+1 (non-binding)
Tested against some test dags, don't see any regressions
--
Regards,
Aritra Basu
On Sat, Mar 9, 2024, 10:27 AM Amogh Desai wrote:
> +1 non binding.
> Installed and ran some example DAGs. All looks good.
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Amogh Desai
>
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 8:31 PM Vinc
+1 non binding.
Installed and ran some example DAGs. All looks good.
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 8:31 PM Vincent Beck wrote:
> +1 non binding. I check my change and it works as expected. I also ran few
> testing DAGs and they ran fine.
>
> On 2024/03/08 00:14:12 Jarek P
To Jarek's phrasing - I think it is mostly right. The way I think about it:
when deprecating we guarantee that for 6 months we will not do breaking
changes, but after that period, on an occasion of releasing a major
provider package version (which is probably breaking anyway) we can do
cleanup and
+1 non binding. I check my change and it works as expected. I also ran few
testing DAGs and they ran fine.
On 2024/03/08 00:14:12 Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> +1 (binding): checked reproducibility, sources, licences, checksums,
> run a few dags, tested all my changes, all looks good.
>
> One caveat. I
Dear community,
I'm happy to announce that new versions of Airflow Providers packages
prepared on March 04, 2024 were just released. Full list of PyPI packages
released is added at the end of the message.
The source release, as well as the binary releases, are available here:
https://airflow.apa
Hello,
Apache Airflow Providers prepared on February 23, 2024 have been accepted.
Provider cncf.kubernetes is excluded thus not counting votes casted on it.
3 "+1" binding votes received:
- Elad Kalif
- Jarek Potiuk
- Hussein Awala
4 "+1" non-binding votes received:
- Vincent beck
- Rahul Vats
