DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24367] - Fileset exclude in zip task does not exclude ./*

2003-11-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Brent Rector on Msbuild vs Ant

2003-11-04 Thread Dominique Devienne
> From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 1. Ant does not provide built-in target dependency analysis -a > requirement for a scalable build system > > [This has no impact on build files, merely effort to write new tasks. We > do leave it to tasks, but they get to implement their own lo

Brent Rector on Msbuild vs Ant

2003-11-04 Thread Steve Loughran
Here is the offending page from Brent's book. I think it will be on the MSDN web site before long, as it is the chapter promised this month - http://msdn.microsoft.com/Longhorn/understanding/books/rector/default.aspx I have added my commentary. This is the last paragraph on chapter 2, just after

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24411] New: - odd presetdef behavior with "additive" task parameters like javac srcdir

2003-11-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24367] - Fileset exclude in zip task does not exclude ./*

2003-11-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Msbuild

2003-11-04 Thread Steve Loughran
Stefan Bodewig wrote: It's even worse than that. NAnt gets some bad coverage in a Microsoft Press book they've distributed at PDC from what I hear. I have this book in my hands. It does not criticise NAnt. It criticises Ant. I will follow up with the details shortly.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24367] - Fileset exclude in zip task does not exclude ./*

2003-11-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Tagdiff reports no new files with CVS 1.11.9

2003-11-04 Thread Anderson, Robert H - MWT
It appears that the output from the cvs rdiff command has changed slightly for new files... CVS 1.11 File apps/websphere/lib/something.jar is new; current revision 1.2 CVS 1.11.9 File apps/websphere/lib/something.jar is new; cvstag_2003_11_03_2 revision 1.2 The CvsTagDiff.java has the old output

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24406] - Tagdiff reports no new files with CVS 1.11.9

2003-11-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24406] New: - Tagdiff reports no new files with CVS 1.11.9

2003-11-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Msbuild

2003-11-04 Thread Steve Loughran
Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Mon, 03 Nov 2003, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I must say it is the first time any project I've worked on has been cloned by microsoft to become a strategic offering of theirs. Yes, a very interesting experience. Well, as David Patterson says, the hard part

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24280] - Empty value attribute for behaves differently on Windows and Unix

2003-11-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23602] - Zip task STILL creates zip files incompatible with Winzip

2003-11-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24367] - Fileset exclude in zip task does not exclude ./*

2003-11-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23602] - Zip task STILL creates zip files incompatible with Winzip

2003-11-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Misleading error reporting with s

2003-11-04 Thread peter reilly
On Monday 03 November 2003 17:54, Dominique Devienne wrote: > > From: peter reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > On Monday 03 November 2003 16:51, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]$ ant -f import_import_import_bad_import.xml > > > Buildfile: import_import_import_bad_import.xml

Re: Msbuild

2003-11-04 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 03 Nov 2003, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I must say it is the first time any project I've worked on has been > cloned by microsoft to become a strategic offering of theirs. Yes, a very interesting experience. > I also think they may have a better list/set model than Ant's

Sample antlet was: Proposal: Ant AntLet(s) : Subproject or New Feature

2003-11-04 Thread Nick Chalko
Here is what I think antlets might look like. I have experimented with the code and it works see http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?AntProjectPages/AntletSample Antlets are designed to be (optionally) downloaded

Re: Proposal: Ant AntLet(s) : Subproject or New Feature

2003-11-04 Thread Nick Chalko
I really think Ant is ready to step up the amount of reuse it provides to the develpoment community. An Apache Ant subproject to develop and maintian a set of build targets for specific build steps is a very worthy goal. R, Nick --

Proposal: Ant AntLet(s) : Subproject or New Feature

2003-11-04 Thread Nick Chalko
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?AntProjectPages/AntletProposal = (0) rationale = With Ant 1.6 there are new features of and that support re-use. Still, however, Ant is a framework/toolkit for building, but it does not provide any out-of-the-box build solution. Simple tasks are rep