Airflow debugging story survey

Hello everyone, In the context of improving the Airflow debugging experience improving the Airflow debugging experience , a survey is being created to identify potential areas of improvement. Currently, this effort is taking place in this shared docu

Re: [VOTE] AIP-80: Explicit Template Fields in Operator Arguments

The topic here are TWO compatibility layers in this message: https://lists.apache.org/thread/4s58ho5cw1537sl9ql20n3xslxkjrhyy The first one is the path described in the AIP, which I consider the main way most people would migrate. The second one is what I consider would encourage users to not ch

[RESULT][VOTE] AIP-76: Asset Partitions

Hi all, The vote for AIP-76 has passed. AIP-76 Asset Partitions https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/2QyTEg Discussion thread https://lists.apache.org/thread/3d80921801j6p23x3xgq6yy09gy8yvm4 Vote thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread/g2c83wsrx1fy04v7kjzh65smykpf6c26 Binding +1: - TP Chung -

Re: [VOTE] AIP-80: Explicit Template Fields in Operator Arguments

Yes, there are two options. One - forward compatibility layer, and two - backwards compatibility layer. I strongly believe that if we care for Airflow 3 adoption, providing forward compatibility layers only is not enough, and lack of backwards compatibility layer in case of changes that bring mostl

Re: [VOTE] AIP-80: Explicit Template Fields in Operator Arguments

How can i remove myself from these emails? i want to follow airflow project technically but not interested on ongoing people-project management thingies. Thanks 🙏😊 Best Regards, Emanuel Oliveira On Thu 8 Aug 2024, 10:50 Michał Modras, wrote: > Yes, there are two options. One - forward compatibil

Re: [VOTE] AIP-80: Explicit Template Fields in Operator Arguments

@Emanuel You can send an email to dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org On Thu, 8 Aug 2024 at 10:59, Emanuel Oliveira wrote: > How can i remove myself from these emails? i want to follow airflow project > technically but not interested on ongoing people-project management > thingies. > Thanks 🙏😊 >

Re: Airflow debugging story survey

One option might be to create a Google Form so that people can leave responses easily and you can share the editor rights to PMC members so we can look at the responses too. What do you think? On Thu, 8 Aug 2024 at 08:45, Dev iL wrote: > Hello everyone, > > In the context of improving the Airfl

Re: [VOTE] AIP-67 - Multi-team deplyment of Airflow Components

+1 (binding) A lot of effort went into this one, great job Jarek. I'm happy to see this one get across the line because we hear from so many users and customers who want this feature. It's important to focus on building what users are asking for. From: Shahar Ep

Re: [VOTE] AIP-67 - Multi-team deplyment of Airflow Components

+1 binding On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 5:38 PM Oliveira, Niko wrote: > +1 (binding) > > A lot of effort went into this one, great job Jarek. I'm happy to see this > one get across the line because we hear from so many users and customers > who want this feature. It's important to focus on building wh

Re: [VOTE] AIP-67 - Multi-team deplyment of Airflow Components

+1 (non-binding) Regards, Pavan On Thu, Aug 8, 2024, 16:38 Oliveira, Niko wrote: > +1 (binding) > > A lot of effort went into this one, great job Jarek. I'm happy to see this > one get across the line because we hear from so many users and customers > who want this feature. It's important to fo

Tracking breaking changes for Airflow 3

Hello everyone, We ran out of time during the dev call today to discuss this (in any depth at least), and also for the benefit of those that were unable to attend: With the main branch opening up to breaking changes for Airflow 3 being right around the corner, I just want to remind contributors a

Re: Tracking breaking changes for Airflow 3

Please try to have at least 2 approvals for each breaking change (when possible provide sufficient time for others to review as well). בתאריך יום ה׳, 8 באוג׳ 2024, 20:57, מאת Jed Cunningham ‏< jedcunning...@apache.org>: > Hello everyone, > > We ran out of time during the dev call today to discuss

[VOTE] AIP-81 Enhanced Security in CLI via Integration of API

Hey all, I would like to call for a vote on AIP-81 Enhanced Security in CLI via Integration of API. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/4wvOEg I would like to thank everyone for providing valuable feedback to shape this AIP to its current state. This proposal aims to integrate the Apache Airflo

Re: [VOTE] AIP-81 Enhanced Security in CLI via Integration of API

+1 non-binding On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 2:29 PM Buğra Öztürk wrote: > Hey all, > > I would like to call for a vote on AIP-81 Enhanced Security in CLI via > Integration of API. > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/4wvOEg > > I would like to thank everyone for providing valuable feedback to shape