DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22865] - Zip whenempty attribute is broken

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22901] - [Patch] -only option to execute target(s) without dependencies

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22901] New: - [Patch] -only option to execute target(s) without dependencies

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22877] - cvstagdiff support for cvs module aliases

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22863] - Can't just rename a directory with the move task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Timestamp attribute processing

Ken Gentle wrote: At 12:56 PM 9/2/2003, you wrote: Steve Cohen wrote: Hmm, that's weaker than I would have expected. If I'd like something a little better, is your recommendation then to add to DateUtils? I guess it is time for a date type. I imagine taking java.util.Calendar as a param would b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22759] - antcall at top level causes infinite loop

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22896] New: - The webinc directive for the jspc task does not work

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22834] - XSLT fails transforming file with doctype

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22889] New: - Add string formatting options to

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22877] - cvstagdiff support for cvs module aliases

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Timestamp attribute processing

At 02:52 PM 9/2/2003, you wrote: I appreciate what you are saying. What I did so far, and none of it has been submitted yet, was to code my task to accept either of the ISO8601 formats in DateUtils (-MM-ddThh:mm:ss or -MM-dd) if no format is specified by the user, OR if the user specifies a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22883] New: - Enhancement to pvcs Operational Task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22759] - antcall at top level causes infinite loop

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22863] - Can't just rename a directory with the move task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

problem with subscribing to ant-user list

For some reason I am having trouble subscribing to the ant-user mailing list, although I was able to subscribe to this dev list without problems. I tried several times, both today and yesterday. To subscribe to the user list I sent the usual empty email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but never received the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15729] - StarTeam rootLocalFolder should be java.io.File

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22877] - cvstagdiff support for cvs module aliases

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Timestamp attribute processing

Sounds good. Cheers, Antoine - Original Message - From: "Steve Cohen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 8:52 PM Subject: RE: Timestamp attribute processing I appreciate what you are saying. What I did so far, and none

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22859] - Cross buildfile dependency

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Timestamp attribute processing

I appreciate what you are saying. What I did so far, and none of it has been submitted yet, was to code my task to accept either of the ISO8601 formats in DateUtils (-MM-ddThh:mm:ss or -MM-dd) if no format is specified by the user, OR if the user specifies a time format in the parameters

Re: [VOTE] Ant/Antcall Returning properties and references [WAS] Re: ant 1.5.4 : Import

Dominique -- Dang, I didn't know there was a competition going on! I wrote most of the Antelope tasks because I had a specific need. Feel free to grab what you want and put it in Ant-contrib. I like your "loophole" for your "antreturn" task, I didn't like the code reuse either, but the way the "

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22834] - XSLT fails transforming file with doctype

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22859] - Cross buildfile dependency

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22774] - [PATCH] Allow reallyquiet (-Q) to task.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Timestamp attribute processing

At 12:56 PM 9/2/2003, you wrote: Steve Cohen wrote: Hmm, that's weaker than I would have expected. If I'd like something a little better, is your recommendation then to add to DateUtils? I guess it is time for a date type. I imagine taking java.util.Calendar as a param would be a nice way to map

RE: Timestamp attribute processing

This is why I don't want to use it. The starTeam API has a method to make an OLEDate (which it requires) out of a java.util.Date, and that's all I need. All I'm saying is that Ant should do the parsing in java, and only convert the result to an OLEDate right before it passes it to the Starteam AP

Re: Timestamp attribute processing

Steve Cohen wrote: Hmm, that's weaker than I would have expected. If I'd like something a little better, is your recommendation then to add to DateUtils? I guess it is time for a date type. I imagine taking java.util.Calendar as a param would be a nice way to map it (or Date, though that one's l

Re: Getting 1.6 out the door

Gus Heck wrote, On 02/09/2003 17.26: ... From Nicola Ken Barozzi: >Imports should be reusable bits of builds. But instead they carry the baggage >of targets. With macrodef I can finally *create tasks using Ant*. And so Ant becomes an xml based programming language? Writing tasks in java seems

Re: Getting 1.6 out the door

On Tuesday 02 September 2003 16:26, Gus Heck wrote: > >> follows (I think) the same rules of properties as > >> with > >> inheritall=yes. > > Modeling after antcall...? I am wary of this as antcall is broken at the > top level. > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22759 I certainly

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks exec.html

jhm 2003/09/02 09:24:02 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks exec.html Log: spell check Revision ChangesPath 1.32 +1 -1 ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/exec.html Index: exec.html === RCS file: /hom

cvs commit: ant/xdocs contributors.xml

jhm 2003/09/02 09:17:40 Modified:docs contributors.html xdocscontributors.xml Log: Add some infos about myself. Revision ChangesPath 1.29 +6 -1 ant/docs/contributors.html Index: contributors.html

RE: Getting 1.6 out the door

> From: peter reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Property interceptors are not part of Ant, and might never > be for that > > matter. Using a notation that mimicks interceptors is > probably not a > > good idea either. > > > > As I've been saying all along, lets just introduce a ne

