Hey everyone,
We are currently implementing some breaking changes to the main branch.
I've created this issue to keep track of the items that need to be included
in our migration tool from version 2 to 3. I've provided two examples and
will add more in the upcoming days. It would be great if we co
To me I think if we have a trigger rule of run always, then a rule of run never
isn't so unreasonable.
Also regarding just adding the code snippet inline in the docs, rather than
importing from the DAG: The nice thing about having it come from the system
test DAG is that the code snippet stays
+1 binding
> On 21 Aug 2024, at 05:44, Rahul Vats wrote:
>
> +1 non-binding. Verified below providers with our example DAGS
>
> 1. https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-pgvector/1.3.0rc1/
> 2. https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-pinecone/2.1.0rc1/
> 3. https://py
Agree with Elad's take on this. I'd say no "large" features, but leaving some
wiggle room for changes that allow an easier segue to Airflow 3 would be great.
From: Amogh Desai
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2024 8:53:21 PM
To: dev@airflow.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EXT]
>
>
> Also regarding just adding the code snippet inline in the docs, rather
> than importing from the DAG: The nice thing about having it come from the
> system test DAG is that the code snippet stays up to date. Even if the task
> is being skipped, at least linters, static analysis, or failures d
I don't feel too strongly about this one (I suppose I also lean allow) but I
agree with removing as many of these configs as possible! So I'm all for this
one, either way.
From: Daniel Standish
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2024 6:13:31 PM
To: dev@airflow.apache.or
+1 (binding) checked signatures, checksums, licences, and sources.
On Wednesday, August 21, 2024, Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> > On 21 Aug 2024, at 05:44, Rahul Vats wrote:
> >
> > +1 non-binding. Verified below providers with our example DAGS
> >
> > 1. https://pypi.org/project/
> +0.5 for essential/s - it gives me a sense that it is mandatory
The essential/core/whatever-we-call-this will be an Airflow dependency and
installed any time you install Airflow so that's pretty accurate.
- ferruzzi
From: Amogh Desai
Sent: Tuesday, August 2
weak allow as well.
On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 8:31 PM Oliveira, Niko
wrote:
> I don't feel too strongly about this one (I suppose I also lean allow) but
> I agree with removing as many of these configs as possible! So I'm all for
> this one, either way.
>
>
> From:
