+1. Makes total sense to me
On 2025/03/14 06:38:29 Wei Lee wrote:
> +1 sounds like a good idea!
>
> Best,
> Wei
>
> > On Mar 14, 2025, at 1:47 PM, Amogh Desai wrote:
> >
> > Good idea, +1 for that idea to be able to decouple it out of core
> >
> > Thanks & Regards,
> > Amogh Desai
> >
> >
>
+1 sounds good. Any decoupling makes security patches and updates a lot
easier.
On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 1:51 PM Vincent Beck wrote:
> +1. Makes total sense to me
>
> On 2025/03/14 06:38:29 Wei Lee wrote:
> > +1 sounds like a good idea!
> >
> > Best,
> > Wei
> >
> > > On Mar 14, 2025, at 1:47 PM,
+1 sounds like a good idea!
Best,
Wei
> On Mar 14, 2025, at 1:47 PM, Amogh Desai wrote:
>
> Good idea, +1 for that idea to be able to decouple it out of core
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Amogh Desai
>
>
> On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 at 10:13 AM, Jed Cunningham
> wrote:
>
>> +1, better to have it in a p
Good idea, +1 for that idea to be able to decouple it out of core
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 at 10:13 AM, Jed Cunningham
wrote:
> +1, better to have it in a provider to set a good precedent for future
> bundles.
>
+1, better to have it in a provider to set a good precedent for future
bundles.
Ok. Thanks
On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 at 17:56, Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> More this:
>
> https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow-providers/core-extensions/index.html
> and
>
> https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow/stable/cli-and-env-variables-ref.html#executors
>
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 5
More this:
https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow-providers/core-extensions/index.html
and
https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow/stable/cli-and-env-variables-ref.html#executors
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 5:29 PM Ephraim Anierobi
wrote:
> It looks like it's already added in the draf
Great idea. We might want to add it also to more "provider info" stuff
(does not have to be this PR - likely when we create 2nd or 3rd bundle).
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 5:14 PM Ephraim Anierobi
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I would like to propose moving the Git DAG bundle to a new Git provider.
>
>
It looks like it's already added in the draft PR. Like in
"provider_info.schema.json". Is that what you mean?
On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 at 17:22, Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> Great idea. We might want to add it also to more "provider info" stuff
> (does not have to be this PR - likely when we create 2nd or 3
Hi everyone,
I would like to propose moving the Git DAG bundle to a new Git provider.
As part of AIP-66, we created a versioned Git DAG bundle(a new term) in the
dag_processing package with a plan to eventually move it into its own provider
package.
Looking at the possibility of having other
10 matches
Mail list logo
