Dr. Markus
> > > Forschner,
> > > Stefan Grosch, Dr. Markus Heyn, Dr. Frank Meyer, Dr. Tanja Rückert
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Oliveira, Niko
> > > Sent: Thursday, July 11,
er: Prof. Dr. Stefan Asenkerschbaumer;
> > Geschäftsführung: Dr. Stefan Hartung, Dr. Christian Fischer, Dr. Markus
> > Forschner,
> > Stefan Grosch, Dr. Markus Heyn, Dr. Frank Meyer, Dr. Tanja Rückert
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Oliveira, Niko
>
Dr. Stefan Hartung, Dr. Christian Fischer, Dr. Markus
> Forschner,
> Stefan Grosch, Dr. Markus Heyn, Dr. Frank Meyer, Dr. Tanja Rückert
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Oliveira, Niko
> Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2024 6:26 PM
> To: dev@airflow.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE
-
From: Oliveira, Niko
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2024 6:26 PM
To: dev@airflow.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] AIP-72: Task Execution Interface aka Task SDK
+1 binding
As Jarek mentioned, still some discussions ongoing but I think that can be
hashed out later. Looks good overall
+1 binding
As Jarek mentioned, still some discussions ongoing but I think that can be
hashed out later. Looks good overall.
From: Elad Kalif
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2024 9:11:19 AM
To: dev@airflow.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EXT] [VOTE] AIP-72: Task Execution
+1 binding
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 5:50 PM Bishundeo, Rajeshwar
wrote:
> +1 non-binding
>
> -- Rajesh
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 2024-07-11, 9:57 AM, "Vincent Beck" vincb...@apache.org>> wrote:
>
>
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
> click links or open attachment
+1 non-binding
-- Rajesh
On 2024-07-11, 9:57 AM, "Vincent Beck" mailto:vincb...@apache.org>> wrote:
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click
links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the
content is safe.
AVERTISSEMEN
+1 binding
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 6:58 AM Vincent Beck wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> On 2024/07/11 13:32:14 Igor Kholopov wrote:
> > +1, non-binding
> >
> > Some alignment with AIP-66 might be required, but the general vision
> > implementation looks clear to me.
> >
> > Thanks for leading this eff
+1 binding
On 2024/07/11 13:32:14 Igor Kholopov wrote:
> +1, non-binding
>
> Some alignment with AIP-66 might be required, but the general vision
> implementation looks clear to me.
>
> Thanks for leading this effort!
>
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 3:21 PM Jed Cunningham
> wrote:
>
> > +1 bindin
+1, non-binding
Some alignment with AIP-66 might be required, but the general vision
implementation looks clear to me.
Thanks for leading this effort!
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 3:21 PM Jed Cunningham
wrote:
> +1 binding
>
+1 binding
+1 binding
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 6:06 PM Buğra Öztürk
wrote:
> +1 non-binding
>
> On Thu, 11 Jul 2024, 14:21 Maciej Obuchowski,
> wrote:
>
> > +1 binding.
> >
> > czw., 11 lip 2024 o 14:15 Kaxil Naik napisał(a):
> >
> > > +1 binding
> > >
> > > On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 at 12:39, Jarek Potiuk wro
+1 non-binding
On Thu, 11 Jul 2024, 14:21 Maciej Obuchowski,
wrote:
> +1 binding.
>
> czw., 11 lip 2024 o 14:15 Kaxil Naik napisał(a):
>
> > +1 binding
> >
> > On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 at 12:39, Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> >
> > > I am +1 on it.
> > >
> > > While there are still open discussions on detai
+1 binding.
czw., 11 lip 2024 o 14:15 Kaxil Naik napisał(a):
> +1 binding
>
> On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 at 12:39, Jarek Potiuk wrote:
>
> > I am +1 on it.
> >
> > While there are still open discussions on details there, I think the
> > overall general direction is hashed out "good enough". Certainly
+1 binding
On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 at 12:39, Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> I am +1 on it.
>
> While there are still open discussions on details there, I think the
> overall general direction is hashed out "good enough". Certainly in
> the "what we want to achieve" and "what limitations it will bring" but
>
I am +1 on it.
While there are still open discussions on details there, I think the
overall general direction is hashed out "good enough". Certainly in
the "what we want to achieve" and "what limitations it will bring" but
also "what interaction it will have with other AIPs" and we do not
have to
I’m calling for a vote on this AIP
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-72+Task+Execution+Interface+aka+Task+SDK
Previous discussion thread was
https://lists.apache.org/thread/drfmwbx5brtycjkmtf51owrmhvmlx2lk
Based on the recent discussions I have added the section titled "Dag
17 matches
Mail list logo
