The report was filed without changes – thanks for the reviews
Ed Coleman
Do you want me to include the same text in the “Issues for the board” section
in the Accumulo report too?
Ed Coleman
From: Christopher
Date: Monday, July 7, 2025 at 2:33 PM
To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Accumulo Quarterly Report - Due by Wed July 9th
Since Fluo got a board report no
Do you want me to include the “issues for the board” text in the Accumulo
report too?
Ed C
From: Christopher
Date: Monday, July 7, 2025 at 2:33 PM
To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Accumulo Quarterly Report - Due by Wed July 9th
Since Fluo got a board report notice as well, due to the p
The report was submitted without changes.
Thanks Christopher!
Ed Coleman
From: Christopher
Date: Wednesday, May 14, 2025 at 1:53 AM
To: accumulo-dev
Subject: Accumulo board report - due Wednesday 5/14
The board asked for a report this month to check on the progress of
the Fluo migration to Acc
How about something like:
The question has been raised by an ASF Director about the status of Fluo and
there is an ongoing discussion on the Accumulo private list [1]. See the Fluo
report for additional details.
From: Dave Marion
Date: Monday, April 7, 2025 at 3:49 PM
To: dev@accumulo.apache.
, I think the wording can be:
The Accumulo PMC is working with the Fluo PMC on a forthcoming
proposed resolution for the board to consider regarding the future of
the Fluo project.
The Fluo PMC's board report will have similar wording.
On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 12:03 AM dev1 wrote:
>
>
+1
LGTM.
Ed Coleman
From: Dave Marion
Date: Tuesday, February 20, 2024 at 2:42 PM
To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DRAFT][ANNOUNCE] Apache Accumulo Access 1.0.0-beta
ok, I can make those corrections and will send it out. I'll wait until 4pm
EST in case anyone else has anything they wa
Christopher wrote:
> Looks good to me.
>
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 10:43 AM Dave Marion wrote:
> >
> > Looks good Ed. Thanks!
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 10:20 AM dev1 wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > The Accumulo community decided to
The Accumulo community decided to draft the Apache community reports on the
Accumulo dev list – and this is a draft of the January report for review /
comments. The report is due by Jan 10th.
The text below is copied from the reporting tool and may not reflect the final
formatting of the fin
+1
Verified signatures.
Built from src tar:
* Sunny tests pass
* Started instance in uno and did a quick check (create tables, insert
data, scan tables) and performed an upgrade to 2.1 without seeing any issues.
Ed Coleman
From: Christopher
Date: Monday, November 13, 2023 at 9:43 AM
T
If you catch the MutationRejectedException you can get the violations.
Something like:
} catch (MutationsRejectedException mex) {
log.warn("Failed to update reference for table: " + tableName);
log.warn("Constraint violations: {}", mex.getConstraintViolationSummaries());
throw new Ille
>
> All of our repos are labeled appropriately though so people can find them
> and contribute if they want. We'll see if we get any new people from that
> this year.
>
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023, 21:18 dev1 wrote:
>
> > They do suggest a few options, but it is all subject
e case, then it probably
doesn't matter what you select. Sorry if my feedback on that point was
misplaced. I'll trust you to leave it whichever way you think is best,
even if you decide that it's better to change it back to Moderate.
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 5:29 PM dev1 wrote:
&g
her things like that, which
are not dependent on elasticity). Maybe those other things aren't as
"significant", but that's subjective, so I think adding "at least"
makes it more accurate.
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 12:24 PM dev1 wrote:
>
> Thanks – fixed in tool.
Thanks – fixed in tool.
FYI: The reason for the caution is that formatting / wrapping / whitespace with
text pasted into the email may differ than what the tool will submit.
