All the post-vote release tasks are done, except removing "draft" from
the release notes and creating the announcement. If anybody is
interested, I'd like to collaboratively go over the release notes to
make sure they are good to go before sending out the announcement
tomorrow. We can coordinate in
This vote passes with 9 +1s and no other votes.
The post-vote release tasks are tracked on
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/4803
On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 3:44 PM Christopher wrote:
>
> My vote is +1
>
> I checked:
>
> * sigs/checksums for all artifacts
> * binary tarball contains expecte
My vote is +1
I checked:
* sigs/checksums for all artifacts
* binary tarball contains expected jars in lib/
* source tarball matches commit in git
* jars have javadoc/source jars
* jars are sealed and have manifest entry that matches git commit
* full build using JDK 17 works fine with no test fa
I plan on closing this vote tomorrow after making my own vote.
On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 9:52 PM Daniel Roberts wrote:
>
> +1 binding
>
> ran "mvn clean package verify" on src contents
> verified signatures and checksums on bin and src
> verified license and notice files in bin and src.
>
> Looked
+1 binding
ran "mvn clean package verify" on src contents
verified signatures and checksums on bin and src
verified license and notice files in bin and src.
Looked into the issue that Keith mentioned and fixed the website deployment
job so the release notes are now updated.
https://accumulo.apach
+1 binding
* verified sunny day tests pass with "mvn clean verify -Psunny" (src)
* verified signatures (bin + src)
* verified hashes (bin + src)
* verified LICENSE and NOTICE files both present at top-level (bin + src)
* verified no binary files in src ("grep -rIL --exclude-dir={target,test} .")
+1 (binding)
Some of the things I did for verification/testing locally:
* Validated signatures and checksums
* Verified license and notice files in archives
* Verified source license headers with 'mvn apache-rat:check'
* Built and ran all the sunny integration tests
On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 3:55
+1 binding
* verified hashes
* ran mvn clean verify -Psunny on tar which passes cleanly
* stood up an instance via uno and did some basic table operations and
ingest with no issues
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 2:10 AM Christopher wrote:
>
> Accumulo Developers,
>
> Please consider the following candi
+ 1 Binding
* verified sigs and hashes
* built from source tar and ran tests, also tested a local instance and
some custom iterators
Almost forgot to respond this morning. Thanks Keith for the reminder!
On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 1:52 PM Keith Turner wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> * Ran mvn verify -Psu
+1 binding
* Ran mvn verify -Psunny on source tar contents
* Verified source tar contents matched 2.13-rc1 tag
* Verified hash and signatures for tar files
* Attempted to build Fluo against the staging repo and ran into this
issue[1] with the accumulo2-maven-plugin and 2.1.3 RC1. Was able to
+1 binding
verified signatures
verified hashes
confirmed binary files are only for tests
checked source LICENSE and NOTICE files exist
checked binary LICENSE and NOTICE files exist
Ran SunnyDay tests (mvn clean package -psunny)
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 2:17 PM Adam Lerman wrote:
> +1 binding vo
+1 binding vote
Built and ran all tests
Ran local tests with downstream application with no observer errors or
performance issues.
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 2:10 AM Christopher wrote:
> Accumulo Developers,
>
> Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 2.1.3.
>
> Git Commit:
>
Accumulo Developers,
Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 2.1.3.
Git Commit:
8f52dd10f7cbfef192c9cc431543619b7072139a
Branch:
2.1.3-rc1
If this vote passes, a gpg-signed tag will be created using:
git tag -f -s -m 'Apache Accumulo 2.1.3' rel/2.1.3 \
8f52dd1
13 matches
Mail list logo
