Great work. This is something that no one wanted to do -- thanks for
digging in here and making such a huge impact!
On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 7:49 AM Vincent Beck wrote:
> That is awesome!!! Huge huge improvement!
>
> On 2025/05/09 19:56:58 Vikram Koka wrote:
> > Great job Pavan and team!
> > 3 mi
Great, Thank you kaxil :)
Regards,
Pavan
On Wed, May 14, 2025, 16:12 Kaxil Naik wrote:
> Hi team,
>
> Airflow 3.0+ uses Task Execution API, which uses Cadywn for versioning. To
> ensure backwards compatibility is maintained between different Airflow
> versioning with regards to this Execution A
Hi team,
Airflow 3.0+ uses Task Execution API, which uses Cadywn for versioning. To
ensure backwards compatibility is maintained between different Airflow
versioning with regards to this Execution API, please refer to
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/contributing-docs/19_execution_api_v
Hey all,
I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is
calling a vote on the release,
which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on May 17, 2025
12:10 PM UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been received.
Consider this my (binding) +1.
Airflow Provider
Thank you Kaxil.
It is helpful for contributors to understand things too and for prevent
committers
from accidentally merging such PRs as we work on a precommit / CI test that
can avoid this trouble.
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 10:35 AM Pavankumar Gopidesu <
gopidesupa
+1 non binding.
Tested my changes and ran a couple of other DAGs from my test suite.
- Use Label class from task sdk in providers #49398 (dbt)
- Use Label class from task sdk in providers #49398 (microsoft)
- Flattening the requirements input for python venv operators #50521 for a
CI fix
- Adding
Thank You, Kaxil and Amogh.
Regards,
Rahul Vats
On Thu, 15 May 2025 at 12:09, Amogh Desai wrote:
> Thank you Kaxil.
>
> It is helpful for contributors to understand things too and for prevent
> committers
> from accidentally merging such PRs as we work on a precommit / CI test that
> can avoid