Ed Coleman
From: Daniel Roberts
Date: Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 10:53 AM
To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Subject: Re
The Accumulo community decided to draft the Apache community reports on the
Accumulo dev list – and this is a draft of the October report for review /
comments. I’d like to submit the report by Sept 30th (it is formally by Oct
11th)
The text below is copied from the reporting tool and may not
+1
* Verified signatures
* Built from tar with no errors (including errorprone)
* Sunny tests passed
* Started an uno instances and did some spot checks
* Verified no unexpected exception in the log files
Ed Coleman
From: Christopher
Date: Monday, August 14, 2023 at 4:26
+1
* Verified signatures
* Built from tar with no errors (including errorprone)
* Sunny tests passed
* Started an uno instances and did some spot checks
* Verified no unexpected exception in the log files
Ed Coleman
From: ctubb...@apache.org
Date: Monday, August 14, 2023
+1
Verified signatures and successfully ran sunny tests. Errorprone does fail
with a minor error with assert usages that is fixed in PR 3691.
Ed Coleman
From: Christopher
Date: Monday, August 14, 2023 at 4:16 AM
To: accumulo-dev
Subject: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 2.1.2-rc1
Accumulo Developers,
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Accumulo has invited Dan
Roberts to become a committer / PMC member and we are pleased to announce that
they have accepted.
Being a committer enables easier contribution to the project since there is no
need to go via the patch submission proces
w.cve.org/CVERecord?id=%3ca%20href=>'>https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-34340<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2023-34340>
From: dev1
Date: Tuesday, July 11, 2023 at 10:18 AM
To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Accumulo Quaterly Report - Due by 7/12
Thanks
ight re-write of this sentence may be sufficient.
"The large number of issues opened (133) vs closed (77) reflects issues
being
created as work on elasticity changes are identified."
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 9:34 AM dev1 wrote:
> I updated the section that Mark pointed out. It n
)
Ed Coleman
From: dev1
Date: Friday, July 7, 2023 at 9:56 AM
To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Accumulo Quaterly Report - Due by 7/12
Thanks – I’ll make that change.
One section that I think could use more text is Community Health section. The
ASF board is also interested in more than
ng
like, i.e., "Work continues on the evolution of the Accumulo processing
model to support dynamic scaling and provide elasticity." or "Work on the
evolution of the Accumulo processing model to support dynamic scaling and
provide elasticity is ongoing."
On Thu, Jul 6, 2023
The Accumulo community decided to draft the Apache community reports on the
Accumulo dev list – and this is a draft of the July report for review /
comments.
The text below is copied from the reporting tool and may not reflect the final
formatting of the final report when submitted.
Ed Colema
+1
Verified signatures (asc, md5, sha1 and sha512) match expected
Sunny tests passed with no failures.
Ed Coleman
From: Christopher
Date: Wednesday, June 14, 2023 at 1:49 AM
To: accumulo-dev
Subject: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 2.1.1-rc2
Accumulo Developers,
Please consider the following candidate
+1
I verified the sha512 and asc signatures match. Ran sunny tests on the source
tarball, once with:
> mvn clean verify package -Psunny
And again with
> mvn -Dhadoop.profile=3 clean verify package -Psunny
Both passed and I did not replicate the build issue that Dave is having.
Ed Coleman
---
/display/ACCUMULO/Apache+Accumulo+Home
-Original Message-
From: Albert Whitlock
Sent: Friday, April 7, 2023 9:29 AM
To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Accumulo quarterly report (due Saturday 4/8)
LGTM as well. Thanks Ed.
Albert
On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 4:27 PM dev1 wrote
I did some quick checks and all looks good.
- verified sha512 signatures
- verified signing key
- sunny tests pass.
Ed Coleman
-Original Message-
From: Christopher
Sent: Wednesday, April 5, 2023 4:25 PM
To: accumulo-dev
Subject: [TEST][VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.10.3-rc0
Accumulo Develo
The Accumulo community decided to draft the Apache community reports on the
Accumulo dev list – and this is a draft of the January report for review /
comments.
The text below is copied from the reporting tool and may not reflect the final
formatting of the final report when submitted.
Ed Cole
In case anyone is interested.
Hi All,
The ASF Travel Assistance Committee is supporting taking up to six (6) people
to attend Berlin Buzzwords In June this year.
This includes Conference passes, and travel & accommodation as needed.
