Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.3.4 from 2.3.4rc1

2022-08-20 Thread Jorrick Sleijster
+1 (non-binding). Verified this release (due to #25296) will enable us to deploy Airflow with our plugin again :) Op za 20 aug. 2022 om 16:30 schreef Ash Berlin-Taylor : > +1 (binding) > > On 20 August 2022 15:25:24 BST, Jarek Potiuk wrote: >> >> +1 (binding). >> >> Tested all my changes, run a

Re: Seeking Feedback for Airflow Multi-Tenant Model Proposal

2023-01-10 Thread Jorrick Sleijster
HI Shubham, Nice elaborate document. Thanks for sharing. I tried my best to provide some feedback and insights on how we are currently using Airflow at Adyen. Note: I hope you didn't get an email for each of my comments, as I deleted most of them given they were answered later on in the document

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Brent Bovenzi

2023-03-15 Thread Jorrick Sleijster
Congratulatuons Brent! It had always been a pleasure to work with you 😁 On Wed, 15 Mar 2023, 11:36 Igor Kholopov, wrote: > Congrats, Brent! > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 10:47 AM Kaxil Naik wrote: > > > Congrats Brent > > > > On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 at 08:18, Hussein Awala wrote: > > > > > Congratul

Re: [VOTE] March PR of the Month

2023-03-30 Thread Jorrick Sleijster
Some great PRs. My vote goes to #29413 though. Can't wait to test this out :) Op do 30 mrt 2023 om 17:18 schreef John Thomas : > Hey folks, > > I'm pushing the close for this back to Saturday 4/1 at 9a MT > I'd love to get some more opinions in before the end of the week :) > > - J > > On Tue, M

Re: [VOTE] April 2023 PR of the Month

2023-04-26 Thread Jorrick Sleijster
+1 for #30373. Can't wait to test it 😁 On Wed, 26 Apr 2023, 08:12 Pankaj Koti, wrote: > +1 for #30373 by @bbovenzi: “Improve task & run actions UX in grid view” < > https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/30373> > > Regards, > > > > Pankaj Koti > > *Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team

Re: [VOTE] December PR of the Month

2024-01-02 Thread Jorrick Sleijster
While we have many good contenders this month. With 35719 and especially 36472 being on my watchlist, 35926 is something I've been looking forward to. Thanks for putting 35926 on the radar Jarek. On Tue, 2 Jan 2024, 23:05 Jarek Potiuk, wrote: > I'd like to propose another one: > https://github.

Re: [VOTE] AIP-67 - Multi-team deplyment of Airflow Components

2024-08-04 Thread Jorrick Sleijster
+1 non-binding. We have always believed that a single airflow makes it easier for our users. Unfortunately that leaves much to be desired on isolation perspective. For that reason our most requested functionality remains; 'can I get a Variable or Connection only accessible to my team?'. Our users,

Re: New PMC Member: Jed Cunningham

2022-01-05 Thread Jorrick Sleijster
Congratulations Jed! Great news and well deserved 🎊👌 On Wed, 5 Jan 2022, 10:32 Tomasz Urbaszek, wrote: > Congratulations Jed! > > > On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 at 03:37, Ian Stanton > wrote: > >> Congrats Jed! >> >> On Tue, Jan 4, 2022, 4:01 PM Dennis Akpenyi >> wrote: >> >>> Congratulations Jed! Well

Re: Auditability and eventing on administrative modifications

2022-03-19 Thread Jorrick Sleijster
Hi Chris, We had the same wish around a bit more than a year ago and approached it from a different angle. We created SQLAlchemy listeners on the Airflow models for connections and variables (kinda hacky right?). This meant that we were able to send notifications about who modified something and w

Re: Auditability and eventing on administrative modifications

2022-03-31 Thread Jorrick Sleijster
this point. If you have any trouble or questions, please let me know and I'll see what I can do to help you out. Op wo 30 mrt. 2022 om 16:07 schreef ch...@replicon.com.INVALID : > Hi Jorrick Sleijster, if the offer still stands I wouldn't mind seeing any > code snippets you could sha