DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24710] - task (not )

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18102] - A new core Task, that applies a Task to all files of a FileSet

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: ant 1.6.1

Steve Cohen wrote: Another issue to consider. I don't know if it's strictly a 1.6.1 issue or further down the line but the ant developers should consider it. I have been working with the jakarta-commons/net project to create a more capable system, able to detect what system its FTPClient class

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26176] - exec does not find executable

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25711] - Perforce task 'p4submit' should *not* set p4.needsresolve to 0 upon success

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/OptionalTasks perforce.html

antoine 2004/01/15 12:48:17 Modified:.Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH WHATSNEW src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/perforce Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH P4Submit.java docs/manual/OptionalTasks Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH perforce.html Added:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26176] - exec does not find executable

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: ant 1.6.1

Another issue to consider. I don't know if it's strictly a 1.6.1 issue or further down the line but the ant developers should consider it. I have been working with the jakarta-commons/net project to create a more capable system, able to detect what system its FTPClient class is connecting with

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26176] - exec does not find executable

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/OptionalTasks perforce.html

antoine 2004/01/15 12:27:07 Modified:.WHATSNEW src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/perforce P4Submit.java docs/manual/OptionalTasks perforce.html Added: src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/optional/perforce

cvs commit: ant/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/optional/perforce - New directory

antoine 2004/01/15 12:23:22 ant/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/optional/perforce - New directory - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26176] - exec does not find executable

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26176] - exec does not find executable

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26108] - delete task fails for jar file in CWD on WNT

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26176] - exec does not find executable

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26176] New: - exec does not find executable

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: New Launcher and JPackage RPMs

I am +1 to get this into ant 1.6.1. Cheers, Antoine Peter Reilly wrote: Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote: Hi Peter, can we improve the new classloader so that the work of inspecting the jars does not happen each time an is done ? Yes by keeping a static map of file->manifest class path. With the follo

Re: New Launcher and JPackage RPMs

Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote: Hi Peter, can we improve the new classloader so that the work of inspecting the jars does not happen each time an is done ? Yes by keeping a static map of file->manifest class path. With the following: Done and the included patch, the time

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26128] - Nested ant invocations can override properties

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: ant 1.6.1

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, My name is Sean Egan. I've been making some changes to the ClearCase package of ANT based on version 1.6.0. These changes are almost finished. I just downloaded the 1.6.0 source and modifed that. How do I go about getting these changes accepted back into the official ve

Re: ant 1.6.1

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Antoine Lévy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: do we want to make ant 1.6.1 next week ? Are there any known important issues pending? I have a Perforce task issue which I want to solve this evening. But I would not call it an important issue.

Re: New Launcher and JPackage RPMs

Hi Peter, can we improve the new classloader so that the work of inspecting the jars does not happen each time an is done ? Antoine Peter Reilly wrote: Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi, today I found myself discussing with the JPackage folks on their list about the problems the RPM setup has with the ne

Re: ant 1.6.1

On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Antoine Lévy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > do we want to make ant 1.6.1 next week ? Are there any known important issues pending? > do we need to make a beta before the release ? Probably yes. Stefan -

ant 1.6.1

Hi, do we want to make ant 1.6.1 next week ? I could release 1.6.1 on Thursday, Jan 22 in the evening (my usual 11pm to 12pm CET) do we need to make a beta before the release ? Antoine - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: New Launcher and JPackage RPMs

Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi, today I found myself discussing with the JPackage folks on their list about the problems the RPM setup has with the new Launcher. They put all the installed jars into a single directory and let config files put together the classpath before they invoke Ant IIUC. So far we'

Usage of ~/.ant

Now that we use ~/.ant/lib shouldn't we move ~/.antrc into ~/.ant as well? Maybe the wrapper script should check for ~/.ant/ant.conf and ignore ~/.antrc if it exists. As an additional step Ant may offer to move a ~/.antrc file, this is what the XEmacs folks did when the moved the contents of ~/.e

New Launcher and JPackage RPMs

Hi, today I found myself discussing with the JPackage folks on their list about the problems the RPM setup has with the new Launcher. They put all the installed jars into a single directory and let config files put together the classpath before they invoke Ant IIUC. So far we've told people that

Re: How about distributing an ant-jsch.jar for Ant 1.5.x?

