Re: Getting 1.6 out the door

Conor MacNeill wrote: There are surely others so let me know. What about try/catch, BTW? Can we pull in the ant-contrib version so it is 'blessed' with official approval? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additiona

Re: Getting 1.6 out the door

Gus Heck wrote: I don't think there's such a thing as experimental stuff. It's either in or not, and once in, it must be backward compatible. I'm sorry so few people chimed in on the subject of overloading the meaning of ${name} in Ant. If this could be changed, then I'd have an enthusiastic +

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22807] New: - No copyright in antRun.pl

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Getting 1.6 out the door

I don't think there's such a thing as experimental stuff. It's either in or not, and once in, it must be backward compatible. I'm sorry so few people chimed in on the subject of overloading the meaning of ${name} in Ant. If this could be changed, then I'd have an enthusiastic +1, but as it stands,

Re: Getting 1.6 out the door

On Thursday, August 28, 2003, at 09:07 AM, Conor MacNeill wrote: Hi all, What I'd suggest is that soon we branch 1.6 and remove anything that is still settling down. I think we have a few ideas that need to be kicked around before we feel comfortable with them. This work can continue on the HE

Re: Getting 1.6 out the door

Conor MacNeill wrote: Hi all, I've been a bit busy lately so still catching up on issues. I'd really like to get Ant 1.6 out there. There are a bucket load of bugs that we've fixed and improvements we've made that should get out there, judging by bug reports. +1 What I'd suggest is that soon we

Re: [VOTE] Ant/Antcall Returning properties and references [WAS] Re: ant 1.5.4 : Import

Hello, As I am not a commiter i don't may vote, but i would like to explain my point of view on this proposal. I don't think that it is a good way. because ant build file are not script file and include some returning sub project will be use as a function : this is the first foot to scripting lang

RE: Getting 1.6 out the door

> -Original Message- > From: Antoine Levy-Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > From: "Conor MacNeill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > 1. > > I would also go for it as it is. +1. I'm awaiting eagerly too. > > 2. antlib > > I have not tested it myself, but we need to release the fe

Re: exec cp won't work -- cannot stat existing file

Ben Pracht wrote: Because the copy task won't copy symlinks on Linux, I'm using an exec task. Unfortunately, it keeps giving me this message: [exec] Current OS is Linux [exec] Executing 'cp' with arguments: [exec] '/home/bpracht/xks/current/internal/debug/Linux/2.4.18-14debug/i386/x

RE: [VOTE] Ant/Antcall Returning properties and references [WAS]Re: ant 1.5.4 : Import

> From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > > So far, I have got two +1 (myself and Jan Materne) for this > proposal. > > The vote will be closed tomorrow at 12:28 pm CET (20 hours > from now). > > Three +1s are required for a code change, so, by the lik

exec cp won't work -- cannot stat existing file

Because the copy task won't copy symlinks on Linux, I'm using an exec task. Unfortunately, it keeps giving me this message: [exec] Current OS is Linux [exec] Executing 'cp' with arguments: [exec] '/home/bpracht/xks/current/internal/debug/Linux/2.4.18-14debug/i386/xml4c/lib/*' [e

Re: Getting 1.6 out the door

- Original Message - From: "Conor MacNeill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 3:07 PM Subject: Getting 1.6 out the door > Hi all, > > I've been a bit busy lately so still catching up on issues. I'd really like to > get Ant 1.6 out there. There ar

Re: [VOTE] Ant/Antcall Returning properties and references [WAS] Re: ant 1.5.4 : Import

Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: So far, I have got two +1 (myself and Jan Materne) for this proposal. The vote will be closed tomorrow at 12:28 pm CET (20 hours from now). Three +1s are required for a code change, so, by the likes of it, the vote will have a negative result. The , , tasks of Antelope

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs JavaTest.java

Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Steve, can you check that you are happy with this ? will do; there is a test in java that has been turned off for 18 months as it would kill the testing app - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Getting 1.6 out the door

Hi all, I've been a bit busy lately so still catching up on issues. I'd really like to get Ant 1.6 out there. There are a bucket load of bugs that we've fixed and improvements we've made that should get out there, judging by bug reports. What I'd suggest is that soon we branch 1.6 and remove a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22793] New: - Comment support in ZipTask

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: [VOTE] Ant/Antcall Returning properties and references [WAS] Re: ant 1.5.4 : Import

> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I'd like to explore the needs that is driving this specific feature > request - and see whether there is a different way to meet it. > or will allow you to import a set of properties (or > property setting tasks) f

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22533] - [PATCH] Adding Permissions / Security Manager to Java task and JUnit task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] Adding Permissions / Security Manager to Java task and JUnit task

On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > does gump start ant builds in a new VM ? Each project in a VM of its own, yes. > Can it be that the security manager which gump is using is > preventing these permissions from being granted in ant ? I don't think that there

Re: [VOTE] Ant/Antcall Returning properties and references [WAS] Re: ant 1.5.4 : Import

