Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] New Provider for Apache TinkerPop (Gremlin)

2025-04-24 Thread Stephen Mallette
It's great to see this work make it to a merge state and looking forward to trying out the release version. Thanks! On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 7:16 AM Ahmad Farhan wrote: > Hello All, > > I am excited to announce this provider has been merged now as Version 1.0.0 > and should be published in the ne

testing TinkerPop provider - was: Airflow Providers prepared on May 05, 2025

2025-05-05 Thread Stephen Mallette
nternally runs > some "removed" airflow commands? Generally speaking, `breeze down` and > reinstall > should fix it, but I guess the command needs to be updated too. Please feel > free to > open a PR for updating that command. > > Thanks & Regards, > Amogh Desai

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on May 05, 2025

2025-05-05 Thread Stephen Mallette
I was trying out the contributor instructions for testing the release. I gravitated toward the instructions using Breeze: https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#installing-with-breeze and am getting an error. I assume there's just something wrong with my envir

Re: testing TinkerPop provider - was: Airflow Providers prepared on May 05, 2025

2025-05-05 Thread Stephen Mallette
from PyPI - you need to install it > (and you need to restart all the components in tmux) - alternatively add > startyup script to install it > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/breeze/doc/02_customizing.rst#customizing-breeze-startup > > On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 6:02

Re: [DISCUSS] New Provider for Gremlin

2025-03-06 Thread Stephen Mallette
emlin > >> provider. > >> While I like Gremlin better (it's just a cool name and I like the logo, > >> tinkerpop has a cool logo as well > https://tinkerpop.apache.org/index.html > >> ). > >> > >> So as long as we decide not to use comm

Re: [DISCUSS] New Provider for Gremlin

2025-02-26 Thread Stephen Mallette
On 2025/02/26 12:38:02 Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Yeah . `apache/gremlin" seems like a better option then. Does anyone have > anything against it? In the interest of ASF trademarks, I would suggest it be called "apache/tinkerpop" with "Gremlin" naming reserved for operators and the like, as it is

Re: [DISCUSS] New Provider for Gremlin

2025-02-26 Thread Stephen Mallette
kerPop, even before we brought it to the ASF so I'm pretty familiar with our project. :) [1] https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/blob/master/docs/static/images/tinkerpop3-splash.png [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/9hf4t8hyk944fyo4q3nygczyo5xhk18y > > > J. > > > On Wed, Feb 2

RE: Re: [DISCUSS] New Provider for Gremlin

2025-02-26 Thread Stephen Mallette
fascinating - i was just visiting the list to discuss this very topic having just got started building the very same provider. :) Ahmad, thanks for your work jere. It's about inline with what I was planning. A bit about me, I'm one of the earliest contributors to TinkerPop, a current committer an

Re: [DISCUSS] New Provider for Gremlin

2025-04-04 Thread Stephen Mallette
is ready for thorough > > review. I will create a `[LAZY CONSENSUS]` thread on Monday/Tuesday. > Feel > > free to review and comment on the PR in the meantime. > > > > Farhan > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2025 at 1:40 PM Stephen Mallette > > wrote: > > &