Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on April 16, 2025

2025-04-18 Thread Pavankumar Gopidesu
+1 non-binding. Verified my changes related to the standard provider all look good. Pavan On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 12:59 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > +1 binding - checked reproducibility (FYI - due to later renaming of the > provider you need to remove generated/provider_dependencies.json manually

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on April 16, 2025

2025-04-18 Thread Pavankumar Gopidesu
Also verified XcomBackend changes looks good. Regards, Pavan On Fri, Apr 18, 2025, 14:20 Pavankumar Gopidesu wrote: > +1 non-binding. > > Verified my changes related to the standard provider all look good. > > Pavan > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 12:59 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > >> +1 binding - che

Re: [DISCUSSION] Proposal to Add Couchbase Provider to Apache Airflow

2025-04-18 Thread Jarek Potiuk
> 1. Visibility is one of the motivations, but not the only one. Our main goal is to ensure a better experience for users who are already using Couchbase with Airflow, and to support future users with a provider that is more easily discoverable, better integrated with Airflow’s ecosystem, and al

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on April 16, 2025

2025-04-18 Thread Jarek Potiuk
+1 binding - checked reproducibility (FYI - due to later renaming of the provider you need to remove generated/provider_dependencies.json manually when you run it, but this is a one-time issue only), signatures, checksums. licences, my changes - all look good. On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 9:53 PM Vishn

Marking issues & PRs for Airflow >3.0.0

2025-04-18 Thread Kaxil Naik
Hey team, We now have milestones for 3.0.1, 3.1.0 and 3.1+. https://github.com/apache/airflow/milestone/111 https://github.com/apache/airflow/milestone/112 https://github.com/apache/airflow/milestone/106 Please add PRs & Issues with respective milestones to set expectations with the release mana

Re: [DISCUSS] When a DAG is paused, change the dag run state from running to failed.

2025-04-18 Thread Pedro Nunes Leal
A 2025-04-03 19:28, Brent Bovenzi escreveu: The issue is that duration is based off of start and end dates. If there is no end date we usually default to now. But that is misleading when a dag run is running but the dag is paused. Let me take a look at where we use duration in the 3.0 UI and se