:28 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/launch Launcher.java src/script ant Log: Changes to make Ant installed in JPackage's RPM environment behave a little bit more friendly. * a new system property ant.lib.dir that if set will be use

Re: [VOTE] date for 1.6.1 final

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Thu, 05 Feb 2004, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've one more tiny modification I'd like to do I forgot the ant shell script modifications for jpackage. I have a new patch by Randy Watler that looks promising, I just need to test and integrate it, hope

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18886] - Move files deletes directory if the directory is empty

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26683] - Renaming of nonexistent files deletes the folder

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26683] New: - Renaming of nonexistent files deletes the folder

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] date for 1.6.1 final

On Thu, 05 Feb 2004, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've one more tiny modification I'd like to do I forgot the ant shell script modifications for jpackage. I have a new patch by Randy Watler that looks promising, I just need to test and integrate it, hope I'll do so by tomorrow as

RE: [VOTE] date for 1.6.1 final

> Concerning 1.6.1, the only work I have leftover to do is : > put the 2.0 license in 24 scripts, xsl or txt documents + > checkin the NOTICE. > I plan to do this this evening. > > Do we want to release 1.6.1 final on Thursday, Feb 12th as > proposed previously ? > > Or do we need to wait more

Re: [VOTE] date for 1.6.1 final

On Thu, 05 Feb 2004, Antoine Lévy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Concerning 1.6.1, the only work I have leftover to do is : put the > 2.0 license in 24 scripts, xsl or txt documents + checkin the > NOTICE. I've one more tiny modification I'd like to do - make behave more nicely in a non GU

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26539] - tag cannot suppress xdoclet tags with hyphens

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26539] - tag cannot suppress xdoclet tags with hyphens

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] date for 1.6.1 final

Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote: Concerning 1.6.1, the only work I have leftover to do is : put the 2.0 license in 24 scripts, xsl or txt documents + checkin the NOTICE. I plan to do this this evening. Do we want to release 1.6.1 final on Thursday, Feb 12th as proposed previously ? Yes Or do we need

[VOTE] date for 1.6.1 final

Concerning 1.6.1, the only work I have leftover to do is : put the 2.0 license in 24 scripts, xsl or txt documents + checkin the NOTICE. I plan to do this this evening. Do we want to release 1.6.1 final on Thursday, Feb 12th as proposed previously ? Or do we need to wait more ? [ ] Yes [ ] No Ant

Re: upgrade to License 2.0 on head

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Wed, 04 Feb 2004, Antoine Lévy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Not sure exactly how it should be worded though. Do we want just to check in the above text, "the above text" being section 4 of the 1.1 license. Yes, I think so. See also

Re: upgrade to License 2.0 on head

On Wed, 04 Feb 2004, Antoine Lévy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not sure exactly how it should be worded though. Do we want just to > check in the above text, "the above text" being section 4 of the 1.1 license. Yes, I think so. See also

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25345] - jspc tag broken with new version of jasper

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26570] - duplicate instances of interface com.sun.javadoc.RootDoc loaded

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu