DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22919] New: - cvs does not execute if cvs bin directory in path statement is enclosed in quotes.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Why the latest build requires explicit for

Is it possible to add '-explain' option to see the real reason why a task cannot be instantiated? - Alexey. -- { http://trelony.cjb.net/ } Alexey N. Solofnenko Pleasant Hill, CA (GMT-8 usually) Steve Loughran wrote: Alexey N. Solofnenko wrote: ANT lists a lot of reasons why it cannot instantiate

Re: Why the latest build requires explicit for

Alexey N. Solofnenko wrote: ANT lists a lot of reasons why it cannot instantiate the task (standard problem report). It would be better if it reported an exception. Ant lists a lot of reasons because they are the underlying causes of most instantiation problems, and when we didnt do that we got a

antcall and build.xml being modified.

Consider the following build file: When it is run the output is as follows: Buildfile: build.xml test: echotarget: [echo] echotarget: [echo] echotarget: [echo] BUILD SUCCESSFUL Total time: 3 seconds I figured the output would h

.net tasks and mono

I've been thinking about the .net tasks and the tricks we had to do with mono support the underlying problem was that because the task was always explicitly importing lots of stuff from the .net framework, the defaultreferences attribute was overloaded. But it turns out that the MS CSC compile

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Execute.java ExecuteJava.java ExecuteOn.java Exit.java Input.java

jhm 2003/09/03 09:47:18 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Execute.java ExecuteJava.java ExecuteOn.java Exit.java Input.java Log: Checkstyle Revision ChangesPath 1.65 +4 -2 ant/src/main/org/apache/

Re: Why the latest build requires explicit for

ANT lists a lot of reasons why it cannot instantiate the task (standard problem report). It would be better if it reported an exception. - Alexey. Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Tue, 02 Sep 2003, Alexey N. Solofnenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have updated ANT from main branch and now I have to ad

Re: Getting 1.6 out the door

Costin Manolache wrote: Dominique Devienne wrote: As I've been saying all along, lets just introduce a new (unique) notion for attribute/variable expansion (at use time rather than definition time), which is something new in Ant anyhow. No (or less?) backward compatibility issues, and makes it p

Re: Ant deprecated tasks policy

Steve Cohen wrote: Hmm, since we're cutting the umbilical cord to java 1.1 with ant 1.6, might it not be time to revisit this policy? It makes more sense for optional tasks, especially given the big diff between the old ST task and the new ones --

Re: Request: "ant -projecthelp" is way too complicated!

Conor MacNeill wrote: I don't really see a need to abbreviate those options. You're going to be typing in a classname anyway so no big savings. I would add -p for -projecthelp because it is a common operation +1 for an abbreviation for this; -ph is ok with me -version is not a common operation

Re: Why the latest build requires explicit for

I saw somewhere that Rhino is required for script task, but it actually requires BSF. I do not use Rhino, but Jython. Maybe this is the reason. - Alexey. -- { http://trelony.cjb.net/ } Alexey N. Solofnenko Pleasant Hill, CA (GMT-8 usually) peter reilly wrote: Some of the optional tasks will appea

RE: Getting 1.6 out the door

> -Original Message- > From: Costin Manolache [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > As I've been saying all along, lets just introduce a new (unique) notion > > for attribute/variable expansion (at use time rather than definition > > time), which > > is something new in Ant anyhow. No (or less?)

Re: [GUMP] Test Failure - Ant

Yes, the failure of the exec test might be a timing issue, the testcase contains a hard-coded maximum time to start a small shell script. I am going to increase this time. Cheers, Antoine - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant Project.java

jhm 2003/09/03 08:22:10 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant Project.java Log: Let Project.toBoolean(String) handle null as argument. Revision ChangesPath 1.152 +5 -6 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/Project.java Index: Project.java

cvs commit: ant WHATSNEW

jhm 2003/09/03 08:22:10 Modified:.WHATSNEW Log: Let Project.toBoolean(String) handle null as argument. Revision ChangesPath 1.496 +4 -1 ant/WHATSNEW Index: WHATSNEW === RCS file:

RE: Ant deprecated tasks policy

As a fairly silent observer, it would seem that Ant could remove all this deprecated... stuff with a move to 2.0. During that move, lots of unsightliness could be cleaned up, without the need for a migration to a new core. > -Original Message- > From: Steve Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant Main.java

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant Main.java > Log: > New shortcuts for ant options: > -d --> -debug > -e --> -emacs > -h --> -help > -p --> -projecthelp > -s --> -find What about

