OK. I see enough voices in the discussion to assume this is a good
direction, let me start a lazy consensus on that one and prepare a PR where
the simplifications will be more visible.
On Sun, Mar 23, 2025 at 11:16 AM Pierre Jeambrun
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Sun 23 Mar 2025 at 09:41, Elad Kalif wrote
+1
On Sun 23 Mar 2025 at 09:41, Elad Kalif wrote:
> +1
>
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2025 at 6:11 PM Shahar Epstein wrote:
>
> > +1 from me - uv is a great tool, improves developer experience, and it is
> > well-supported.
> > While acknowledging the licensing issues that you mentioned - if
> migration
>
+1
On Sat, Mar 22, 2025 at 6:11 PM Shahar Epstein wrote:
> +1 from me - uv is a great tool, improves developer experience, and it is
> well-supported.
> While acknowledging the licensing issues that you mentioned - if migration
> from the current dual license ever happens, I assume that we'll be
