[Desktop-packages] [Bug 857651]

There's a patch on a different bug, so duping this one to it. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 56729 *** -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/857651 Title:

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1259562]

don't you need to clean up the icon too? Aside from that, I wonder if we'll run into bug reports after this where users lose their settings after a domain controller blip. Maybe it should avoid cleaning up remote users? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop P

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1259562]

I like this patch. Two requests, if you don't mind: 1) Can you make it in git-format-patch format so it has a commit message, etc ? 2) Can you do one preliminary clean up patch before this one that moves the existing cases where the cache files are removed into a standalone function, then chang

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 857651]

I'm on the same page as Matthias, I think. I started to look into merging this today, but I ran into a few issues that would be better enumerated using bugzilla. If you could attach the individual patches that would be great. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Des

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 857651]

See bug 40020 for other discussion about potentially creating a separate config file. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/857651 Title: Unable to hide users from login scre

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 844081]

My understanding is this bug is obsolete. canonical contributed a more general accountsservice feature for storing arbitrary metadata alongside the user. See bug 63733 for details. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 844081]

okay, but that doesn't have anything to do with this bug. Canonical already added the infrastructure to accountsservice, whether or not lightdm uses the infrastructure is a different matter -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 844081]

sounds like you know more about it than I do, but regardless, I don't think there's anything left to accountsservice. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/844081 Title: Unit