Yeah. That's the best course of action, I think ...
On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 6:55 PM Beck, Vincent
wrote:
> Hi Airflow devs,
>
> I am calling a LAZY CONSENSUS to create a new major version of the fab
> provider that will only be compatible with Airflow 3. The reason why we
> need it is we are plan
Hi everyone,
Here is a quick reminder that we have our Airflow 3 dev call at Thursday,
7th November 2024 at 8AM PST (11 am EST | 5 pm UTC / GMT).
Proposed agenda:
1. Check in on action items from the last call
- Update on what's left for AIP-79 (Ephraim, Vincent, Jed, Jens, et al)
- Upgrade notes
Hello guys,
First of all, thank you all for taking your time and giving your opinions and
insights regarding my proposal. I also think it would indeed be better to do
an official AIP proposal. I just planted the seed here to see how this
proposal would be received. I will try to do this as s
Hi Airflow devs,
I am calling a LAZY CONSENSUS to create a new major version of the fab provider
that will only be compatible with Airflow 3. The reason why we need it is we
are planning to make some breaking changes in the fab provider that will be
incompatible with Airflow 2.X. Here are some
Hey All,
Here are the minutes, recording, and deck from our November 2024 Airflow
Town Hall! <
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zA7GoNrgzruWSloJJXdUeuiVZfgPIV5yXG0h82-Yfdc/edit?usp=sharing
>
I'm grateful to Constance Martineau, Vincent Beck, Nelson Alfonso,
and Péter Szécsi for presenting- tha