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant Main.java

could you please also update docs/manual/running.html? Thanks Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant Main.java

jhm 2003/09/03 07:19:07 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant Main.java Log: New shortcuts for ant options: -d --> -debug -e --> -emacs -h --> -help -p --> -projecthelp -s --> -find Revision ChangesPath 1.93 +12 -12ant/src/main/org/apache

cvs commit: ant WHATSNEW

jhm 2003/09/03 07:19:07 Modified:.WHATSNEW Log: New shortcuts for ant options: -d --> -debug -e --> -emacs -h --> -help -p --> -projecthelp -s --> -find Revision ChangesPath 1.495 +4 -1 ant/WHATSNEW Index: WHATSNEW =

cvs commit: ant WHATSNEW

peterreilly2003/09/03 06:54:16 Modified:.WHATSNEW Log: Describe incompatable change introduced with enablemultiplemapping mode for copy and move. Revision ChangesPath 1.494 +4 -0 ant/WHATSNEW Index: WHATSNEW ==

RE: Timestamp attribute processing

You can see the patch I submitted here: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20578 -Original Message- From: Ken Gentle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 3:27 PM To: Ant Developers List Subject: RE: Timestamp attribute processing At 02:52 PM 9/2/200

malicious subscribe

Sorry for any disturbance, I didn't subscribe to this list and have now unsubscribed. - David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs AntLikeTasksAtTopLevelTest.java

On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 08:42 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 3 Sep 2003, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Throw an exception instead of looping forever in top-level <*ant*> > > task. > > does need the same treatment? What happens if a build file > tries to import itself? > I think it is handled - s

Re: Why the latest build requires explicit for

On Tue, 02 Sep 2003, Alexey N. Solofnenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have updated ANT from main branch and now I have to add Why do you need to taskdef it explicitly? I.e. what happens if you don't? Stefan - To unsubscrib

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs AntLikeTasksAtTopLevelTest.java

On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Note that one can still cause infinite loops with > antcall: > > > > > > > > > > True, but there are too many cases where you cannot detect the case without actually running the build. has always thrown an e

RE: Ant deprecated tasks policy

Hmm, since we're cutting the umbilical cord to java 1.1 with ant 1.6, might it not be time to revisit this policy? -Original Message- From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed 9/3/2003 1:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject:Re: Ant deprecated tasks

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs AntLikeTasksAtTopLevelTest.java

Import checks if the file has already been imported: So importing the current build file would import it once. The following import.xml: Hello World Using ant -f import.xml prints out "Hello World" twice. Note that one can still cause infinite loops with antcall:

RE: Request: "ant -projecthelp" is way too complicated!

And tomorrow not as error :-) Jan > -Original Message- > From: Conor MacNeill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 11:56 AM > To: Ant Developers List > Subject: Re: Request: "ant -projecthelp" is way too complicated! > > > > > > Additional -h for -help? > > I

Re: Request: "ant -projecthelp" is way too complicated!

> > Additional -h for -help? > I will do that. > You know if you use -h you do get help :-) Just joking. Conor - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs AntLikeTasksAtTopLevelTest.java

On 3 Sep 2003, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Throw an exception instead of looping forever in top-level <*ant*> > task. does need the same treatment? What happens if a build file tries to import itself? Stefan - To unsubsc

Re: Why the latest build requires explicit for

Some of the optional tasks will appear not to be present if their required 3'rd party jars are not present. In scriptdef's case, the jar needed is bsf.jar (from jakarta http://jakarta.apache.org/bsf/ for 1.6) and it should be in the same classloader as optional.jar (easiest is to place the jars in

cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs AntLikeTasksAtTopLevelTest.java

bodewig 2003/09/03 03:03:47 Modified:.WHATSNEW docs/manual using.html docs/manual/CoreTasks ant.html antcall.html subant.html src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Ant.java SubAnt.java Added: src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant

cvs commit: ant build.xml

bodewig 2003/09/03 03:01:30 Modified:.build.xml Log: StyleTest seems to require a TraX implementation Revision ChangesPath 1.392 +2 -0 ant/build.xml Index: build.xml === RCS file: /h

cvs commit: ant/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs toplevelant.xml toplevelantcall.xml toplevelsubant.xml

bodewig 2003/09/03 01:37:56 Added: src/etc/testcases/taskdefs toplevelant.xml toplevelantcall.xml toplevelsubant.xml Log: Examples of infinite loops, PR 22759 Revision ChangesPath 1.1 ant/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/toplevelant.xm

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual install.html

bodewig 2003/09/03 01:02:13 Modified:docs/manual Tag: ANT_15_BRANCH install.html Log: Use valid URLs even in the text links, some people use copy'n'paste instead of clicking links Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.29.2

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual install.html

bodewig 2003/09/03 00:58:04 Modified:docs/manual install.html Log: Use valid URLs even in the text links, some people use copy'n'paste instead of clicking links Revision ChangesPath 1.59 +19 -19ant/docs/manual/install.html Index: install.html

RE: Request: "ant -projecthelp" is way too complicated!