Please see our website at https://tac.apache.org for more inf
ontributors not
> > > > participating
> > > > > > on
> > > > > > > GitHub, were really challenged at all. However, since I seem to
> > be
> > > > the
> > > > > > only
> > > > > > > one ad
t clear that we're proceeding
> > > in
> that
> > > direction under my objection (-0), and that I'm not convinced this
> > > is
> the
> > > best path forward. Hopefully, I will be proven wrong in time.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2
esolved
> and the only comment on the ticket is one that Ed added two days ago
> requesting an ACCUMULO wiki space.
>
> On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 12:26 PM dev1 wrote:
>
>> I do not see any comments in the infa slack channel - so no updates
>> for now.
>>
>> --
I do not see any comments in the infa slack channel - so no updates for now.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Marion
Sent: Friday, March 3, 2023 12:06 PM
To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Enable Github wiki in asf.yaml?
Right, I was just curious if there was any follow-up
The 2.1 branch on Accumulo GiHub repo was inadvertently deleted (Friday 1/20)
and then was restored Sat (1/21). The activity occurred due to
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/3165. Posting this here in case anyone
was impacted and to preserve a record in the archive.
Ed Coleman
The report has been submitted without changes as posted below.
Ed Coleman
-Original Message-
From: Christopher
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2023 2:40 PM
To: accumulo-dev
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Accumulo quarterly report (due Wednesday 1/18)
Works for me
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023, 10:29 dev1
The Accumulo community decided to draft the Apache community reports on the
Accumulo dev list – and this is a draft of the January report for review /
comments.
I received a notice yesterday that the Accumulo quarterly report is overdue and
it needs to be submitted before the board meeting on W
-1 - There seems to be an issue with the testCompactions test in ShellServerIT
- not sure if its related to the other metadata issues, but looks odd - see
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/3050
-Original Message-
From: Christopher
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2022 3:03 PM
To: a
-1
discovered an issue with the upgrade code. If the stand-alone upgrade tool is
used the cluster will not start (issue #3041)
Ed Coleman
-Original Message-
From: Christopher
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2022 5:13 PM
To: accumulo-dev
Subject: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 2.1.0-rc1
Accumulo
> I guess that should be "is not pursuing"?
> > >
> > > Otherwise, it LGTM.
> > >
> > > Thank you again.
> > >
> > > - Arvind Shyamsundar (HE / HIM)
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From
The Apache Accumulo quarterly report is due Wednesday, Oct 12. The community
decided to publicly prepare the report on the dev mailing list. Below is the
current draft. (note: This is a cut-n-paste from the report wizard, so there
may be formatting differences that will not appear when the rep
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Accumulo has invited Chris to
become a committer and PMC member and we are pleased to announce that they have
accepted. Please join me in welcoming Chris Shannon to the Accumulo Community.
Chris has contributed several quality improvements and n
I think that those can be deleted - if you make sure to identify the correct
locks.
I don't think that the fate delete command will work to clean those up, and you
will end up directly deleting the node from ZooKeeper.
-Original Message-
From: Logan Jones
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2022
The Accumulo quarterly report has been published to the Apache Board agenda
without any changes.
Ed Coleman
-Original Message-
From: dev1
Sent: Friday, July 8, 2022 10:08 AM
To: 'dev@accumulo.apache.org'
Subject: {DISCUSS} Accumulo Quarterly Report - due Wed 7/13
Th
The Accumulo quarterly report is due Wednesday, July 13, 2022. . The
community decided to publicly prepare the report on the dev mailing list.
Below is the current draft. (note: This is a cut-n-paste from the report
wizard, so there may be formatting differences that will not appear when the
There seems to be a few PRs that have mostly been resolved and need to be
merged - the fate print command issues for one. I think we would be better off
closing off open PRs before creating release candidates.
Ed Coleman
-Original Message-
From: Christopher
Sent: Monday, June 6, 2022
Why are you specifically calling out pausing migrations?
And other than suspending migrations - what you have outlined is essentially
the procedure(s) that can be done today. I'm not sure how much impact there is
with pausing migrations, as long as the suspend duration is increased.
Overall, I
ndefinitely.
On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 3:11 PM Dominic Garguilo
wrote:
>
> LGTM
>
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 2:08 PM Dave Marion wrote:
>
> > LGTM.
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 12:57 PM dev1 wrote:
> >
> > > The Accumulo quarterly report is due Wed
I don't think it's worth tracking indefinitely.
On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 3:11 PM Dominic Garguilo
wrote:
>
> LGTM
>
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 2:08 PM Dave Marion wrote:
>
> > LGTM.
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 12:57 PM dev1 wrote:
> >
>
The Accumulo quarterly report is due Wednesday, April 13, 2022. . The
community decided to publicly prepare the report on the dev mailing list.
Below is the current draft.
(note: This is a cut-n-paster from the report wizard, so there may be
formatting differences that will not appear when t
+1
Verified:
Sunny day tests pass with no issues (mvn verify -Psunny -DreuseForks-false)
Commit hash matches
sha512 checksums for src and binary tar files match expected
Ed Coleman
-Original Message-
From: Christopher
Sent: Tuesday, February 8, 2022 10:08 AM
To: accumulo-dev
Subject:
The report has been filed. There were no changes. Thanks for reviews everyone.
Ed Coleman
-Original Message-
From: dev1
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2022 9:30 AM
To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Subject: Accumulo quarterly report. Due 1/12/2022
The Accumulo community quarterly report for
The Accumulo community quarterly report for January is due Wednesday 1/12/2022.
The community decided to publicly prepare the report on the dev mailing list.
Below is the current draft. This is a simple cut'n'paste from the report
wizard, so actual formatting may be different in the report.
Ed
Some of those tests are trying to stress conditions that require a lot of
resources to replicate specific conditions. Have you tried to run those
individual tests in isolation so that you are not competing for resources? Do
they always fail, or are the failures transient?
-Original Message-
; >
> > On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 9:01 AM Dave Marion wrote:
> >
> > > Typo in last line, "Jira to Gibhub"
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 8:10 AM dev1 wrote:
> > >
> > > > The Accumulo community quarterly report for October is
The Accumulo community quarterly report for October is due Wednesday
10/13/2021. The community decided to publicly prepare the report on the dev
mailing list. Below is the current draft.
Ed Coleman
--- Draft report ---
## Description:
The Apache Accumulo is a robust, scalable, distributed ke
The reporting of the rate vs the absolute count is likely because the logging
registry is currently implemented using a StepRegistry
(https://javadoc.io/doc/io.micrometer/micrometer-core/latest/io/micrometer/core/instrument/step/StepMeterRegistry.html)
"Registry that step-normalizes counts and s
The information provided by micrometer instrumentation should be consistent
with the values produced by Hadoop metrics. Things like gauges and counters
are straight forward and should match 1:1. Things that collect / calculate
statics may be slightly different due to implementation details - s
The blog post is over three years old - what versions of software are you
using. For example, it looks like influxDB is at 2.0.8 and 2.0.0 was
released Nov 2020, well after that blog post was written.
What do you have in your hadoop-metrics2-accumulo.properties file? If you
configure a file sin
The report has been filed. This is pasted directly from the report generator -
not sure what to do about the formatting.
Ed Coleman
## Description:
The Apache Accumulo is a robust, scalable, distributed key/value store with
cell-based access control and customizable server-side processing.
##
The Accumulo community has agreed to draft the quarterly reports using the
mailing list. The report is due July 14th.
--- current draft ---
## Description:
The Apache Accumulo is a robust, scalable, distributed key/value store with
cell-based access control and customizable server-side
+1
* Verified commit hashes
* Verified signatures
* Passed sunny day ITs.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher
Sent: Monday, December 21, 2020 1:39 PM
To: accumulo-dev
Subject: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 2.0.1-rc1
Accumulo Developers,
Please consider the following candidate for Apache Ac
+1
Verified signatures and commit hash
Clean build and sunny day ITs passed
-Original Message-
From: Christopher
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2020 5:27 PM
To: accumulo-dev
Subject: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.10.1-rc1
Accumulo Developers,
Please consider the following candidate for Apac
64 matches
Mail list logo
