To close the loop on this, I have merged #47 and #48 which resolve the
issues with RC3. Christopher has several changes that he would like to work
on for a 1.0.0 release. One of his suggestions was to call this release
1.0.0-beta so that we could integrate it into Accumulo (something that
Keith is
This vote is cancelled due to issues with the license. I'm going to clean
up the artifacts from this release candidate, apply PR #47 and maybe PR #48
and create a new release candidate.
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 10:35 AM Daniel Roberts wrote:
> -1 (binding) Because the release does not meet the
-1 (binding) Because the release does not meet the terms laid out by the
release policy.
The language in the release policy is clear about not including license
information for items that are not bundled in the package.
https://apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#licensing-documentation
The curre
-1 (binding)
I performed the following checks and I think I need to vote -1 because of
the language at
https://apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#licensing-documentation and
issue #46
- verified checksums
- diffed source zip to release branch, no differences
- built the source using 'mvn clean