On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Antoine Lévy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Do we want to bring the ssh code and the TeeOutputStream class into > the ant 1.5 branch so that if there is any maintainance to do there > and that the HEAD branch cannot be used any more for ant 1.5 we are > not stuck. It ma

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks typedef.html

bodewig 2004/01/15 07:08:48 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH typedef.html Log: 2004 Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.10.2.5 +1 -1 ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/typedef.html Index: typedef.html

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks typedef.html

bodewig 2004/01/15 07:02:13 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks typedef.html Log: 2004 Revision ChangesPath 1.14 +1 -1 ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/typedef.html Index: typedef.html === RCS file: /h

Core classloader (1.7)

Hi, I was looking at how to better reuse the classloaders (as part of the fixes for JAXPUtils). In the process I noticed that Project.createClassLoader(Path) does not set Project.getCoreLoader() as the parent of the classloader being created. Actually, except for ExecuteJava.java and WhichResou

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks typedef.html

peterreilly2004/01/15 06:39:29 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH typedef.html Log: sync with head Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.10.2.4 +1 -1 ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/typedef.html Index: t

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks typedef.html

peterreilly2004/01/15 06:38:46 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks typedef.html Log: doc error for "onerror" attribute of typedef/taskdef, warn is actually report Revision ChangesPath 1.13 +1 -1 ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/typedef.html Index: typedef.html

taskdef onerror problem

>From the ANT 1.6 documentation, it says that taskdef is a form of typedef which provides the 'onerror' attribute. The doc then goes on to say... The values are fail - cause a build exception, warn output a warning, but continue, ignore, do nothing. The default is fail. (introduced in ant1.6) ...

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26165] New: - Type checking in JUnit batchtest

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25938] - [PATCH] xdocs/external.xml update

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25938] - [PATCH] xdocs/external.xml update

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26128] - Nested ant invocations can override properties

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26160] - taskdef could not load definitions from resource

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26160] New: - taskdef could not load definitions from resource

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant WHATSNEW

antoine 2004/01/15 00:43:05 Modified:.WHATSNEW Log: remove entry concerning xdoclet in proposal/xdocs Revision ChangesPath 1.524 +0 -2 ant/WHATSNEW Index: WHATSNEW === RCS file: /hom

Re: How about distributing an ant-jsch.jar for Ant 1.5.x?

Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi, Rob Anderson, the initial author of the SSH tasks in 1.6 has looked into what is needed to create a jar that allows the SSH tasks to be used with Ant 1.5.[1] It may be a good idea to put together a small jar with the required classes from 1.6 and distribute it for people w

RE: How about distributing an ant-jsch.jar for Ant 1.5.x?

> Rob Anderson, the initial author of the SSH tasks in 1.6 has looked > into what is needed to create a jar that allows the SSH tasks to be > used with Ant 1.5.[1] > > It may be a good idea to put together a small jar with the required > classes from 1.6 and distribute it for people who are stuck

How about distributing an ant-jsch.jar for Ant 1.5.x?

Hi, Rob Anderson, the initial author of the SSH tasks in 1.6 has looked into what is needed to create a jar that allows the SSH tasks to be used with Ant 1.5.[1] It may be a good idea to put together a small jar with the required classes from 1.6 and distribute it for people who are stuck with An

Re: cvs commit: ant WHATSNEW

On 14 Jan 2004, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > add a blurb about the xdoclet update I don't think we should track the proposals in this file, in particular since it is the source for release notes of releases that don't include the proposals at all. Stefan --

RE: Capturing the output of a ClearCase command from Exec

Let me see what happens on 1) Which class implements oata/taskdefs/default.properties: exec=org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.ExecTask 2) What happens there (simplified)? private Redirector redirector = new Redirector(this); public void setOutput(File out) { redirector.setOutput(ou

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26148] New: - Attrib task only outputs blank lines

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: ant xdocs proposals

On Jan 14, 2004, at 3:18 PM, Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote: The advantage of generating the xdocs from build/classes is that it makes the development cycle a bit shorter. For instance, if you add a new task in your development workspace, then you can generate the xdocs as soon as you have compiled t