DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25868] - JAVAC debug=off attribute is inconsistent among jikes and javac compiler

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25868] - JAVAC debug=off attribute is inconsistent among jikes and javac compiler

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25868] New: - JAVAC debug=off attribute is inconsistent among jikes and javac compiler

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: a comment about xml namespace

I have only followed this discussion peripherally at best, and I know it has been going on for a while, so I am almost certainly be missing information from previous posts, but here's what strikes me as potentially reasonable... and thus represents my initial expectations of what I will find when I

Re: a comment about xml namespace

This seems to be an incomplete version of what I wrote and does not match what I find in my sent folder. I will try again and hope I don't spam you all too much. my mail client seems to be acting funny. Appologies. -Gus Gus Heck wrote: I have only followed this discussion peripherally at best, a

Re: a comment about xml namespace

I have only followed this discussion peripherally at best, and I know it has been going on for a while, so I am almost certainly be missing information from previous posts, but here's what strikes me as potentially reasonable... and thus represents my initial expectations of what I will find wh

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25832] - Do not define twice

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: ScriptDef revisited

Peter, this sounds fantastic and really think something like this task should be part of the standard distribution (optional tasks). Does the code depends on ANT1.7 features? Or is it usable in 1.6? Jose Alberto -Original Message- From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC

RE: Selecting XML Parsers

From: Jim Fuller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Since v7.1 Saxon is not bound to Aelfred xml parser, and doesn't ship with it, Saxon will use by default JVM parser if Aelfred is not on the classpath...I am running v7.8 s