RE: Re: [DISCUSS] Consistent test assertion style: pytest-native vs unittest-style

2025-07-11 Thread Iliya Romm
Yes, `call` is supported, alongside other names from `unittest.mock`. In some cases, like with `spy`, they not only mirror but also extend the existing functionality. Ref: https://pytest-mock.readthedocs.io/en/latest/usage.html On 2025/07/10 14:47:30 Tzu-ping Chung wrote: > Does pytest-mock have a

RE: Re: [DISCUSS] Consistent test assertion style: pytest-native vs unittest-style

2025-07-10 Thread Dev-iL
One tiny comment regarding TP's suggestion - IMHO it's better to avoid `unittest.mock` in favor of the equivalent `mocker` fixture provided by `pytest-mock`. On 2025/07/10 06:30:22 Tzu-ping Chung wrote: > Personally I dislike things like assert_called_once_with etc. since they are easy to miss