Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on April 24, 2025

2025-04-25 Thread Kaxil Naik
+1 binding On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 at 15:41, Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote: > +1 binding > > > On 25 Apr 2025, at 06:23, Amogh Desai wrote: > > > > +1 non binding > > > > Tested my changes, works fine: > > #49492 doc only change > > #49500

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on April 24, 2025

2025-04-25 Thread Vishnu Chilukoori
+1 non binding -- Regards, Vishnu Chilukoori On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 6:59 AM Vincent Beck wrote: > +1 non binding. I tested the FAB provider fix ( > https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/49724) and it works fine. > > On 2025/04/25 13:18:17 Kaxil Naik wrote: > > +1 binding > > > > On Fri, 25 A

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on April 24, 2025

2025-04-25 Thread Vincent Beck
+1 non binding. I tested the FAB provider fix (https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/49724) and it works fine. On 2025/04/25 13:18:17 Kaxil Naik wrote: > +1 binding > > On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 at 15:41, Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote: > > > +1 binding > > > > > On 25 Apr 2025, at 06:23, Amogh Desai wro

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on April 24, 2025

2025-04-25 Thread Buğra Öztürk
+1 non-binding On Fri, 25 Apr 2025, 16:39 Vishnu Chilukoori, wrote: > +1 non binding > > > -- > Regards, > Vishnu Chilukoori > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 6:59 AM Vincent Beck wrote: > > > +1 non binding. I tested the FAB provider fix ( > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/49724) and it wor

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on April 24, 2025

2025-04-25 Thread Aritra Basu
+1 (non binding) -- Regards, Aritra Basu On Fri, 25 Apr 2025, 8:23 pm Buğra Öztürk, wrote: > +1 non-binding > > On Fri, 25 Apr 2025, 16:39 Vishnu Chilukoori, > wrote: > > > +1 non binding > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Vishnu Chilukoori > > > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 6:59 AM Vincent Beck > w

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on April 24, 2025

2025-04-25 Thread Ash Berlin-Taylor
+1 binding > On 25 Apr 2025, at 06:23, Amogh Desai wrote: > > +1 non binding > > Tested my changes, works fine: > #49492 doc only change > #49500 is a move from core > => standard and I checked from do