> I don't really see a need to abbreviate those options. You're > going to be > typing in a classname anyway so no big savings. yep, sounds right. > I would add -p for -projecthelp because it is a common operation > -version is not a common operation so no need for an > abbreviation. Likewi

Re: Request: "ant -projecthelp" is way too complicated!

On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 04:57 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 03:55 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I want to introcude some "shortcuts". How about that: > > > > I think each option should have a full work version and > > optionally a single > > letter shortcut. I don't like the a

RE: [GUMP] Test Failure - Ant

I followed the link provided in the first mail and there the test failed ... Jan > -Original Message- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 9:23 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Su

Re: [GUMP] Test Failure - Ant

On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Jan Materne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Which one? There failed more than one: The exec test didn't fail on my machine last night, I assumed (without cross-checking) the failures on Sam's machine would be the same as on mine. May be a timing issue. Stefan -

RE: [GUMP] Test Failure - Ant

Which one? There failed more than one: Testsuite: org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.ExecTaskTest Testcase: testspawn(org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.ExecTaskTest): FAILED log file found after spawn ... at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.ExecTaskTest.testspawn(ExecTaskTest.java:134) Testsuite: org.apach

Re: [GUMP] Test Failure - Ant

jakarta-regexp has changed it jar location (Gump knows about that now) so Xalan didn't build. The failing test is a test that requires Xalan but isn't excluded in case it cannot be found. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

[GUMP] Test Failure - Ant

This email is autogenerated from the output from: Build results exceed maximum length. Please see URL above for details. Last 50 li

RE: Request: "ant -projecthelp" is way too complicated!

> On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 03:55 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I want to introcude some "shortcuts". How about that: > > > > I think each option should have a full work version and > optionally a single > letter shortcut. I don't like the abbreviations. > > Conor Some suggestions for -logfile

Re: Request: "ant -projecthelp" is way too complicated!

On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 03:55 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I want to introcude some "shortcuts". How about that: > I think each option should have a full work version and optionally a single letter shortcut. I don't like the abbreviations. Conor ---

Re: Ant deprecated tasks policy

On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Steve Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What is our policy on getting rid of these deprecated methods? So far it has been "Do nothing, keep the deprecated stuff forever". Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [E

Re: problem with subscribing to ant-user list

On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, James Carpenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To subscribe to the user list I sent the usual empty email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] but never received the confirmation > message. This should work. Apache's mail servers are under heavy load because of Sobig.F (and even more so beca

RE: Request: "ant -projecthelp" is way too complicated!

I want to introcude some "shortcuts". How about that: present: -quiet, -q be extra quiet -verbose, -v be extra verbose -logfile use given file for log -l '' -buildfile use given buildfile -file '' -f

RE: Why the latest build requires explicit for

Optional and core tasks are available by standard. Ant uses the org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/default.properties in %ant.home%/lib/ant.jar for "taskdefing" these tasks. You donÂt have to that task, because this task is defined near line 196 scriptdef=org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.scri

Ant deprecated tasks policy

There is a task that has been deprecated, since 1.4.x, in favor of . What is our policy on getting rid of these deprecated methods? 1.6 certainly feels like the right time to do this to me. I don't think I've had a single support request for this antiquated task, which at any rate precedes my

RE: Getting 1.6 out the door

Dominique Devienne wrote: > As I've been saying all along, lets just introduce a new (unique) notion > for attribute/variable expansion (at use time rather than definition > time), which > is something new in Ant anyhow. No (or less?) backward compatibility > issues, and makes it plain and obvio

RE: Verify dev@ant.apache.org for dduncan@hexi.com

-Original Message- From: David Duncan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 9:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Verify [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi! Your message has been received, but it hasn't been delivered to me yet. Since I don't have any r

Verify dev@ant.apache.org for dduncan@hexi.com

Hi! Your message has been received, but it hasn't been delivered to me yet. Since I don't have any record of your sending me mail from this address before, I need to verify that you're not a spammer. Please just hit 'Reply' and send this message back to me, and your previous message will be del

Why the latest build requires explicit for

Hello, I have updated ANT from main branch and now I have to add in order to use task. But the generates "Trying to override old definition of datatype scriptdef" warning. What can be wrong? - Alexey. -- { http://trelony.cjb.net/ } Alexey N. Solofnenko Pleasant Hill, CA (GMT-8 usually)

Why the latest build requires explicit for

Hello, I have updated ANT from main branch and now I have to add in order to use task. But the generates "Trying to override old definition of datatype scriptdef" warning. What can be wrong? - Alexey. -- { http://trelony.cjb.net/ } Alexey N. Solofnenko Pleasant Hill, CA (GMT-8 usually) -