+1
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 2:13 PM Jamie G. wrote:
> +1
>
> Cheers,
> Jamie
>
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 5:58 PM Timothy Bish wrote:
> >
> > On 6/17/25 12:32, Jean-Baptist
t you know
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 6:33 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.7 to your vote.
>
> This is a maintenance release on the 6.1.x ser
Great, can you try to get the PR in regarding the resource adapter deadlock
issue?
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 5:37 PM Christopher Shannon <
christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey JB,
I think it's outdated anyways, so removing it with the upcoming 6.2 is fine
in my opinion.
Should we create a VOTE thread for it or I can go ahead and create a PR for
it?
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Thu, May 1, 2025 at 7:40 AM
t4IdeaTestRunner.startRunnerWithArgs(JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.java:69)
> at
> com.intellij.rt.junit.IdeaTestRunner$Repeater$1.execute(IdeaTestRunner.java:38)
> at
> com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.TestsRepeater.repeat(TestsRepeater.java:11)
> at
> com.intellij.rt.junit.IdeaTestRunner
+1
Le lun. 17 mars 2025, 17:33, Cesar Hernandez a
écrit :
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 9:14 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 15, 2025 at 8:30 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > Due
Fully agree
+1
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 7:21 PM Francois Papon
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think the most important part of the statement is "Both are active, both
> have a roadmap, both have users/comm
+1 and thanks JB
Le lun. 11 nov. 2024, 20:45, Samir Boudjebla a
écrit :
> +1 (non binding)
>
> Best regards,
> Sam
>
> > On Nov 11, 2024, at 11:08 AM, Christopher Shannon <
> christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > * Validated signatures and checksums
> > * Verified
+1
Thank you
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 12:32 AM Jamie G. wrote:
> +1
>
> Cheers,
> Jamie
>
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 7:52 PM Christopher Shannon
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
&
I agree, both approaches are used and I haven't seen any issues related to
it.
If we want to change it, that's fine, we can create an issue to track the
work but I don't think it is a blocker for this release.
+1
JL
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlou
Tested and works perfectly
Thanks
+1
Le mar. 23 juil. 2024, 05:01, Liao, Ken a écrit :
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> All of our internal tests passed for ActiveMQ 5.18.5. Looking forward to
> seeing it in public!
>
> Thanks,
> Ken Liao
>
> On 2024-07-22, 6:01 PM, "Matt Pavlovich" mattr...@gmail.com>
+1
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 9:21 AM Francois Papon
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks!
>
> regards,
>
> François
>
> On 08/04/2024 11:25, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >
+1
Thanks JB
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 9:10 AM fpapon wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks!
>
> regards,
>
> On 30/11/2023 14:17, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
&
Hi all,
Any information or plans for the JMS 2.0 / JMS 3.1 implementation in
ActiveMQ Classic?
I'm more interested in the Shared Durable Topic feature.
With some guidance or help, I can probably help on this.
Thanks
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
Very great job.
Looks good to me.
+1
I'll see if we can get it included in TomEE asap to see where we are in
terms of TCK.
Le jeu. 16 nov. 2023, 02:16, Eraskin, Aleksei
a écrit :
> Hi Team,
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> All of our internal tests passed for ActiveMQ 6.0.0. Looking forward to
> seein
Sounds easier to follow and avoids navigating all the time between JIRA and
Github
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 8:53 AM Francois Papon
wrote:
> +1
>
> We did that move on Shiro and it's easier because we
Same, when I have to mention both in the same discussion, I tend to add
"classic" for ActiveMQ to make sure there is no confusion with Artemis.
But that's basically it.
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 5:43 A
che/activemq/classic with apache/activemq/artemis or the way around.
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 4:46 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
> It has been discussed but not the name specifically.
>
>
+1
Thanks JB!
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 8:13 AM fpapon wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks JB!
>
> regards,
>
> On 28/06/2023 07:44, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
&g
+1
Thanks JB!
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 8:13 AM fpapon wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks JB!
>
> regards,
>
> On 28/06/2023 15:40, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> > Hi guys,
>
t least work for people who
> want to switch out the implementation.
>
> On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 5:36 AM Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>
> > The issue is that CVEs are frequent on Jackson and we can't always
> release
> > ActiveMQ
user experience.
If it's ready, let's rebase the PR and merge it so at least we can pick up
another provider.
Thanks for all the follow up
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 5:57 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
&g
ew/BrokerDestinationViewTest.java
>
> ./activemq-broker/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/broker/jmx/DestinationsViewFilter.java
>
> ./activemq-broker/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/broker/jmx/PersistenceAdapterView.java
>
> Thanks,
> Matt Pavlovich
>
> > On May 16,
Yes I remember the discussion.
To be honest, as I was mentioning, even JSON-B/P is probably overkill for
what we need.
Happy to craft up a PR so we can it discuss there and see if that is
feasible for 5.19.x
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On
ite down a utility class to
parse the small attribute we have to.
thoughts?
I'm happy to do a PR to remove it if that's the consensus.
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
+1
Thanks JB
Le mar. 11 avr. 2023, 21:01, Timothy Bish a écrit :
> On 4/11/23 05:26, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.18.1 release to your vote. This release
> > fixes activemq-client-jakarta where the META-INF/services file was
> > missing in the artifact.
Looks good to me
+1
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 8:08 PM Matt Pavlovich wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> - Internal test suite completed successfully
> - Downloaded tar.gz, confirmed scenarios using
That's ok
Thanks JB
Le dim. 5 mars 2023, 06:45, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Now 5.17.4 has been released, I propose to move forward on 5.18.0 release.
>
> The target is to submit this release to vote at the end of next week.
>
> Thanks,
> Regards
> JB
>
+1
Looks good. Thanks JB
Le ven. 10 févr. 2023, 16:57, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a
écrit :
> Hi guys,
>
> We receive several requests to provide a new (final) ActiveMQ 5.16.6
> release, including few security fixes/improvements.
>
> So, I submit ActiveMQ 5.16.6 release to your vote. This one should
Yes of course.
That sounds a good opportunity to clean remaining links to Camel
Le jeu. 4 août 2022, 10:21, Francois Papon a
écrit :
> Hi JB,
>
> Agree, make sense.
>
> regards,
>
> François
>
> On 04/08/2022 09:01, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We already removed the activemq-came
Hey Jean-Baptiste,
Sounds good to me. Thanks
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 6:22 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> New update: I just pushed the fix on activemq-web-console on
> https://github.com/apache/activem
gt;
> Justin
>
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 9:15 AM Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to know if there is an available version of ActiveMQ Classic for
> > Jakarta?
> > I think we can have
Hello Jean-Baptiste,
Just to be clear, you are changing the sources to move to jakarta namespace
right?
Is there a problem if I use a shade approach with a classifier so it does
not impact?
I'd like to try it in TomEE and see how it works
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismon
to use it.
WDYT?
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
34 matches
Mail list logo
