Any response for this?
BKP
Brian Proffitt
VP, Marketing & Publicity
VP, Conferences
-- Forwarded message -
From: Brian Proffitt
Date: Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 5:46 PM
Subject: Re: Analyst questions regarding Apache Airflow
To: Thierry Carrez , Allison Price <
alli...@openinfra.dev
common.messaging and fab are excluded from this vote
On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 9:22 AM Amogh Desai wrote:
> +1 non binding.
>
> Tested my changes which primarily lied in these buckets:
>
> CI / static check fixes:
> - https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/48671
> - https://github.com/apache/airflo
Hey Brian,
I believe the devlist has not been copied in your previous email which was
apparently addressed to us (see the to: list there) - I could not find it
in the devlist in the past as well
https://lists.apache.org/list?dev@airflow.apache.org:lte=1M:Analyst%20questions%20regarding%20Apache%20
Brian,
Adding to Jarek's response above, I am happy to engage with them and help
answer the questions.
Please let me know.
Vikram
On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 6:43 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> Hey Brian,
>
> I believe the devlist has not been copied in your previous email which was
> apparently address
Great work, all.
> Yay! FABulous milestone!
I believe you mean FAB-u-less? :P
- ferruzzi
From: Abhishek Bhakat
Sent: Monday, April 7, 2025 10:54 PM
To: dev@airflow.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EXT] Au revoir Flask
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of
+1 - binding - checked reproducibility (fab does not pass it), signatures,
checksums, licences, checked all my changes - except fab size and
reproducibility all is good.
On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 8:52 AM Elad Kalif wrote:
> common.messaging and fab are excluded from this vote
>
> On Mon, Apr 7, 202
