Thanks Amogh,
Yes. The article is pretty good :).
But I think that "kudos" is more for the community - ASF members, and
various Foundation members I reached out to. IMHO what we saw in this case
was pretty unprecedented unity and understanding how important the problem
is and how dangerous it mig
Amazing effort! This community is where lightning-fast migrations happen!
Kudos all!
Thanks, Jarek for the tooling which made the migration much easier and
faster!
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 5:59 AM Amogh Desai
wrote:
> Kudos to the community!
>
> The entire work was completed in the brink of an e
Email lists are self-service, please see the instructions on the Community page
ere: https://airflow.apache.org/community/#:~:text=unsubscribe
- ferruzzi
From: Konstantinos Daniilidis
Sent: Friday, February 7, 2025 11:03 PM
To: dev@airflow.apache.org
Subject
+1 on that proposal, refreshing the code owners would be a great idea. That is
something that could help to reduce the number of stale PRs.
On 2025/02/09 07:17:56 Amogh Desai wrote:
> Love this idea!
>
> Yeah, I felt that CODEOWNERS file was a little bit outdated in the context
> of Airflow 3
>
Dear Airflow community,
I'm happy to announce that Airflow 2.10.5 was just released.
The released sources and packages can be downloaded via
https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow/2.10.5/installation/installing-from-sources.html
Other installation methods are described in
https://airflow
Hello,
Apache Airflow 2.10.5 (based on RC1) has been accepted.
4 "+1" binding votes received:
- Jens Scheffler
- Jarek Potiuk
- Ephraim Anierobi
- Elad Kalif
4 "+1" non-binding votes received:
- Amogh Desai
- Rahul Vats
- Vishnu Chilukoori
- Utkarsh Sharma
Vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org
+1 binding. tested example dags. looks good
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 11:06 AM Ephraim Anierobi
wrote:
> +1 binding. Checked reproducible builds, licences & checksums
>
> On Sun, 9 Feb 2025 at 20:59, Vishnu Chilukoori
> wrote:
>
> > +1 Non-binding checked Reproducible builds
> >
> > --
> > Regar
+1 binding. Checked reproducible builds, licences & checksums
On Sun, 9 Feb 2025 at 20:59, Vishnu Chilukoori
wrote:
> +1 Non-binding checked Reproducible builds
>
> --
> Regards,
> Vishnu Chilukoori
>
> On Sun, Feb 9, 2025 at 1:07 AM Rahul Vats wrote:
>
> > +1 non-binding, Tested with example