Re: Proposal: SIG-Kubernetes

2020-03-06 Thread Xinbin Huang
+1 thanks for organizing this! On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 9:03 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Great time :) > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 6:01 PM Daniel Imberman > wrote: > > > Hello everyone! > > > > Let’s have our first SIG-Kubernetes meeting on Wednesday, March 18th at > > 11AM EST. I think it would be g

Re: Proposal: SIG-Kubernetes

2020-03-06 Thread Jarek Potiuk
Great time :) On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 6:01 PM Daniel Imberman wrote: > Hello everyone! > > Let’s have our first SIG-Kubernetes meeting on Wednesday, March 18th at > 11AM EST. I think it would be great to start with updates on the > airflow-on-k8s-operator, the helm chart, and the official docker

Re: Proposal: SIG-Kubernetes

2020-03-06 Thread Daniel Imberman
Hello everyone! Let’s have our first SIG-Kubernetes meeting on Wednesday, March 18th at 11AM EST. I think it would be great to start with updates on the airflow-on-k8s-operator, the helm chart, and the official docker image creation effort. Please let me know if this works (I will try to accom

Re: Proposal: SIG-Kubernetes

2020-03-02 Thread Tomasz Urbaszek
Hi all, The #sig-kubernetes is live on Airflow slack. I've also updated the Slack link in the airflow k8s operator. Some people on Kubernetes slack were wondering if the project is dead or not :) T. On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 11:54 AM Roi Teveth wrote: > > +1 would love to be a part of this > > >

Re: Proposal: SIG-Kubernetes

2020-02-29 Thread Roi Teveth
+1 would love to be a part of this On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 10:49 PM Kaxil Naik wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 8:40 PM Daniel Imberman > > wrote: > > > I’m glad to see that there is interest in this! > > > > For a scheduled meeting time would something similar to the > > SIG-autoscalin

Re: Proposal: SIG-Kubernetes

2020-02-26 Thread Kaxil Naik
+1 On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 8:40 PM Daniel Imberman wrote: > I’m glad to see that there is interest in this! > > For a scheduled meeting time would something similar to the > SIG-autoscaling work? > > Perhaps the second Wednesday of the month at 8AM or 9AM PST? > > @tomek I think that is an inter

Re: Proposal: SIG-Kubernetes

2020-02-26 Thread Daniel Imberman
I’m glad to see that there is interest in this! For a scheduled meeting time would something similar to the SIG-autoscaling work? Perhaps the second Wednesday of the month at 8AM or 9AM PST? @tomek I think that is an interesting point that we can discuss further in the slack group. Now that KE

Re: Proposal: SIG-Kubernetes

2020-02-26 Thread Adam Boscarino
+1 would love to be a part of this On Wed, Feb 26, 2020, 2:34 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 8:32 PM Daniel Stevenson wrote: > > > +1 great idea > > > > > > > On Feb 26, 2020, at 20:30, Kevin Yang wrote: > > > > > > +1 would love to join. > > > > > >> On Wed, Feb 26, 2

Re: Proposal: SIG-Kubernetes

2020-02-26 Thread Jarek Potiuk
+1 On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 8:32 PM Daniel Stevenson wrote: > +1 great idea > > > > On Feb 26, 2020, at 20:30, Kevin Yang wrote: > > > > +1 would love to join. > > > >> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 10:58 AM Xinbin Huang > wrote: > >> > >> +1 would love to join. > >> > >> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 10:2

Re: Proposal: SIG-Kubernetes

2020-02-26 Thread Daniel Stevenson
+1 great idea > On Feb 26, 2020, at 20:30, Kevin Yang wrote: > > +1 would love to join. > >> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 10:58 AM Xinbin Huang wrote: >> >> +1 would love to join. >> >> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 10:24 AM Dan Davydov >> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 would love to listen in on these >>> >>

Re: Proposal: SIG-Kubernetes

2020-02-26 Thread Kevin Yang
+1 would love to join. On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 10:58 AM Xinbin Huang wrote: > +1 would love to join. > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 10:24 AM Dan Davydov > > wrote: > > > +1 would love to listen in on these > > > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 11:52 AM Tomasz Urbaszek < > > tomasz.urbas...@polidea.com>

Re: Proposal: SIG-Kubernetes

2020-02-26 Thread Xinbin Huang
+1 would love to join. On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 10:24 AM Dan Davydov wrote: > +1 would love to listen in on these > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 11:52 AM Tomasz Urbaszek < > tomasz.urbas...@polidea.com> wrote: > > > +1 for the idea. Should Airflow k8s operator be included in those > > discussions? >

Re: Proposal: SIG-Kubernetes

2020-02-26 Thread Dan Davydov
+1 would love to listen in on these On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 11:52 AM Tomasz Urbaszek < tomasz.urbas...@polidea.com> wrote: > +1 for the idea. Should Airflow k8s operator be included in those > discussions? > > Also, I'm not sure if we have any more need to have autoscaling-only SIG? > Should we r

Re: Proposal: SIG-Kubernetes

2020-02-26 Thread Tomasz Urbaszek
+1 for the idea. Should Airflow k8s operator be included in those discussions? Also, I'm not sure if we have any more need to have autoscaling-only SIG? Should we rename the existing one? T. On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 4:43 PM Daniel Imberman wrote: > Hello Airflowers! > Recently we've had some pr

Proposal: SIG-Kubernetes

2020-02-26 Thread Daniel Imberman
Hello Airflowers! Recently we've had some pretty great success with the SIG-Autoscaling and SIG-DAG-Serialization groups. In this same vein, I'd like to propose a SIG-Kubernetes group where we can discuss all efforts to improve the airflow Kubernetes story. We would meet once a month and discus