Re: [DISCUSSION] Airflow 2 DAGs compatible with Airflow 3

2025-04-01 Thread Tamara Fingerlin
Hi Eugen As others have said from airflow.operators.python_operator import PythonOperator has been deprecated a long time ago and wont work anymore in Airflow 3. from airflow.operators.python import PythonOperator which was the preferred import for recent years is going to get deprecated

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 3.0.0 from 3.0.0rc4 & Task SDK 1.0.0 from 1.0.0rc4

2025-04-22 Thread Tamara Fingerlin
+1 (non-binding). Ran my sample and demo dags. Thank you all so much for the huge effort and amazing work on this release! <3 On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 11:15 AM utkarsh sharma wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks, > Utkarsh > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 2:35 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > > +1. Bindin

[LAZY CONSENSUS] Changing catchup_by_default from True to False

2025-03-09 Thread Tamara Fingerlin
Hey :) Following the discussion in this thread I'd like to call for a LAZY CONSENSUS on changing the default of the Airflow config [scheduler] catchup_by_default from True to False. (#47354

Re: [DISCUSSION] Changing catchup_by_default from True to False

2025-03-06 Thread Tamara Fingerlin
Thank you all! Yes, it is starting to look like a lazy consensus candidate. :) Unless there are any objections today or tomorrow, I'll start that on Saturday (so Monday is in the window). And sorry about the initial confusion I should have specified that I am only talking about a config default ch

[DISCUSSION] Changing catchup_by_default from True to False

2025-03-05 Thread Tamara Fingerlin
Hey there, long time reader, first time poster here :) *tl;dr:* *As part of the 3.0 release, I would like to propose changing the default for `catchup_by_default` from True to False. * *This discussion asks for input and whether this can be a lazy consensus or should be a vote.* Timethings are

Re: Re: [VOTE] AIP-90 Human in the loop

2025-06-05 Thread Tamara Fingerlin
+1 non-binding. Very excited about this! On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 11:37 AM 邱冠銘 wrote: > +1 for non-binding. I think HITL makes sense to me since it’s a common > word used in many place like > https://cloud.google.com/discover/human-in-the-loop. But “manual” > proposed by Shahar is also a good choi

Re: [VOTE] Internationalization (i18n) policy

2025-06-05 Thread Tamara Fingerlin
+1 non-binding On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 12:33 PM Buğra Öztürk wrote: > +1 binding > > On Thu, 5 Jun 2025, 08:26 Amogh Desai, wrote: > > > +1 binding - well thought out document. > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > Amogh Desai > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 2:04 AM Ahmad Farhan > > wrote: > > >

Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Adding @TJaniF @m1racoli as Non-Committer Translation Owners

2025-06-16 Thread Tamara Fingerlin
Thank you! 😊 On Sat, Jun 14, 2025 at 11:17 AM Shahar Epstein wrote: > Welcome aboard :) > Don't forget to modify the CODEOWNERS to mention their up-to-date roles. > > On Sat, Jun 14, 2025 at 1:19 AM Jens Scheffler > > wrote: > > > Lazy consensus reached. Merging. Welcome @TJaniF + @m1racoli ! >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Amogh Desai

2025-06-27 Thread Tamara Fingerlin
Big congrats Amogh!! So well deserved :) On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 9:17 AM Amogh Desai wrote: > Thank you from the bottom of my heart to everyone! > > I am truly honoured to be appointed as a PMC member. This is a milestone I > have been > meaning to reach for the longest time! > > I have worked c