: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc1
Accumulo Developers,
Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.7.3. (This branch is
based on the same commit as the pre-release rc0 test candidate, commit
c3a0d1d5e2f810ebcda346977009ab0fd1bd34f7) Release notes, java docs
-1 Sorry Ed, you can blame me.
I think I have a simple fix that we can push out with the next RC:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/232
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Christopher wrote:
> Although there's a few workarounds, I'm also -1 due to ACCUMULO-4600.
>
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 3:34
Although there's a few workarounds, I'm also -1 due to ACCUMULO-4600.
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 3:34 PM Keith Turner wrote:
> -1 Also because of ACCUMULO-4600
>
> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 7:11 AM, Ed Coleman wrote:
> > Accumulo Developers,
> >
> > Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo
-1 Also because of ACCUMULO-4600
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 7:11 AM, Ed Coleman wrote:
> Accumulo Developers,
>
> Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.7.3. (This branch is
> based on the same commit as the pre-release rc0 test candidate, commit
> c3a0d1d5e2f810ebcda346977009ab0fd
-1 (binding) due to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4600
Everything else looks good though!
* sigs/xsums
* no unexpected source files
* could run bin tarball (trivial shell interactions, ingested 16M csv
records)
* Git tag exists
* KEYS is updated
* L&N look good on both src and
t; Sent: Monday, March 06, 2017 5:41 PM
> > To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc1
> >
> > Event: Failed: Signature Validation
> > Monday, March 06, 2017 07:08:37 EST (GMT-0500) typeId signature-staging
> failureMessage No public key:
and it is showing closed now -
has this resolved for you?
Ed Coleman
-Original Message-
From: Michael Wall [mailto:mjw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2017 5:41 PM
To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc1
Event: Failed: Signature Validation
Monday, March
From: Michael Wall [mailto:mjw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2017 5:41 PM
To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc1
Event: Failed: Signature Validation
Monday, March 06, 2017 07:08:37 EST (GMT-0500) typeId signature-staging
failureMessage No public key: Key wit
Event: Failed: Signature Validation
Monday, March 06, 2017 07:08:37 EST (GMT-0500)
typeId signature-staging
failureMessage No public key: Key with id: (fc4368e0864bcc36) was not able
to be located on http://gpg-keyserver.de/. Upload your public key and try
the operation again.
failureMessage No pub
Looks published now, to one server at least:
https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?search=edcoleman%40apache.org&op=index
Where does Nexus require it to be published?
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 3:21 PM Josh Elser wrote:
> Looks like this was attempted, but Ed just needs to publish his GPG key
> (the close
Looks like this was attempted, but Ed just needs to publish his GPG key
(the close op failed) :)
Christopher wrote:
Staging repository just needs to be closed.
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017, 11:00 Mike Miller wrote:
Hey Ed - I am getting this error when clicking the source or binary links:
Repository
Staging repository just needs to be closed.
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017, 11:00 Mike Miller wrote:
> Hey Ed - I am getting this error when clicking the source or binary links:
> Repository "orgapacheaccumulo-1064 (staging: open)"
> [id=orgapacheaccumulo-1064] exists but is not exposed.
>
> On Mon, Mar 6,
Hey Ed - I am getting this error when clicking the source or binary links:
Repository "orgapacheaccumulo-1064 (staging: open)"
[id=orgapacheaccumulo-1064] exists but is not exposed.
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 7:11 AM, Ed Coleman wrote:
> Accumulo Developers,
>
> Please consider the following candida
Accumulo Developers,
Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.7.3. (This branch is
based on the same commit as the pre-release rc0 test candidate, commit
c3a0d1d5e2f810ebcda346977009ab0fd1bd34f7) Release notes, java docs and other
non-code artifacts are still in-progress and not
14 matches
Mail list logo