Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on February 12, 2024

Hi, I want to change my vote on Amazon to +1. The issue I mentioned is no longer reproducible. Thanks! Best, Wei > On Feb 15, 2024, at 1:19 AM, Pankaj Singh wrote: > > - 1 (non-binding) for cncf.kubernetes and common.sql since bug has been > reported. > > I have raised a PR for the CNCF prov

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on February 12, 2024

- 1 (non-binding) for cncf.kubernetes and common.sql since bug has been reported. I have raised a PR for the CNCF provider at https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37363 to address the issues raised by @vchiapaikeo. The PR has been tested by @vchiapaikeo for his use case. +1 (non-binding) for ot

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on February 12, 2024

-1 (non-binding) only for cncf.kubernetes: 8.0.0rc1 and common.sql: 1.11.0rc2. 1. cncf.kubernetes: Pankaj Singh (@pankajastro) is actively working on resolving bugs reported in the resolution PR https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37363. He will update here and in the status of RC testing issue

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on February 12, 2024

*Update:* Providers amazon, cncf.kubernetes and common.sql will be excluded from RC1. On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 8:33 PM Vincent Beck wrote: > +1 non binding. All AWS system tests are working fine against 8.18.0rc1. > You can the results here: > https://aws-mwaa.github.io/#/open-source/system-tes

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on February 12, 2024

+1 non binding. All AWS system tests are working fine against 8.18.0rc1. You can the results here: https://aws-mwaa.github.io/#/open-source/system-tests/version/2e1561015c44a0acfd86b63360fc17ad477a8d3b_8.18.0rc1.html On 2024/02/13 05:08:17 Wei Lee wrote: > -1 (non-binding) for amazon: 8.18.0rc1,

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on February 12, 2024

-1 (non-binding) for amazon: 8.18.0rc1, cncf.kubernetes: 8.0.0rc1, common.sql: 1.11.0rc2. * Amazon: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36685 doesn’t work as expected in the RC. It holds the DAG in the deferred state forever. * Kubernetes: issue mentioned in https://github.com/apache/airflow/

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on February 12, 2024

- 0 (non binding) due to https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37279 for the CNCF provider +1 (non binding) for the rest On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 5:34 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > +1 (binding), checked signatures, checksums, licences, reproducibility. > Checked all my changes are present in the pac

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on February 12, 2024

+1 (binding), checked signatures, checksums, licences, reproducibility. Checked all my changes are present in the packages. -1 (common.sql missing more-itertools dependency - already merged in main). On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 9:13 PM Hussein Awala wrote: > I checked the source code, the licences,

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on February 12, 2024

I checked the source code, the licences, the signatures, and the checksums and tested my changes; all look good. -0 (binding) for cncf.kubernetes provider; #37279 is too risky and needs some testing, I will try to find some time to test all the cases

[VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on February 12, 2024

Hey all, I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is calling a vote on the release, which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on February 15, 2024 11:30 AM UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been received. Consider this my (binding) +1. Airflow Pr