On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So far, I have got two +1 (myself and Jan Materne) for this > proposal. Just a quick comment from myself. I don't really like the idea of turning into a method call, that's why I won't give you a positive vote - unless I can

Re: [VOTE] Ant/Antcall Returning properties and references [WAS] Re: ant 1.5.4 : Import

So far, I have got two +1 (myself and Jan Materne) for this proposal. The vote will be closed tomorrow at 12:28 pm CET (20 hours from now). Three +1s are required for a code change, so, by the likes of it, the vote will have a negative result. The , , tasks of Antelope provide functionality in te

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19237] - SSHExec task should fail if remote command fails

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19249] - javadoc @doclet.ins equivalent

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19249] - javadoc @doclet.ins equivalent

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19249] - javadoc @doclet.ins equivalent

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19237] - SSHExec task should fail if remote command fails

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19237] - SSHExec task should fail if remote command fails

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Request

On Wednesday, August 27, 2003, at 07:06 PM, Martin Gainty wrote: when build.properties contains j2ee.home=J:/J2EE/j2ee_sdk_win ant builds correctly When build.properties contains j2ee.home=J:\J2EE\j2ee_sdk_win ant doesnt build because it cannot resolve JAVA_HOME PLEASE make the forward and back sl

Re: Request

Will do- -Martin - Original Message - From: "Antoine Levy-Lambert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 7:03 AM Subject: Re: Request > Martin, > you should write : > j2ee.home=J:\\J2EE\\j2ee_sdk_win > > properties are read wit

Re: Request

Martin, you should write : j2ee.home=J:\\J2EE\\j2ee_sdk_win properties are read with java.util.Properties#load the backslash must be escaped. Antoine - Original Message - From: "Martin Gainty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 1:06 AM Subject: R

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs JavaTest.java

Steve, can you check that you are happy with this ? Cheers, Antoine - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 3:46 PM Subject: cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs JavaTest.java > antoine 2003/08/28

Re: [GUMP] Test Failure - Ant

This failure (PermissionsTest) is already fixed in CVS (checked with Stefan Bodewig). Antoine - Original Message - From: "Gump Integration Build" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 3:25 PM Subject: [GUMP] Test Failure - Ant > > [junit] Testsui

Re: [VOTE] Adding Permissions / Security Manager to Java task and JUnit task

Hi Stefan, does gump start ant builds in a new VM ? Can it be that the security manager which gump is using is preventing these permissions from being granted in ant ? I am not an expert about permissions, but I do not think that the locale would explain these problems ? Antoine - Original Mes

Request

when build.properties contains j2ee.home=J:/J2EE/j2ee_sdk_win ant builds correctly When build.properties contains j2ee.home=J:\J2EE\j2ee_sdk_win ant doesnt build because it cannot resolve JAVA_HOME PLEASE make the forward and back slashes interchangeable -Martin - Original Message - Fro

cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs JavaTest.java

antoine 2003/08/28 06:46:33 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks java.html src/etc/testcases/taskdefs java.xml src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Java.java src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs JavaTest.java Log: Set default permission

[GUMP] Test Failure - Ant

030828/js.jar:/home/rubys/jakarta/beanshell/dist/bsh-20030828.jar:/home/rubys/jakarta/beanshell/dist/bsh-bsf-20030828.jar:/home/rubys/jakarta/beanshell/dist/bsh-classpath-20030828.jar:/home/rubys/jakarta/beanshell/dist/bsh-commands-20030828.jar:/home/rubys/jakarta/beanshell/dist/bsh-core-200308

cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/types PermissionsTest.java

antoine 2003/08/28 05:24:31 Modified:src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/types PermissionsTest.java Log: Make the tests pass under Gump Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +7 -1 ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/types/PermissionsTest.java

Re: [VOTE] Adding Permissions / Security Manager to Java task and JUnit task

On 28 Aug 2003, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > While you are at it, PermissionsTest fails in Gump for me. the gory details (it doesn't fail if I run it interactively, my locale settings are different when using Gump which runs via cron, I don't see any other difference at first glanc

Re: [VOTE] Adding Permissions / Security Manager to Java task and JUnit task

On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > JavaTest fails under IDEA with the new CVS HEAD. I need to have a > look to see what is happening. While you are at it, PermissionsTest fails in Gump for me. Stefan --

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22782] - MalformedURLException: unknown protocol

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22783] - MalformedURLException: unknown protocol

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19237] - SSHExec task should fail if remote command fails

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/ssh SSHExec.java

bodewig 2003/08/28 00:10:40 Modified:docs/manual/OptionalTasks scp.html sshexec.html src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/ssh SSHExec.java Log: Make evaluate the exit code of the remote command. PR: 19237 Based on a submission

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22783] New: - MalformedURLException: unknown protocol

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22782] New: - MalformedURLException: unknown protocol

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [Bug 19237] - SSHExec task should fail if remote command fails

On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Robert H. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jsch-0.1.7 is out. I know (I'm a bit timezone challenged ;-), will look into your patch soon. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additiona

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22757] - Ant documentation not available

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu