Full votes:
+0.9 Distributed
+0.5 External
-0.5 Agent
-1 Remote
From: Scheffler Jens (XC-AS/EAE-ADA-T)
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2024 2:06:20 PM
To: dev@airflow.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EXT] [DISCUSS] Name for the Executor of AIP-69
CAUTION: This email origina
, August 28, 2024 2:06:20 PM
To: dev@airflow.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EXT] [DISCUSS] Name for the Executor of AIP-69
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click
links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the
content is safe.
AVERTISSEMENT
Ilile the additional ideas by Shubham, therefore I change my Voted a bit:
* +1 for Remote
* +0.9 for Edge - in my view this fits really very good (not the meaning
like edge case or the browser named edge) because also some infrastructure
providers call remote/sattelite data centers being
om
>„remote“/central site…
>
>Sent from Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef> <https://aka.ms/o0ukef>;>
>____________
>From: Jarek Potiuk mailto:ja...@potiuk.com>>
>Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2024 7:05:29 PM
>To: dev@airflow.apache.org <
just do what the scheduler instructs to do. Controlled from
>„remote“/central site…
>
>Sent from Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
>____
>From: Jarek Potiuk
>Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2024 7:05:29 PM
>To: dev@airflow.apache.org
>Su
__
> From: Jarek Potiuk mailto:ja...@potiuk.com>>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2024 7:05:29 PM
> To: dev@airflow.apache.org <mailto:dev@airflow.apache.org>
> mailto:dev@airflow.apache.org>>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Name for the Executor of AIP-69
>
scheduler instructs to do. Controlled from
„remote“/central site…
Sent from Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
From: Jarek Potiuk
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2024 7:05:29 PM
To: dev@airflow.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Name for the Executor of AIP-69
ag
nly in our docs but in our previous
> >>> summit talks, town halls, Github Issues/Discussions, Slack threads,
> etc.
> >>> It's a term we've used as a community for years. So we should not
> change
> >>> all that under the feet of our users just because
t;>> new name for AIP-69. I think distributed is good for this new feature, but
>>> I am also curious to see if anyone has other proposals.
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Vincent Beck
>>> Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2024 7:53:27 AM
&
the feet of our users just because it is difficult to find a
>> new name for AIP-69. I think distributed is good for this new feature, but
>> I am also curious to see if anyone has other proposals.
>>
>>
>> From: Vincent Beck
>>
t because it is difficult to find a
> new name for AIP-69. I think distributed is good for this new feature, but
> I am also curious to see if anyone has other proposals.
>
>
> From: Vincent Beck
> Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2024 7:53:27 AM
> To:
3:27 AM
To: dev@airflow.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EXT] [DISCUSS] Name for the Executor of AIP-69
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click
links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the
content is safe.
AVERTISSEMENT: Ce courrier électroniqu
Distributed makes more sense to me. +1 binding on this one. Remote executor is
too broad to me
On 2024/08/27 14:43:33 Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> I prefer distributed - as Remote executor is already a well-established
> term. But this is -0.5 on "remote" - if others think it's ok, I am fine.
>
> On Tu
I prefer distributed - as Remote executor is already a well-established
term. But this is -0.5 on "remote" - if others think it's ok, I am fine.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 3:33 PM Scheffler Jens (XC-AS/EAE-ADA-T)
wrote:
> Hi Airflow-Devs,
>
> AIP-69 has come as MVP to the front-door of the repo in
Hi Airflow-Devs,
AIP-69 has come as MVP to the front-door of the repo in form of 3 PRs. But as
in the Voting there has been a bit of discussion about how we call that "baby"
I'd like to have a wrap-up about the name and see what the majority is for.
The AIP-69 defined the implementation as "Rem
15 matches
Mail list logo