Re: Getting 1.6 out the door

Steve Loughran wrote: Gus Heck wrote: I don't think there's such a thing as experimental stuff. It's either in or not, and once in, it must be backward compatible. I'm sorry so few people chimed in on the subject of overloading the meaning of ${name} in Ant. If this could be changed, then I'd h

Re: Getting 1.6 out the door

Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: peter reilly wrote, On 01/09/2003 20.10: On Monday 01 September 2003 16:43, Dominique Devienne wrote: ... It's not all about power, or one would use a real programming language like Perl or Python. , although powerful, complexifies the rules of Ant, namely the property e

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22877] - cvstagdiff support for cvs module aliases

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22888] New: - using regex package when optional.jar is not on classpath

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22877] - cvstagdiff support for cvs module aliases

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: patch.xml and .cvsignore

On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Larry Shatzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If we add patch.txt and patch.tar.gz to the .cvsignore in the root > directory, this solves this problem. Yep, thanks. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EM

cvs commit: ant patch.xml

bodewig 2003/09/02 07:54:14 Modified:.patch.xml Log: fix inconsistent handling of cvs.found - fail if we cannot use CVS Revision ChangesPath 1.6 +3 -1 ant/patch.xml Index: patch.xml

cvs commit: ant .cvsignore

bodewig 2003/09/02 07:49:38 Modified:..cvsignore Log: exclude patch.txt and patch.tar.gz to make patch.xml more useful Revision ChangesPath 1.10 +2 -1 ant/.cvsignore Index: .cvsignore ===

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs AbstractCvsTask.java

bodewig 2003/09/02 07:38:19 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks cvs.html src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs AbstractCvsTask.java Log: Add a reallyquiet attribute to . PR: 22774 Submitted by: Larry Shatzer Revision ChangesPath 1.18 +29 -23ant

cvs commit: ant/src/etc/checkstyle checkstyle-frames.xsl

jhm 2003/09/02 04:36:03 Modified:src/etc/checkstyle checkstyle-frames.xsl Log: Display number of the column where the "error" occured (if present). Revision ChangesPath 1.4 +3 -4 ant/src/etc/checkstyle/checkstyle-frames.xsl Index: checkstyle-frames.xsl

RE: can't build ant 1.6

1.3 -Original Message- From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 11:04 PM To: Ant Developers List Subject: Re: can't build ant 1.6 Steve Cohen wrote: > I've received no replies to this, so let me try again with a little > more information. Previo

RE: Timestamp attribute processing

Actually, what about the TSTAMP formats? These are probably the most common in Ant. I think what I will do is accept either "MMdd hhmm" or "MMdd" unless user specifies something else. It's not much harder to do this than to enforce one person's idea of the "right way". -Original

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22877] - cvstagdiff support for cvs module aliases

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22877] - cvstagdiff support for cvs module aliases

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22877] New: - cvstagdiff support for cvs module aliases

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Timestamp attribute processing

On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Steve Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've put this logic into StarTeamCheckout, I'd say put it into DateUtils. > because DateUtils seems to have a somewhat different purpose (like > getPhaseOfMoon()??? :-) ) That's been fun to code. If you want to know why I've written

Re: Getting 1.6 out the door

> > > 3. and > > > > > a) resolution of properties > > The issue here is that properties get resolved when the > > macro is used and not when the macro is defined. > > I think that it would be difficult to resolve the > > properties correctly when the macro is defined. > > >

Re: Timestamp attribute processing

there also is a datetime attribute in . Would be nice to unify them - at least Java code wise. On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (with a hardcoded US locale, looks like the europeans (continentals) > are not allowed to enter DD-MM- dates, MM-DD- is pre

Re: can't build ant 1.6

On Tue, 2 Sep 2003 03:14 am, Steve Cohen wrote: > I've received no replies to this, so let me try again with a little more > information. Previous versions of build.sh (or build.bat) contained this > sequence: > I assume you have the latest from CVS - nothing sticky? > > The difference is that

RE: Timestamp attribute processing

BTW, your first post was to the old adress "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". Maybe your adress book isn´t uptodate :-) Jan > -Original Message- > From: Steve Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 4:37 AM > To: Ant Developers List > Subject: RE: Timestamp attribute proce

Re: can't build ant 1.6

Steve Cohen wrote: I've received no replies to this, so let me try again with a little more information. Previous versions of build.sh (or build.bat) contained this sequence: LOCALCLASSPATH=lib/xercesImpl.jar:lib/xml-apis.jar:bootstrap/lib/ant.jar # add in the dependency .jar files DIRLIBS=lib/

RE: Timestamp attribute processing

I've decided to do the following: I allow user to optionally specify a SimpleDateFormat String. If they don't do that, my routine will try by default DateUtils.ISO8601_DATETIME_PATTERN and if that fails, then DateUtils.ISO8601_DATE_PATTERN. If a format is supplied and fails or if one isn't sup